RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve repair is limited by Wallerian degeneration coupled with the slow and inconsistent rates of nerve regrowth. In more proximal injuries, delayed nerve regeneration can cause debilitating muscle atrophy. Topical application of polyethylene glycol (PEG) during neurorrhaphy facilitates the fusion of severed axonal membranes, immediately restoring action potentials across the coaptation site. In preclinical animal models, PEG-fusion resulted in remarkable early functional recovery. METHODS: This is the first randomized clinical trial comparing functional outcomes between PEG-fusion and standard neurorrhaphy. Participants with digital nerve transections were followed up at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was assessed using the Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) rating for sensory recovery at each timepoint. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and static two-point discrimination determined MRCC ratings. Postoperative quality of life was measured using the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ). RESULTS: Forty-eight transected digital nerves (25 control, 23 PEG) across twenty-two patients were analyzed. PEG-fused nerves demonstrated significantly higher MRCC scores at 2 weeks (OR 16.95, 95% CI: 1.79 - 160.38, p = 0.008) and 1 month (OR 13.40, 95% CI: 1.64 - 109.77, p = 0.009). Participants in the PEG cohort also had significantly higher average MHQ scores at 2 weeks (Hodge's g 1.28, 95% CI: 0.23 - 2.30, p = 0.0163) and 1 month (Hodge's g 1.02, 95% CI: 0.04 - 1.99, p = 0.049). No participants had adverse events related to the study drug. CONCLUSION: PEG-fusion promotes early sensory recovery and improved patient well-being following peripheral nerve repair of digital nerves.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Free fibula flap (FFF) and medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap are commonly used for upper extremity osseous reconstruction, yet donor-site morbidity has never been systematically compared. METHODS: Patients who underwent an FFF or MFC for upper extremity extra-carpal osseous reconstruction at 3 academic hand centers were retrospectively identified. Only patients who underwent reconstruction for a defect in which either flap type is routinely used or has been described in the literature were deemed eligible. Patients who agreed to participate were asked to complete the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and Lower Limb Core Scale (LLCS). The reported population norm median score of LEFS is 77 points. The LLCS population norm mean score is 90.52 points. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (10 MFC, 11 FFF) were enrolled. The median LEFS score for patients after MFC was 76 (interquartile range [IQR], 49-80) points and 75 (IQR, 56-79) points after FFF. The median LLCS score for patients after MFC was 96.4 (IQR, 87.9-100) points and 100 (IQR, 91-100) points after FFF. Median LEFS scores were slightly below the population norm, whereas median LLCS scores were above the norm for both FFF and MFC. All patients stated they would have the surgery again and that any dysfunction or pain in the leg was justified by the benefit in the arm. CONCLUSIONS: When considering whether to use an MFC or FFF for upper extremity reconstruction, both flap types appear to result in modest and comparable donor-site morbidity.
