Competitive, immunometric assay for fusion protein quantification: protein production prioritization.

Effective drug discovery demands the availability of microgram to gram quantities of high-quality protein encoded by novel transcripts. Protein expression vectors designed for large-scale protein production often include one or more specific tags to such transcripts, to simplify the purification of the targeted protein. Optimization of the complex expression and purification process requires the evaluation of multiple expression candidate clones to identify a production-suitable construct in terms of quality and final protein yield. Efficiency of the entire expression screening process is typically assessed by direct visualization of the banding patterns from whole-cell lysates on SDS-PAGE gels, by direct staining and/or immunoblotting, using antibodies against the tag or the protein of interest. These techniques, generally run under denaturing conditions, have proven to be only marginally predictive of the purification yield and authentic folding for native proteins. Small-scale, multiparallel affinity purification followed by SDS-PAGE analysis is more predictive for expression screening; however, this approach is labor intensive and time consuming. Here we describe the development of an alternative expression efficiency assessment technique, designed to evaluate the accessibility of affinity tags expressed with the desired fusion proteins, using acoustic membrane microparticle assay technology on the ViBE protein analysis workstation.

Which aspects of HTS are empirically correlated with downstream success?

High-throughput screening (HTS) is a well-established hit-finding approach used in the pharmaceutical industry. In this article, recent experience at Novartis with respect to factors influencing the success of HTS campaigns is discussed. An inherent measure of HTS quality could be defined by the assay Z and Z' factors, the number of hits and their biological potencies; however, such measures of quality do not always correlate with the advancement of hits to the later stages of drug discovery. Also, for many target classes, such as kinases, it is easy to identify hits, but, as a result of selectivity, intellectual property and other issues, the projects do not result in lead declarations. In this article, HTS success is defined as the fraction of HTS campaigns that advance into the later stages of drug discovery, and the major influencing factors are examined. Interestingly, screening compounds in individual wells or in mixtures did not have a major impact on the HTS success and, equally interesting, there was no difference in the progression rates of biochemical and cell-based assays. Particular target types, assay technologies, structure-activity relationships and powder availability had a much greater impact on success as defined above. In addition, significant mutual dependencies can be observed - while one assay format works well with one target type, this situation might be completely reversed for a combination of the same readout technology with a different target type. The results and opinions presented here should be regarded as groundwork, and a plethora of factors that influence the fate of a project, such as biophysical measurements, chemical attractiveness of the hits, strategic reasons and safety pharmacology, are not covered here. Nonetheless, it is hoped that this information will be used industry-wide to improve success rates in terms of hits progressing into exploratory chemistry and beyond. The support that can be obtained from new in silico approaches to phase transitions are also described, along with the gaps they are designed to fill.

"Plate cherry picking": a novel semi-sequential screening paradigm for cheaper, faster, information-rich compound selection.

This work describes a novel semi-sequential technique for in silico enhancement of high-throughput screening (HTS) experiments now employed at Novartis. It is used in situations in which the size of the screen is limited by the readout (e.g., high-content screens) or the amount of reagents or tools (proteins or cells) available. By performing computational chemical diversity selection on a per plate basis (instead of a per compound basis), 25% of the 1,000,000-compound screening was optimized for general initial HTS. Statistical models are then generated from target-specific primary results (percentage inhibition data) to drive the cherry picking and testing from the entire collection. Using retrospective analysis of 11 HTS campaigns, the authors show that this method would have captured on average two thirds of the active compounds (IC(50) < 10 microM) and three fourths of the active Murcko scaffolds while decreasing screening expenditure by nearly 75%. This result is true for a wide variety of targets, including G-protein-coupled receptors, chemokine receptors, kinases, metalloproteinases, pathway screens, and protein-protein interactions. Unlike time-consuming "classic" sequential approaches that require multiple iterations of cherry picking, testing, and building statistical models, here individual compounds are cherry picked just once, based directly on primary screening data. Strikingly, the authors demonstrate that models built from primary data are as robust as models built from IC(50) data. This is true for all HTS campaigns analyzed, which represent a wide variety of target classes and assay types.