Fecal calprotectin correlates with active colonic inflammatory bowel disease but not with small intestinal Crohn's disease activity.

BACKGROUND: The utility of fecal calprotectin (FC) in small intestinal Crohn's disease (CD) is unclear. We examined how reliably FC reflects clinical and mucosal disease activity in small intestinal CD, colonic CD, and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: A total of 72 Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients (23 colonic CD, 14 isolated small intestinal CD, and 35 UC) were included. Clinical activity was assessed using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) (CD) and Mayo score (UC). Inflammatory activity was assessed through ileocolonoscopy, cross-sectional imaging, C-reactive protein (CRP), and FC. Clinical activity was defined as HBI > 4 or Mayo clinical score ≥ 3. Endoscopy activity was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥ 1, SES-CD score ≥ 3, and Rutgeerts > i1. RESULTS: In UC, FC was correlated with the Mayo clinical score (P < 0.0001) and was highly correlated with the total Mayo score (P < 0.0001). A cut-off value of FC 100 µg/g provided sensitivity of 88% and specificity 100% for endoscopic activity. FC was lower for patients with endoscopic and clinical remission compared to active endoscopic disease (median 100 vs 1180 µg/g, P < 0.0001). In colonic CD, there was a significant correlation between FC and endoscopic activity (P < 0.001). For an FC cut-off value of 100 µg/g, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 67%. In contrast, for isolated small intestinal CD, there was no significant correlation between FC and objective disease activity measured by either endoscopy or imaging (AUC 0.52, P = 0.58). CONCLUSION: FC is reliable for the detection of colonic mucosal inflammation in both UC and CD but is less sensitive and reliable in the detection of small intestinal CD.

Vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease patients: attitudes, knowledge, and uptake.

BACKGROUND: Immunomodulators and biological agents, used to treat inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], are associated with an increased risk of infection, including vaccine-preventable infections. We assessed patient attitudes towards vaccination, knowledge of vaccine recommendations, and uptake of recommended vaccines. METHODS: Patients attending IBD clinics completed a self-administered, structured, paper-based questionnaire. We collected demographic data, medical and immunisation history, self-reported patient uptake, knowledge, and perceptions of childhood and adult vaccinations. RESULTS: The prevalence of treatment with biologicals, steroids, thiopurines, and methotrexate among the 300 respondents were 37.3%, 16.0%, 16.0%, and 5.7%, respectively. Self-reported vaccine completion was reported by 45.3% of patients. Vaccination uptake rates were 61.3% for influenza, 10.3% for pneumococcus, 61.0% for hepatitis B, 52.0% for hepatitis A, 26.0% for varicella, 20.7% for meningococcus, 5.3% for herpes zoster, and 11.0% for herpes papilloma virus [females only]. Significant predictors of vaccine completion were annual vaccination review by family physician (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82) or gastroenterologist [OR = 1.72], current steroid use [OR = 1.28], and current or prior treatment with biologicals [OR = 1.42]. The majority of patients reported that the primary responsibility to ensure vaccine completion lies with the patient [41.7%] and the family physician [32.3%]. Uncertainty about indications, fears of side effects, and concerns regarding vaccine safety were the most commonly reported reasons for non-uptake [22.0%, 20.7%, and 5.3%, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of recommended vaccines among IBD patients is suboptimal. Annual vaccination reviews by both family physician and gastroenterologist may improve vaccine uptake. Interventions targeted at improving vaccination uptake in IBD patients are needed.

Refined genomic localization and ethnic differences observed for the IBD5 association with Crohn's disease.

Although the general association of the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) 5 region on chromosome 5q31 to Crohn's disease (CD) has been replicated repeatedly, the identity of the precise causal variant within the region remains unknown. A recent report proposed polymorphisms in solute carrier family 22, member 4 (SLC22A4) organic cation transporter 1(OCTN1) and solute carrier family 22, member 5 (SLC22A5) (OCTN2) as responsible for the IBD5 association, but definitive, large-sample comparison of those polymorphisms with others known to be in strong linkage disequilibrium was not performed. We evaluated 1879 affected offspring and parents ascertained by a North American IBD Genetics Consortium for six IBD5 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to evaluate association localization and ethnic and subphenotypic specificity. We confirm association to the IBD5 region (best SNP IGR2096a_1/rs12521868, P<0.0005) and show this association to be exclusive to the non-Jewish (NJ) population (P=0.00005) (risk allele undertransmitted in Ashkenazi Jews). Using Phase II HapMap data, we demonstrate that there are a set of polymorphisms, spanning genes from prolyl 4-hydroxylase (P4HA2) through interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) with equivalent statistical evidence of association to the reported SLC22A4 variant and that each, by itself, could entirely explain the IBD5 association to CD. Additionally, the previously reported SLC22A5 SNP is rejected as the potential causal variant. No specificity of association was seen with respect to disease type and location, and a modest association to ulcerative colitis is also observed. We confirm the importance of IBD5 to CD susceptibility, demonstrate that the locus may play a role in NJ individuals only, and establish that IRF1, PDLIM, and P4HA2 may be equally as likely to contain the IBD5 causal variant as the OCTN genes.