Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis for trastuzumab administered using a subcutaneous "manual syringe" injection or intravenously in women with HER2-positive early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PKs) of subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) trastuzumab in early breast cancer (EBC), assess the impact of covariates on trastuzumab PK, and evaluate fixed (nonweight-based) dosing for the SC regimen administrated via handheld syringe. METHODS: Serum trastuzumab concentrations from 595 patients with HER2-positive EBC in the HannaH study (fixed 600 mg SC trastuzumab or weight-based IV trastuzumab) were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the exposure-response relationships between PK, efficacy [pathologic complete response (pCR)], and safety [grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs)]. RESULTS: Trastuzumab PK was described by a two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination and first-order SC absorption, with a bioavailability of 77 %. Estimated total clearance (CL) values were 0.18-0.22 L/day for steady-state trough/peak concentrations of 75-148 µg/mL; the estimate for central volume of distribution was 2.9 L. Body weight and alanine transaminase, while showing significant effects on PK, only explained 8% of the variability in CL. Exposure-response analyses showed no relationship between PK, pCR, and grade ≥3 AEs for either regimen. CONCLUSION: A fixed 600 mg SC dose of trastuzumab provides the desired exposure, with steady-state trough concentrations (35-123 µg/mL for the 5th-95th percentiles) above the historical target concentration of 20 µg/mL for efficacy. Fixed dosing is further supported by lack of an exposure-response relationship between PK, pCR, and grade ≥3 AEs. No dose adjustment per patient factors is required within the ranges studied.

Efficacy and safety of erlotinib versus chemotherapy in second-line treatment of patients with advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer with poor prognosis (TITAN): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Erlotinib, docetaxel, and pemetrexed are approved for the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but no head-to-head data from large clinical trials are available. We undertook the Tarceva In Treatment of Advanced NSCLC (TITAN) study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of second-line erlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with refractory NSCLC. METHODS: TITAN was an international, randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study that was done at 77 sites in 24 countries. Chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic NSCLC received up to four cycles of first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy, after which patients with disease progression during or immediately after chemotherapy were offered enrolment into TITAN. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a minimisation method to ensure balanced stratification, to receive erlotinib 150 mg/day or chemotherapy (standard docetaxel or pemetrexed regimens, at the treating investigators' discretion), until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. Patients were stratified by disease stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, smoking history, and region of residence. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. TITAN was halted prematurely because of slow recruitment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00556322. FINDINGS: Between April 10, 2006, and Feb 24, 2010, 2590 chemotherapy-naive patients were treated with first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy, of whom 424 had disease progression and were enrolled into TITAN. 203 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and 221 were assigned to receive chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 27·9 months (IQR 11·0-36·0) in the erlotinib group and 24·8 months (12·1-41·6) in the chemotherapy group. Median overall survival was 5·3 months (95% CI 4·0-6·0) with erlotinib and 5·5 months (4·4-7·1) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0·96, 95% CI 0·78-1·19; log-rank p=0·73). The adverse-event profile of each group was in line with previous studies. Rash (98/196 [50%] in the erlotinib group vs 10/213 [5%] in the chemotherapy group for all grades; nine [5%] vs none for grade 3 or 4) and diarrhoea (36 [18%] vs four [2%] for all grades; five [3%] vs none for grade 3 or 4) were the most common treatment-related adverse events with erlotinib, whereas alopecia (none vs 23 [11%] for all grades; none vs one [<1%] for grade 3/4) was the most common treatment-related adverse event with chemotherapy. INTERPRETATION: No significant differences in efficacy were noted between patients treated with erlotinib and those treated with docetaxel or pemetrexed. Since the toxicity profiles of erlotinib and chemotherapy differ, second-line treatment decisions should take into account patient preference and specific toxicity risk profiles. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Influence of two different reporting systems on counts of thromboembolic and bleeding complications after St. Jude medical valve replacement: results from the GELIA study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Different standards for the reporting of morbid events and different follow up techniques have a profound impact on reported morbidity after prosthetic valve replacement. Most studies follow the guidelines of The American Association of Thoracic Surgery (AATS) and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS); the present authors' group has now developed an adapted Karnofsky scale which allows a more precise grading of the severity of morbid events. METHODS: The AATS/STS criteria and the adapted Karnofsky criteria were applied to the database of the German Experience with Low-Intensity Anticoagulation (GELIA) study. In a study population of 2,735 patients, GELIA compared three different intensities of oral anticoagulation in a prospective and randomized design. Patients registered morbid events prospectively by means of documentation cards. RESULTS: The overall rate of complications was comparable when utilizing the two classification systems. However, use of the AATS/STS criteria resulted in the counting of fewer bleeding complications, because only major bleedings were recorded. In contrast, the incidence of embolic complications was higher compared to the Karnofsky criteria because all events were counted, irrespective of their severity, while clinically insignificant (transient, reversible within 24 h) events were disregarded when using the Karnofsky grading. CONCLUSION: The adapted Karnofsky criteria provide a precise and easily understandable framework for the assessment of complications, with equal weighting of both hemorrhagic and embolic events.

Thromboembolic and bleeding complications following St. Jude Medical valve replacement: results of the German Experience With Low-Intensity Anticoagulation Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Due to their inherent thrombogenicity, mechanical cardiac valves necessitate lifelong oral anticoagulation. Less intensive oral anticoagulation than recommended earlier might result in a lower incidence of bleeding complications without increasing the embolic hazard significantly. DESIGN: Comparison of three different intensities of oral anticoagulation in a prospective, randomized multicenter design. Three months after valve replacement, patients were randomly assigned to stratum A, international normalized ratio (INR) 3.0 to 4.5; stratum B, INR 2.5 to 4.0; or stratum C, INR 2.0 to 3.5. PATIENTS: Data from 2,735 patients following aortic valve replacement (AVR; n = 2,024), mitral valve replacement (MVR; n = 553), and combined AVR and MVR (n = 158) with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve (St. Jude Medical; St. Paul, MN) between July 1993 and May 1999 were analyzed, covering a total follow-up period of 6,801 patient-years. All complications were registered prospectively. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Fifty-one thromboembolic events (TEs) were documented, resulting in a linearized incidence of 0.75 TEs per 100 patient-years, 22 of which were minor (0.32% per patient-year), 10 were moderate (0.15% per patient-year), and 19 were severe (0.28% per patient-year). Thromboembolism following AVR was significantly lower than after MVR (0.53% per patient-year vs 1.64% per patient-year). Patients reported 1,687 bleeding complications (24.8% per patient-year). The vast majority of bleeding complications (n = 1,509; 22.2% per patient-year) were classified as minor, 140 were classified as moderate (2.06% per patient-year), and 38 were classified as severe (0.56% per patient-year). The clinically relevant incidences of moderate and severe TEs and bleeding complications were not significantly different between the three prespecified INR strata. CONCLUSIONS: The intention-to-treat analysis of the results of the German Experience With Low Intensity Anticoagulation study leads to the unexpected result that despite a sophisticated reporting system, the incidence of moderate and severe TE and bleeding complications was comparably low in all INR strata and more or less within the so-called background incidence reported for an age-related "normal" population. This study supports reexamination of the intensity of anticoagulation in patients with the SJM valve.