Serum Neurofilament Light Chain as Biomarker for Cladribine-Treated Multiple Sclerosis Patients in a Real-World Setting.

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is an intensely investigated biomarker in multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to explore the impact of cladribine (CLAD) on sNfL and the potential of sNfL as a predictor of long-term treatment response. Data were gathered from a prospective, real-world CLAD cohort. We measured sNfL at baseline (BL-sNfL) and 12 months (12Mo-sNfL) after CLAD start by SIMOA. Clinical and radiological assessments determined fulfilment of "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA-3). We evaluated BL-sNfL, 12M-sNfL and BL/12M sNfL ratio (sNfL-ratio) as predictors for treatment response. We followed 14 patients for a median of 41.5 months (range 24.0-50.0). NEDA-3 was fulfilled by 71%, 57% and 36% for a period of 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. We observed clinical relapses in four (29%), MRI activity in six (43%) and EDSS progression in five (36%) patients. CLAD significantly reduced sNfL (BL-sNfL: mean 24.7 pg/mL (SD ± 23.8); 12Mo-sNfL: mean 8.8 pg/mL (SD ± 6.2); p = 0.0008). We found no correlation between BL-sNfL, 12Mo-sNfL and ratio-sNfL and the time until loss of NEDA-3, the occurrence of relapses, MRI activity, EDSS progression, treatment switch or sustained NEDA-3. We corroborate that CLAD decreases neuroaxonal damage in MS patients as determined by sNfL. However, sNfL at baseline and at 12 months failed to predict clinical and radiological treatment response in our real-world cohort. Long-term sNfL assessments in larger studies are essential to explore the predictive utility of sNfL in patients treated with immune reconstitution therapies.

Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2 Antigen in Patients Treated with Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibodies: It Is Not All about B Cell Recovery.

Anti-CD20 therapies decrease the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 immunization. We aimed to determine the extent of the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in correlation with peripheral B-cell dynamics among patients with central nervous system inflammatory disorders treated with anti-CD20 medications. We retrospectively included patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy after antigen contact who were divided into responders (>7 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL) and non-responders (<7 BAU/mL). In participants with first antigen contact prior to therapy, we investigated the recall response elicited once under treatment. We included 80 patients (responders n = 34, non-responders n = 37, recall cohort n = 9). The B-cell counts among responders were significantly higher compared to non-responders (mean 1012 cells/µL ± SD 105 vs. mean 17 cells/µL ± SD 47; p < 0.001). Despite very low B-cell counts (mean 9 cells/µL ± SD 20), humoral response was preserved among the recall cohort (mean 1653 BAU/mL ± SD 2250.1) and did not differ significantly from responders (mean 735 BAU/mL ± SD 1529.9; p = 0.14). Our data suggest that peripheral B cells are required to generate antibodies to neo-antigens but not for a recall response during anti-CD20 therapy. Evaluation of B-cell counts and pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies might serve as biomarkers for estimating the immune competence to mount a humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 antigens.