The Clinical Significance of Infolded Limbus on Postreduction Arthrogram in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether presence of an infolded limbus on hip arthrogram at index closed reduction was associated with increased residual dysplasia or secondary surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent closed reduction for dysplasia of the hip with a minimum 2-year follow-up between 1980 and 2016. Demographic data was obtained including the age at reduction and severity of dislocation based on the International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification. Arthrograms performed at time of closed reduction were separately reviewed by 3 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons to evaluate for an infolded limbus. The primary radiographic outcome was acetabular indices at 2 and 4 years postreduction. We also assessed the presence of avascular necrosis and rate of secondary reconstructive surgery for residual dysplasia. RESULTS: A total of 182 hips in 165 patients underwent closed reduction at a mean age of 9.8±4.5 mo and were followed a mean of 9.0±4.9 y. An infolded limbus was identified in 20.3% (37/182) hips with substantial agreement among the 3 graders (Fleiss κ=0.75). The frequency of labral infolding increased with the severity of dislocation (8.8%% of IHDI II, 26.7% IHDI III, and 25.0% of IHDI IV hips; P=0.03). Hips with infolded limbus were older at reduction (12.4±5.3 vs. 9.2±5.8 mo, P=0.001). The mean acetabular index was higher in hips with infolded limbus than hips without at 2 years postreduction (34.8±4.8 vs. 32.6±5.8 degrees, respectively; P=0.04). However, multivariate analysis revealed that only the severity of dislocation predicted dysplasia at 2 years postreduction. No significant difference in acetabular index was seen at 4 years postreduction (27.2±7.4 vs. 25.4±6.5 degrees, P=0.24). There was no difference in avascular necrosis between groups (P=0.74). There was no difference in rate of secondary surgery between hips with labral infolding and those without (35% vs. 30%, respectively; P=0.52). CONCLUSIONS: An infolded limbus was more common in older patients with more severe dislocations. However, it is not associated with increased residual dysplasia or secondary surgery and may have limited utility in decision-making during closed reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prognostic study.

Outpatient Bryant's Overhead Traction Does Not Affect the Rate of Open Reduction or Avascular Necrosis in Developmental Dislocation of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of preliminary traction to increase the likelihood of closed reduction and/or decrease the incidence of avascular necrosis in the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is controversial. We sought to document compliance with and effectiveness of Bryant's outpatient traction in patients with idiopathic DDH. METHODS: Patients presenting between 6 and 24 months of age with idiopathic irreducible DDH were prospectively enrolled in the study. Prereduction outpatient traction was prescribed at participating surgeons' preference and parents' expressed willingness to comply with a traction protocol of at least 14 hours/day for 4 weeks. Traction hours were documented using a validated monitor; parents also reported average daily usage. Rate of successful closed reduction and evidence of capital epiphyseal growth disturbance 1 year' and 2 years' postreduction were documented. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with 115 affected hips were enrolled. Reliable recorded traction hours were obtained in 31 patients with 36 affected hips. Defining compliance as 14 hours/day average use, 14 of 31 patients (45.2%) were compliant, 2 (6.5%) admitted noncompliance, while 15 (48.2%) claimed to be compliant, but were not. Overall, 68/115 hips (59.0%) were closed reduced. Age at treatment was the only demographic characteristic associated with an increased incidence of closed reduction (11.7 vs. 14.6 mo, P<0.01). Successful closed reduction was achieved in 10/16 hips (62.5%) of compliant patients, 12/20 (60.0%) of noncompliant patients, and 43/72 (59.7%) of no-traction patients. Irregular ossific nucleus development was noted 1-year postindex reduction in 5/16 (31.3%) of complaint-patient hips and 25/92 (27.2%) of noncomplaint and no-traction hips. Distorted proximal femoral epiphysis was noted at 2 years postreduction in 2/15 hips (13.3%) of compliant patients and 15/52 hips (28.8%) in noncompliant and no-traction patients. None of these differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Parent-reported use of outpatient traction is unreliable. Four weeks of outpatient overhead Bryant's traction did not affect the rate of closed reduction or avascular necrosis in late-presenting DDH in this cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prospective cohort.