Determinants of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: the German Device Registry perspective.

BACKGROUND: In the present study, we have focused upon rates and clinical determinants of inappropriate shock (IS) after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: Data were collected prospectively in the German Device II Registry. RESULTS: A total of 783 patients were included. Three sub-groups were identified: non-shock (NS) included 725 patients (92.6%), IS 24 (3.1%), and appropriate shock (AS) 34 (4.3%). IS patients were younger (AS 68 (58-77); IS 59 (51-68); NS 66 (56-75) years; p = 0.03), had been mainly referred for primary prophylaxis (AS 42.4%; IS 70.8%; NS 67.3%; p = 0.01), had a higher resting heart rate (AS 70 (63-80); IS 80 (71-98); NS 70 (60-81) BPM; p = 0.003), had more often atrial fibrillation (AF) (AS 14.7%; IS 45.8%; NS 18.8%; p = 0.006), and shorter QRS duration (AS 100 (90-120); IS 95 (90-100); NS 120 (98-150) msec.; p = 0.001). VVI-ICD was more common in IS (AS 64.7%; IS 83.3%; NS 49.8%; p = 0.002). At a follow-up of 18.2 months (75% IQR 13.6-22.4), no deaths were observed in the IS group, one (2.9%) in the AS, and 36 (4.9%) in the NS (p = 0.9). At logistic regression, VVI-ICD implantation was the strongest IS independent determinant (OR 5.0; 95% CI 1.6-15.9; p = 0.004) together with age < 70 years (OR 4.6; CI 1.4-14.7; p = 0.009), AF at time of ICD implantation (OR 3.5; CI 1.3-9.1; p = 0.01), and resting heart rate > 70/min (OR 2.8; CI 1.0-7.3; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In a contemporary setting, some specific conditions such as VVI-ICD, younger age, and faster resting heart rates remain important IS determinants after ICD implantation.

Usefulness of Clopidogrel Loading in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the BRAVO-3 Randomized Trial).

P2Y12-inhibitor initiation with clopidogrel using a loading dose (LD) versus no LD (NLD) provides more rapid inhibition of platelet activation and reduced risk of ischemic events after coronary stenting. Whether a similar beneficial effect is achieved in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown. We evaluate the effects of preprocedural clopidogrel LD versus no NLD on 48-hour and 30-day clinical outcomes after TAVI. In the BRAVO-3 trial, 802 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral TAVI were randomized to intraprocedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin. Administration of clopidogrel LD was left to the discretion of the treating physician. For this analysis, patients were stratified according to receiving clopidogrel LD (n = 294, 36.6%) or NLD (n = 508, 63.4%) before TAVI. LD patients more often received a self-expandable prosthesis using larger sheaths. P2Y12-inhibitor maintenance therapy pre-TAVI was similar in patients with LD versus NLD (28.2% vs 33.1%, p = 0.16). LD versus NLD was associated with similar incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events (i e., death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) (4.1% vs 4.1%, p = 0.97) and major bleeding (8.5% vs 7.7%, p = 0.68), but a higher rate of major vascular complications (11.9% vs 7.1%, p = 0.02). Multivariable adjustment showed that clopidogrel LD did not affect any of the studied clinical events, including major vascular complications (odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.39, p = 0.67). Also patients on clopidogrel maintenance therapy and thus considered in steady state were not at reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with patients not on clopidogrel (3.7% vs 5.2%, p = 0.36). In conclusion, in patients who underwent TAVI, use of clopidogrel LD was associated with higher vascular complications and otherwise similar clinical events compared to NLD patients.

Activation of remote monitoring for cardiac implantable electronic devices: small dog for tall weeds.

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has been popularized as a precious patients' management tool. We have investigated RM within the premises of a multicenter, prospective, real-world registry, i.e., the German Device II. METHODS: We have focused on: (1) CIEDs with RM capabilities implantation rate and (2) actual rate of RM features activation. RESULTS: A cohort of 1223 CIEDs patients were treated from 04/11 to 02/14. Of these, 720 (58.8%) were implanted with RM-capable devices and were presenting significantly more often a clinical diagnosis of dilatative cardiomyopathy and an indication for cardiac resynchronization. At discharge, the RM feature was activated in only 12.6% (91/720) of the total number of patients implanted with RM-capable CIEDs. After adjusting for implanting center, there was no significant correlation between any of the patient clinical characteristics and RM activation. One-year estimated mortality was 9.0% in patients with activated RM, 5.6% in those with not activated RM, and 7.7% in those without RM capability (p = 0.3). The RM feature was still activated in 13.8% of the patients surviving at follow-up. Patients undergoing RM had a trend for higher re-hospitalization rate and less visits in the device outpatient clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Although RM in CIEDs may be a clinically valuable technological armamentarium, its activation does not reflect patients' clinical profile. In fact, RM is often not activated, most probably because it is still recognized as a source of increased workload in a reality where reimbursement plans for dedicated human resources are not yet optimized.

Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Anticoagulation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized BRAVO-3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation is required during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. Although an optimal regimen has not been determined, heparin is mainly used. Direct thrombin inhibition with bivalirudin may be an effective alternative to heparin as the procedural anticoagulant agent in this setting. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine whether bivalirudin offers an alternative to heparin as the procedural anticoagulant agent in patients undergoing TAVR. METHODS: A total of 802 patients with aortic stenosis were randomized to undergo transfemoral TAVR with bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during the procedure. The 2 primary endpoints were major bleeding within 48 h or before hospital discharge (whichever occurred first) and 30-day net adverse clinical events, defined as the combination of major adverse cardiovascular events (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and major bleeding. RESULTS: Anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin did not meet superiority because it did not result in significantly lower rates of major bleeding at 48 h (6.9% vs. 9.0%; relative risk: 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48 to 1.23; p = 0.27) or net adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days (14.4% vs. 16.1%; relative risk: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.24; risk difference: -1.72; 95% CI: -6.70 to 3.25; p = 0.50); regarding the latter, the prespecified noninferiority hypothesis was met (pnoninferiority < 0.01). Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events at 48 h were not significantly different (3.5% vs. 4.8%; relative risk: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.43; p = 0.35). At 48 h, the bivalirudin group had significantly fewer myocardial infarctions but more acute kidney injury events than the heparin group; at 30 days, these differences were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial of TAVR procedural pharmacotherapy, bivalirudin did not reduce rates of major bleeding at 48 h or net adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days compared with heparin. Although superiority was not shown, the noninferiority hypothesis was met with respect to the latter factor. Given the lower cost, heparin should remain the standard of care, and bivalirudin can be an alternative anticoagulant option in patients unable to receive heparin in TAVR. (International, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients Undergoing TAVR to Determine the Treatment Effect [Both Safety and Efficacy] of Using Bivalirudin Instead of UFH [BRAVO-2/3]; NCT01651780).