Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 30(5): 497-503, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25747558

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present the development, structure and results of a database on planned and ongoing health technology assessment (HTA) projects (POP Database) in Europe. METHODS: The POP Database (POP DB) was set up in an iterative process from a basic Excel sheet to a multifunctional electronic online database. The functionalities, such as the search terminology, the procedures to fill and update the database, the access rules to enter the database, as well as the maintenance roles, were defined in a multistep participatory feedback loop with EUnetHTA Partners. RESULTS: The POP Database has become an online database that hosts not only the titles and MeSH categorizations, but also some basic information on status and contact details about the listed projects of EUnetHTA Partners. Currently, it stores more than 1,200 planned, ongoing or recently published projects of forty-three EUnetHTA Partners from twenty-four countries. Because the POP Database aims to facilitate collaboration, it also provides a matching system to assist in identifying similar projects. Overall, more than 10 percent of the projects in the database are identical both in terms of pathology (indication or disease) and technology (drug, medical device, intervention). In addition, approximately 30 percent of the projects are similar, meaning that they have at least some overlap in content. CONCLUSIONS: Although the POP DB is successful concerning regular updates of most national HTA agencies within EUnetHTA, little is known about its actual effects on collaborations in Europe. Moreover, many non-nationally nominated HTA producing agencies neither have access to the POP DB nor can share their projects.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/normas , Cooperação Internacional , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/organização & administração , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Internet , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 28(2): 171-9, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22559761

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A new decision-making process was set up by the Austrian Ministry of Health to regulate coverage of new proposed Extra Medical Services (EMS; German: Medizinische Einzel-Leistung [MEL]) in 2008. As part of the annual decision-making process an independent academic institution (LBI-HTA) is evaluating relevant evidence on these new technologies and provides HTAs, including evidence-based recommendations for decision makers. METHODS: About ten EMS assessments are performed annually by the LBI-HTA simultaneously between January and March. Each peer-reviewed report consists of a systematic literature review and critical appraisal of evidence using the GRADE methodology. The generation of numerous reports of good quality standards within the short timeframe is achieved by a standardized workflow with predefined assignment of tasks for all participants. RESULTS: In total, the LBI-HTA performed twenty-five EMS assessments on thirty-three different interventions in the last three years. Coverage was recommended with limitation for eleven (33%) interventions, and not recommended for twenty-two (66%) interventions. The federal health commission decided on acceptance or preliminary acceptance of coverage in seven (22%) cases, rejection in eighteen (55%) cases and changed the status to "subject to approval" in seven (24%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-coverage assessment of new hospital interventions was implemented successfully in Austria. It has proved to be a useful tool to support decision makers with objective evidence when deciding whether or not to reimburse medical services.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/métodos , Áustria , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...