RESUMO
Background and purpose: In real-time lung tumor-tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), tracking accuracy is related to radiotherapy efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the respiratory movement relationship between a lung tumor and a fiducial marker position in each direction using four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) images. Materials and methods: A series of 31 patients with a fiducial marker for lung SBRT was retrospectively analyzed using 4DCT. In the upper (UG) and middle and lower lobe groups (MLG), the cross-correlation coefficients of respiratory movement between the lung tumor and fiducial marker position in four directions (anterior-posterior, left-right, superior-inferior [SI], and three-dimensional [3D]) were calculated for each gating window (≤1, ≤2, and ≤ 3 mm). Subsequently, the proportions of phase numbers in unplanned irradiation (with lung tumors outside the gating window and fiducial markers inside the gating window) were calculated for each gating window. Results: In the SI and 3D directions, the cross-correlation coefficients were significantly different between UG (mean r = 0.59, 0.63, respectively) and MLG (mean r = 0.95, 0.97, respectively). In both the groups, the proportions of phase numbers in unplanned irradiation were 11 %, 28 %, and 63 % for the ≤ 1-, ≤2-, and ≤ 3-mm gating windows, respectively. Conclusions: Compared with MLG, fiducial markers for UG have low cross-correlation coefficients between the lung tumor and the fiducial marker position. Using 4DCT to assess the risk of unplanned irradiation in a gating window setting and selecting a high cross-correlation coefficient fiducial marker in advance are important for accurate treatment using lung SBRT.
RESUMO
Background: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), which allows generating steep dose gradients, is a beneficial treatment for companion animals with adjacent target and risk organs. IMRT is essential for high setup accuracy for avoiding overdose to risk organs, and optimal radiotherapy is important for evaluating the setup accuracy of companion animals. Aim: To use an immobilization device to evaluate setup errors in radiotherapy for companion animals. Methods: We calculated setup errors in radiotherapy for 386 animals (dogs and cats; 3,261 registration images) that underwent radiotherapy between 2016 and 2022. The companion animals were immobilized with a customized bite block and vacuum lock device. A quantile-quantile plot with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the histogram of the setup errors, and the systematic and random setup errors were calculated for each region (brain, head and neck, chest and abdomen, pelvis, and spine). Results: The setup error in each direction presented an extremely narrow-interval histogram, with the following lower and upper 95% CIs: cranial-caudal (-0.08, -0.06 cm); left-right (-0.04, -0.02 cm); and dorsal-ventral (-0.13, -0.11 cm). The mean systematic setup error was 0.16 cm (range: 0.12-0.36 cm), and the random error was 0.15 cm (range: 0.08-0.34 cm). The pelvis showed the highest systematic and random setup errors (mean: 0.36 and 0.23 cm, respectively). Conclusion: The use of an immobilization device enables highly accurate radiotherapy for companion animals (95% CI < 0.15 cm).
