A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on the efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation is expected to be safe and effective in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as well as in other endoscopic procedures. The present study aimed to clarify the usefulness and safety of CO2 insufflation in gastric ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 102 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to CO2 insufflation (CO2 group, n = 54) or air insufflation (Air group, n = 48). Abdominal pain and distension were chronologically recorded on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The volume of residual gas in the digestive tract was measured by computed tomography performed immediately after ESD. RESULTS: Abdominal pain on a 100-mm VAS in the CO2 vs. Air group was 4 vs. 3 immediately after ESD, 4 vs. 4 one hour after the procedure, 3 vs. 3 three hours after the procedure, and 1 vs. 4 the next morning, showing no difference between the groups. In addition, there was no difference in abdominal distension on the 100-mm VAS over the time course of the study. The volume of residual gas in the digestive tract in the CO2 group was significantly smaller than that in the Air group (643 mL vs. 1037 mL, P < 0.001). The dose of sedative drugs did not differ between the groups. Neither the incidences of complications nor clinical courses differed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with air insufflation, CO2 insufflation during gastric ESD significantly reduced the volume of residual gas in the digestive tract but not the VAS score of abdominal pain and distension.

A pilot study to assess mediastinal emphysema after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection with carbon dioxide insufflation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mediastinal emphysema sometimes develops following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) without perforation because the esophagus has no serosa. Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation during esophageal ESD may reduce the incidence of mediastinal emphysema. The aim of the present study was to compare the incidence and severity of post-ESD mediastinal emphysema in patients receiving CO2 insufflation vs. standard air insufflation during esophageal ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 27 patients who had undergone esophageal ESD with insufflation of CO2 between July 2009 and March 2010 were enrolled in this study (CO2 group). Another 105 patients who had undergone esophageal ESD with air insufflation between March 2004 and May 2009 were included as historical controls (air group). Multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) was carried out immediately after ESD. A conventional chest radiograph was taken the next day. Mediastinal emphysema findings on MDCT and radiography were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Mediastinal emphysema detected by chest radiography was 0 % in the CO2 group vs. 6.6 % in the air group (n.s.). Mediastinal emphysema on MDCT was significantly less frequent in the CO2 group compared with the air group (30 % vs. 63 %; P = 0.002). The severity of mediastinal emphysema also tended to be lower in the CO2 group. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas mediastinal emphysema detected by radiography is not so common, MDCT immediately after ESD revealed a certain prevalence of post-ESD mediastinal emphysema. Insufflation of CO2 rather than air during esophageal ESD significantly reduced postprocedural mediastinal emphysema. CO2 can be considered as insufflating gas for esophageal ESD.

[Clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary tract diseases].

This study was carried out to clarify the efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the diagnosis of biliary tract diseases, Three hundred and eleven patients who underwent MRCP and ERCP during the period from January 1999 to December 1999 at our institution were included in the study. Two gastroenterologists who were blinded to results of direct cholangiography and final diagnoses interpreted MRCP images prospectively. The biliary duct was visualized by MRCP and ERCP in 99.4% and 89.5% of the cases, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were 95%, 97%, and 97%, respectively. MRCP depicted the presence of strictures with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 97%, 96%, and 96%, respectively. There were three false-positive cases because of artifacts from arterial compression, The accuracy of MRCP and ERCP in differentiation of benign strictures from malignant ones was 85% and 96%, respectively. Based on these results, it is concluded that MRCP has high capability in visualization of the biliary tree, and in detection of stones and strictures, To avoid over and under-diagnosis, awareness of some pitfalls inherent in, MRCP is important. We suggest that MRCP should be recommended for patients with suspicion of biliary tract diseases in the initial stage of making diagnosis.

[IFOBT-positive gastric cancer].

Among 888 patients who underwent operation or endoscopic resection for gastric cancer (1994-1998), 75 patients, who had no colorectal disease or only small polyps 5 mm or less in diameter, were positive on the immunologic fecal occult blood test (IFOBT) (the positive group). They are compared with the other 813 patients (the negative group) as to the following 6 points: symptoms, presence of anemia, depth of invasion including macroscopic appearance, location, maximum diameter of lesions, and microscopic findings. The rate of positive-IFOBT gastric cancer was 8.4%. The average blood hemoglobin concentration was significantly lower in the positive group than in the negative group. Advanced cancers, especially type 2 and 3, were significantly more frequent in the positive group than in the negative group. The size of the lesions tended to be larger in the positive group than in the negative group. There was no difference between the groups as to symptoms, location, depth of invasion and microscopic findings. In conclusion, IFOBT-positive patients who have no colorectal disease or only small polyps 5 mm or less in diameter should be recommended to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[The significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in acute cholecystitis].

To clarify the significance of magnetic renonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the acute phase of acute cholecystitis, MRCP was carried out in forty-five patients with acute cholecystitis in their acute phase. The MR pericholecystic high signal was observed in 38 of the 45 patients (84%). Enlargement of the gallbladder, presence of gallstones, and impacted stones was seen in 71%, 53%, and 18%, respectively. The MR pericholecystic high signal was classified into four categories: type 0, not observed; type 1, a liner high signal; type 2, a band-like high signal; type 3, a radiating high signal. In patients who showed a type 3 MR pericholecystic high signal, 91% required percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, and most of the gallbladders were diagnosed as necrotic cholecystitis by histology. The accuracy of MRCP for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis was 96%. It was suggested that MRCP for patients with acute cholecystitis in the acute phase provides useful information for planning the treatment.