Comparison of alternate-day versus consecutive-day treatment with S-1: assessment of tumor growth inhibition and toxicity reduction in gastric cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo.

BACKGROUND: The toxic effects of S-1 can lead to discontinuation of treatment. Strategies for reducing toxicity without compromising therapeutic effectiveness are required. METHODS: We used the human gastric cancer cell lines MKN28 and MKN45 to examine such strategies in vitro. The cell lines were treated with three different regimens, given on alternate days (alternate-day) or on consecutive days (consecutive-day). On consecutive days, treatment A provided the same total dose as the alternate-day treatment, and treatment B was given for the same number of days as the alternate-day treatment. A fourth group served as control. In vitro, the relative inhibition (RI) of tumor growth by 5-fluorouracil was calculated using the 2-(2-methyl-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophyl)-5-2, 4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (WST-8) method. We also carried out an in vivo experiment in which tumor-bearing nude mice (BALBc/nu-nu) were used to examine the antitumor activity of S-1. Leukocyte counts and gastrointestinal mucosal injury were compared in mice that received alternate-day and consecutive-day treatments. RESULTS: In vitro, for MKN28, the RI was 22.9% for alternate-day, 34.1% for consecutive-day A, and 37.7% for consecutive-day B treatments. For MKN45, the RI was 51.1% for alternate-day, 52.2% for consecutive-day A, and 50.5% for consecutive-day B treatments. In vivo, for MKN28, the treated groups showed higher inhibition than the control, and inhibition of tumor growth was higher with alternate-day than with consecutive-day treatment. The RI was significantly higher with alternate-day (49.3%) than with consecutive-day treatment (16.2%; P < 0.05). For MKN45, the RI was greater than 50% in both treated groups. With consecutive-day treatment, 5 of the 14 mice used died during treatment. Leukocyte counts were lower in the mice with consecutive-day than with alternate-day treatment, or control. Atrophic changes and inflammatory cell infiltration of the small intestinal mucosa were severe after consecutive-day, but minimal after alternate-day treatment. CONCLUSION: Experimentally, alternate-day treatment with S-1 is equivalent to consecutive-day treatment in terms of RI of tumor growth, with lower toxicity.

Gasless laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy is feasible and useful for non-obese patients with early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of gasless laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy except when treating obese patients compared with open distal gastrectomy for early cancer. METHODOLOGY: We treated 92 patients with distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer consecutively. Patients with massive submucosal invasion and/or LN swelling were allocated for the open method, and patients with slightly invasive submucosal cancer were allocated for gasless laparoscopy-assisted surgery. As exceptions we employed open surgery for overweight patients and gasless laparoscopy for elderly and/or feeble patients. RESULTS: We attempted to perform open and laparoscopy-assisted surgery on 52 and 40 patients, respectively. Three cases in the laparoscopy-assisted group were converted to open surgery because of obesity. The age was older and BMI was lower in the laparoscopy-assisted group. In terms of operative time and blood loss as well as postoperative recovery, the results for the laparoscopy-assisted group were superior to those of the open surgery group. There were no cases of cardiopulmonary complications for the laparoscopy-assisted group. CONCLUSIONS: Gasless laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy is feasible and useful for early gastric cancer except when treating obese patients.

Doxifluridine combined with weekly paclitaxel for second-line treatment in patients with gastric cancer resistant to TS-1.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with gastric cancer respond to TS-1, but some fail to respond or have recurrence. Second-line therapy is needed. METHODS: We performed a pilot study in patients with advanced gastric cancer who did not respond to TS-1 or who had disease recurrence. The patients received oral doxifluridine (600 mg/day) on days 1 to 21 and an intravenous infusion of paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2)) on days 7, 14, and 21 of a 28-day cycle. The treatment was repeated until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Response rate, duration of response, median survival time (MST), effects on pleural effusion, ascites, and other signs, and toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: The study group comprised 52 patients. The response rate was 28%. The duration of response was 103 days. The MST after the start of second-line treatment was 175 days (95% confidence interval, 135 to 224 days). Pleural effusion or ascites resolved or decreased in 73% of the patients. Hair loss occurred in 32 patients (62%), and leukopenia developed in 28 (54%, grade 3 in 1 patient and grade 2 or lower in the others). The MST after the start of treatment with TS-1 was about 16 months. CONCLUSION: A combination of doxifluridine and weekly paclitaxel is expected to be an effective second-line treatment for gastric cancer not responding to TS-1, especially in patients with malignant ascites or pleural effusion. However, it remains unclear whether paclitaxel plus doxifluridine results in a better response and survival benefit than paclitaxel alone in this subgroup of patients. Further studies are therefore necessary.

Aggressive G-CSF-producing gastric cancer complicated by lung and brain abscesses, mimicking metastases.

A 57-year-old Japanese man had type II c gastric cancer with marked lymph node metastases associated with leukocytosis and elevated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Total gastrectomy and distal pancreatectomy with lymph node dissection were performed. Although the primary lesion was negative for G-CSF by histopathological immunostaining, a highly increased G-CSF m-RNA level, measured using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in frozen sections, led to a diagnosis of G-CSF-producing gastric cancer. The leukocytes and G-CSF decreased immediately after surgery. He then had an intraabdominal recurrence, and was diagnosed with multiple tumors in his lung and brain, with abnormally elevated leukocytes and greatly increased G-CSF; he died 4 months after the surgery. Autopsy showed intraabdominal recurrence of cancer, with no metastases to the lung or brain, but with multiple brain and lung abscesses. We speculate that the excessively increased neutrophils induced by G-CSF infiltrated the lung and brain and formed abscesses, mimicking metastases.

Alternate-day oral therapy with TS-1 for advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: TS-1 (1M tegafur-0.4M 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine-1M potassium oxonate) has a high single-agent response rate, of more than 40%, for gastric cancer; however, the recommended regimen of 4 weeks of administration interrupted by 2 weeks of drug withdrawal frequently causes adverse effects. The alternate-day dosage of pyrimidine fluoride anticancer drugs could reduce their adverse effects without compromising their effects. We attempted an alternate-day therapy with TS-1 aiming at the avoidance of adverse effects and significantly longer duration of administration. METHODS: We observed patients for clinical effects and adverse effects under alternate-day dosage of TS-1, and determined blood 5-fluorouracil (FU) levels. The judgment of clinical effects was based on the New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors (RECIST), whereas the evaluation of adverse effects was based on the National Cancer Institute NCI-common toxicity criteria (CTC). RESULTS: In 72 (78%) of 92 patients, the TS-1 regimen was converted to the alternate-day dosage because of adverse effects. Twenty patients were treated with the alternate-day dosage regimen from the start because of the fear of adverse effects. The alternate-day dosage was clinically effective, as 28 of 34 patients after relatively curative resection remained alive and free from recurrence. The median survival time of 58 patients after noncurative resection or with unresectable or recurrent cancer was 332 days. Fifty-three percent of these 58 patients achieved partial response and stable disease of more than 12 weeks' duration. We followed time-dependent changes in blood 5-FU levels in 36 of the patients on alternate-day therapy, in whom TS-1 had been administered daily before being administered every other day. The trough level was significantly lower when TS-1 was administered on alternate days, and blood 5-FU reached a peak at sufficiently effective levels at 2 h even after administration on the alternate-day basis. CONCLUSION: . This study demonstrated that, compared with daily administration, alternate-day administration of TS-1 reduces adverse effects, and simultaneously ensures effective blood levels and provides sufficient clinical effects.TS-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine-1 M potassium oxonate) has a high single-agent response rate, of more than 40%, for gastric cancer; however, the recommended regimen of 4 weeks of administration interrupted by 2 weeks of drug withdrawal frequently causes adverse effects. The alternate-day dosage of pyrimidine fluoride anticancer drugs could reduce their adverse effects without compromising their effects. We attempted an alternate-day therapy with TS-1 aiming at the avoidance of adverse effects and significantly longer duration of administration.

[A case of type 4 gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination successfully treated over 2 years by alternate-day administration of TS-1].

We report a patient with unresectable advanced gastric cancer who has been being treated by TS-1 administration on alternate days for 2 years. The patient was a 50-year-old female with type 4 gastric cancer accompanied by Schnitzler metastasis and pleural effusion. TS-1 administration was initiated at a daily dose of 100 mg with a schedule of 4-week administration and 2-week suspension. However, grade 2 hepatic dysfunction and leukocytopenia developed. When the daily TS-1 administration was changed to alternate-day administration at the same dose, no side effects were observed, allowing the continuation of treatment. She has maintained a minor response (MR)-no change (NC) for 1 year and 5 months, and is still symptom-free and being treated on an outpatient basis at present, 2 years after treatment. TS-1 is an anti-cancer drug that plays a central role in chemotherapy for gastric cancer. However, in some patients, side effects sometimes develop using the routine administration method, making continuation of administration difficult. Alternate-day TS-1 administration has great potential as a protocol that produces long-term anti-tumor effects while reducing side effects.