RESUMO
Genetically modified (GM) papaya has not yet been approved for importation into, or cultivation in the European Union (EU) and Japan. A DNA extraction method using the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (PM method) and a method using a buffer containing cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB method) have been adopted as the official Japanese methods for detecting GM foods. However, the amounts of DNA extracted from papaya by these methods are very low. Therefore, we investigated an extraction method to obtain a high yield of DNA from raw or freeze-dried fresh papaya using the Promega Wizard DNA Clean-Up Resin System (WCR). The incubation for the extraction was carried out at 58 degrees C without proteinase K for 15 min. The extract was applied to a mini-column, then the column was washed with 80% isopropyl alcohol, and genomic DNA adsorbed on the column was eluted with TE buffer. The WCR method gave a higher yield of genomic DNA, and was simpler and faster than the PM method or CTAB method. In addition, it could be used to extract genomic DNA from fresh papaya at various stages of ripeness. Based on these results, we propose that the present method using WCR is the most practical and useful way to extract genomic DNA for the purpose of detecting GM papaya.
Assuntos
Carica , DNA de Plantas/isolamento & purificação , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados , Genoma de Planta/genética , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas , Carica/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Sílica Gel , Dióxido de SilícioRESUMO
Three samples of polyvinyl chloride products for food use were examined for di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) migration levels under the conditions described in the Japanese Food Sanitation Law. These samples were two kinds of tubes and one stretched film, containing 12 to 41% DEHP by weight. DEHP migration levels from them were very low, all below 0.1 ppm, into 3 kinds of food simulant; water, 4% acetic acid and 20% ethanol. However, high levels of DEHP migrated into n-heptane, 12 ppm from the stretched film sample and more than 800 ppm from the tube samples. Migration from the 2 tubes was higher than 150 ppm, the limit of residues after evaporation in containers and wraps. Though the limit of residues after evaporation is not set for equipment used in the preparation of foods, the tested tubes were considered to be unsuitable for uses in which they come into direct contact with oils, fats or oily foods.
