Adverse event profile for immunotherapy agents compared with chemotherapy in solid organ tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy agents are an innovative oncological treatment modality and as a result their use has expanded widely. Understanding the treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of these drugs compared with traditional chemotherapy is crucial for clinical practice. DESIGN: A systematic review of studies indexed in Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Databases from January 2000 to 14 February 2019 was conducted. Randomized clinical trials comparing immunotherapy [cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)] with standard-of-care chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced solid-organ neoplasms were included if AEs were reported as an outcome. Primary outcome was AEs ≥ grade 3 in severity. Secondary outcomes were proportion of overall AEs, treatment discontinuation due to AEs, deaths due to AEs, and specific AEs [fatigue, diarrhea, acute kidney injury (AKI), colitis, pneumonitis, and hypothyroidism]. Paule-Mandel pooling and a random effects model were used to produce odds ratios (ORs) for measures of effects. RESULTS: Among 10 598 abstracts screened, we included 22 studies involving 12 727 patients. In the immunotherapy group, 16.5% of patients developed an AE ≥ grade 3 in severity, compared with 41.09% in the chemotherapy arm [OR = 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.35, I2 = 92%]. Patients receiving immunotherapy also had lower odds of developing an AE overall (OR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.28-0.44; I2 = 77%), terminating therapy due to an AE (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.78, I2 = 80%), or dying from a treatment-related AE (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98, I2 = 0%). When treated with chemotherapy versus immunotherapy, patients more frequently experienced fatigue (25.10% versus 15.83%), diarrhea (14.97% versus 11.13%), and AKI (1.79% versus 1.31%). However, colitis (1.02% versus 0.26%), pneumonitis (3.36% versus 0.36%), and hypothyroidism (6.82% versus 0.37%) were more common in those treated with immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of advanced solid-organ malignancies with immunotherapy compared with traditional chemotherapy is associated with a lower risk of AEs.

Doctor, what are my options? A prospective cohort study of an individualized care plan for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND: For cancer patients, information about their disease and its treatment is often delivered within a short time period, potentially leading to patient misunderstanding, which can impede optimal patient care. In this 3-part clinical study, we investigated the utility of an individualized care plan for patients with gastrointestinal (gi) cancer starting a new treatment. METHODS: In part 1, a comprehensive literature search identified items for potential inclusion in the care plan. Those items were formatted into a questionnaire. The questionnaire was then administered to patients as a structured interview. In part 2, health care professionals involved in the care of patients with gi cancer evaluated the resulting care plan for content and relevancy. In part 3, a 20-week prospective cohort study (10 weeks using standard of care, 10 weeks using individualized care plans) was conducted. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 2-4 weeks after administration of the care plan. RESULTS: In part 1, a 73-item questionnaire was developed and completed by 20 patients in semi-structured interviews. In part 2, long and short versions of the care plan were created. Most health care professionals preferred the long version. Based on their comments, a final version of the care plan was created. The part 3 study enrolled 104 patients. Overall satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the intervention group at baseline (p = 0.010) and follow-up (p = 0.005). Compared with control patients, the intervention cohort also reported significantly higher overall quality of life (p = 0.044) and fewer symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.048) at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of an individualized care plan resulted in improvements in outcome measures at both baseline and follow-up. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Radiation recall dermatitis: case report and review of the literature.

"Radiation recall"-also called "radiation recall dermatitis"-has been defined as the "recalling" by skin of previous radiation exposure in response to the administration of certain response-inducing drugs. Although the phenomenon is relatively well known in the medical world, an exact cause has not been documented. Here, we report a rare occurrence of the radiation recall phenomenon in a breast cancer patient after palliative radiotherapy for bone, brain, and orbital metastases.