RESUMO
Background and Aim: Endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) can facilitate an objective evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis. Although it is primarily applied in evaluating chronic pancreatitis, its efficacy in assessing early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) remains underinvestigated. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-SWE for assessing ECP diagnosed using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019. Methods: In total, 657 patients underwent EUS-SWE. Propensity score matching was used, and the participants were classified into the ECP and normal groups. ECP was diagnosed using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019. Pancreatic stiffness was assessed based on velocity (Vs) on EUS-SWE, and the optimal Vs cutoff value for ECP diagnosis was determined. A practical shear wave Vs value of ≥50% was considered significant. Results: Each group included 22 patients. The ECP group had higher pancreatic stiffness than the normal group (2.31 ± 0.67 m/s vs. 1.59 ± 0.40 m/s, p < 0.001). The Vs cutoff value for the diagnostic accuracy of ECP, as determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve, was 2.24m/s, with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.94). A high Vs was strongly correlated with the number of EUS findings (rs = 0.626, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that a history of acute pancreatitis and ≥2 EUS findings were independent predictors of a high Vs. Conclusions: There is a strong correlation between EUS-SWE findings and the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019 for ECP. Hence, EUS-SWE can be an objective and invaluable diagnostic tool for ECP diagnosis.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been widely used for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis (CP), the assessment of fibrosis using the Rosemont criteria (RC) is generally subjective. Shear wave elastography using EUS (EUS-SWE) has been advocated as an objective approach to evaluating pancreatic fibrosis; however, it is unknown which pancreatic region should be selected for measurement. This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing CP by measurement site. METHODS: Fifty patients with CP or suspected CP who underwent EUS-SWE were retrospectively analyzed. As per the RC, they were classified into two groups: CP and non-CP. Pancreatic stiffness was evaluated by measuring the velocities of the shear wave (Vs) in addition to determining the relevant cutoff value of Vs for diagnosing CP. The correlation between Vs and RC, and the RC factors affecting pancreatic stiffness were evaluated. RESULTS: In the CP group, the Vs were notably higher in all regions (P < 0.001). The Vs for diagnostic accuracy of CP were highest in the body [area under the curve (AUC): 0.87]. A significant correlation was seen between the number of RC and Vs in all regions, with the correlation coefficient being highest in the pancreatic body (rs = 0.55). Multivariate analysis revealed that lobularity with honeycombing was an independent factor for pancreatic stiffness (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The pancreatic body is a suitable region for assessing pancreatic stiffness using EUS-SWE. Additionally, quantifying Vs is a valuable objective indicator for diagnosing CP.
