Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Med Microbiol ; 67(11): 1544-1550, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30247119

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The most common illness caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A streptococcus; GAS) is acute pharyngitis. It has been reported that a small percentage of patients experience recurrent GAS pharyngitis after 10 days of treatment with oral amoxicillin. The aim of this study was to clarify whether recurrent GAS pharyngitis is reactivation caused by the primary strain remaining at the infection site, or if the reinfection is caused by newly acquired strains. METHODOLOGY: A total of 135 GAS clinical strains were isolated from the tonsils of 116 pediatric patients with acute GAS pharyngitis between November, 2012 and April, 2014 in Saga, Japan. These strains were analysed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)-typing methods. RESULTS: The isolates were grouped into 16 PFGE-types. The epidemic PFGE types that caused pharyngitis were found to change dynamically during 18 months. Eleven strains caused recurrent pharyngitis within 40 days after the last treatment, all of them showing the same PFGE-type as the primary strains. Eight of the strains caused recurrence more than 40 days after the treatment. Among them, six showed different PFGE-types from the primary strains. CONCLUSION: When recurrent pharyngitis emerges more than 40 days after the last treatment, penicillin can be prescribed again because reinfection is suspected. However, when recurrent pharyngitis takes place within 40 days after completing the treatment, alternative drugs should be considered for retreatment because the pharyngitis is likely to be due to reactivation.


Assuntos
Amoxicilina/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes/efeitos dos fármacos , Streptococcus pyogenes/genética , Administração Oral , Amoxicilina/farmacologia , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antígenos de Bactérias/genética , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/genética , Proteínas de Transporte/genética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Tipagem Molecular , Faringite/epidemiologia , Faringite/microbiologia , Recidiva , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Streptococcus pyogenes/classificação , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação
3.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 21(2): 188-95, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24334689

RESUMO

The immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated cell culture Japanese encephalitis vaccine (CC-JEV) were compared with those of an inactivated mouse brain-derived Japanese encephalitis vaccine (MB-JEV) in phase III clinical multicenter trials conducted in children. The vaccines contain the same Japanese encephalitis virus strain, the Beijing-1 strain. Two independent clinical trials (trials 1 and 2) were conducted. Trial 1 was conducted in 468 healthy children. Each subject was injected with 17 µg per dose of either CC-JEV or MB-JEV, and the immunogenicity and safety of the vaccines were investigated. Trial 1 showed that CC-JEV was more immunogenic and reactive than MB-JEV at the same dose. Therefore, to adjust the immunogenicity of CC-JEV to that of MB-JEV, a vaccine that has had a good track record regarding its efficacy for a long time, trial 2 was conducted in 484 healthy children. To improve the stability, CC-JEV was converted from a liquid type to a freeze-dried type of vaccine. Each subject was injected subcutaneously with either 4 µg per dose of CC-JEV, 8 µg per dose of CC-JEV, or 17 µg per dose of MB-JEV twice, at an interval of 2 to 4 weeks, followed by an additional booster immunization 1 to 15 months after the primary immunization. Based on the results of trial 2, 4 µg per dose of the freeze-dried CC-JEV (under the label Encevac) was selected as a substitute for the MB-JEV. Encevac was approved and launched in 2011 and has since been in use as a 2nd-generation Japanese encephalitis vaccine in Japan. (These studies have been registered at the JapicCTI under registration no. JapicCTI-132063 and JapicCTI-080586 for trials 1 and 2, respectively).


Assuntos
Encefalite Japonesa/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Encefalite Japonesa/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Encefalite Japonesa/imunologia , Animais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Encefalite Japonesa/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Encefalite Japonesa/isolamento & purificação , Camundongos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/isolamento & purificação , Células Vero
4.
J Infect Dis ; 208(2): 275-83, 2013 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23568174

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Phase II and III clinical studies were conducted to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of a novel DTaP-IPV vaccine consisting of Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV) and diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP). METHODS: A Phase II study was conducted in 104 healthy infants using Formulation H of the DTaP-sIPV vaccine containing high-dose sIPV (3, 100, and 100 D-antigen units for types 1, 2, and 3, respectively), and Formulations M and L, containing half and one-fourth of the sIPV in Formulation H, respectively. Each formulation was administered 3 times for primary immunization and once for booster immunization. A Phase III study was conducted in 342 healthy infants who received either Formulation M + oral polio vaccine (OPV) placebo or DTaP + OPV. The OPV or OPV placebo was orally administered twice between primary and booster immunizations. RESULTS: Formulation M was selected as the optimum dose. In the Phase III study, the seropositive rate was 100% for all Sabin strains after primary immunization, and the neutralizing antibody titer after booster immunization was higher than in the control group (DTaP + OPV). All adverse reactions were clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: DTaP-sIPV was shown to be a safe and immunogenic vaccine. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-121902 for Phase II study, JapicCTI-101075 for Phase III study (http://www.clinicaltrials.jp/user/cte_main.jsp).


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antipólio Oral/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Formação de Anticorpos/imunologia , Difteria/imunologia , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/imunologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Imunização Secundária/métodos , Lactente , Masculino , Poliomielite/imunologia , Poliomielite/prevenção & controle , Poliovirus/imunologia , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/imunologia , Vacina Antipólio Oral/imunologia , Tétano/imunologia , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Combinadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Combinadas/imunologia , Coqueluche/imunologia , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...