Hybrid Closed Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Maintains the Leg Length After Surgery Compared With Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the changes in leg length following open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and hybrid closed wedge high tibial osteotomy (h-CWHTO) and whether the change in leg length was associated with preoperative radiographic factors and the change in planned opening or closing width. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients who underwent OWHTO (n=57) and h-CWHTO (n=31) between 2016 and 2019. Standing full-length anteroposterior radiographs were obtained preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Changes in the lower leg and tibial length were measured using radiography, and the planned opening or closing width was decided via operative planning. Flexion contracture was examined preoperatively and one year postoperatively using a goniometer, and the correlation factors and changes in leg length were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: In the OWHTO group, the lower leg was significantly longer by a mean of 6.0±8.7 mm compared to that preoperatively (p<0.01); however, no significant difference was observed in the h-CWHTO group (mean, -0.56±11.6 mm) (p=0.788). In the OWHTO group, flexion contracture did not improve after surgery, however, in the h-CWHTO group, flexion contracture significantly improved from -7.1±7.0 degrees to -4.7±6.2 degrees postoperatively (p<0.01). No radiographic factors or bone opening or closing width were associated with changes in leg length in both groups. CONCLUSION: OWHTO led to a significant elongation of the lower leg while leg length was maintained post-h-CWHTO. However, the changes in leg length following both OWHTO and h-CWHTO were not predictable from preoperative radiographic factors or changes in bone width.

Evaluation of the Postoperative Risk of Deep Tissue Injury to the Lower Extremities Following Surgery in the Lithotomy Position.

Background The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of deep tissue injury (DTI) and potential risk factors after surgery in the lithotomy position. Methods All patients who underwent surgery in the lithotomy position under general anesthesia at a single center between January 2017 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The medical records of these patients were reviewed, and patient demographic and clinical characteristics, surgical data, and occurrence of DTI were recorded. Results During the study period, 5146 patients, 2055 (39.9%) males and 3091 (60.1%) females, with a mean age of 57.3 ± 17.4 years, underwent surgery in the lithotomy position. Seven (0.14%) patients developed DTI on their calf following surgery. All presented with severe pain and swelling, requiring prolonged hospital stay. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio (OR): 11.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-113.34, p = 0.037), higher BMI (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.17-1.50, p = 0.0001), and longer operation time (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.004-1.014, p = 0.0002) were independent risk factors for postoperative DTI. Optimal cut-off values for BMI and operation time were 23.5 kg/m2 (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 64%) and 285 minutes (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 90%), respectively. Conclusion Factors significantly associated with DTI include male sex, higher BMI, and prolonged operation time.

Comparison of the indications for high tibial osteotomy and double-level osteotomy for the correction of diverse lower-leg deformities in an Asian population with medial compartment osteoarthritis: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Double-level osteotomy (DLO) for knee osteoarthritis is becoming increasingly popular to achieve superior anatomical correction. This study aimed to compare the indication for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and DLO and to investigate preoperative bone morphology. METHODS: Data of 166 knees treated with osteotomy were evaluated. The weight-bearing line ratio, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured. Bone deformity assessment and osteotomy simulation were conducted. Normal values of mLDFA and mMPTA were defined as 85-90°. Bone deformity was classified into four patterns: femoral, tibial, both, and no deformity. Simulation was performed to achieve a postoperative weight-bearing line ratio of 62%. Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) or OWHTO was performed to achieve an mLDFA of 85° or mMPTA of up to 95°. If the postoperative parameter remained outside the correctable limit, DLO was performed. Cases were classified according to the corrective surgery performed, and those that could not be corrected after DLO were classified into the uncorrectable group. RESULTS: Femoral, tibial, both, and no deformities were observed in 14.2%, 37.8%, 10.7%, and 33.9% of cases, respectively. No cases were classified into the DFO group; however, 53.6%, 38.1%, and 8.3% were classified into the OWHTO, DLO, and uncorrectable groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Bone deformity differed among cases, and only one-third had tibial deformity. OWHTO and DLO were indicated in approximately 50% and 40% of cases, respectively. Our study results reinforce the importance of evaluating leg morphology before surgical planning to achieve acceptable alignment.