Gastric intestinal metaplasia: Prevalence in a large Australian center and nationwide survey of endoscopic practice.

Background and Aim: Atrophic gastritis (AG) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) are early changes in the stepwise progression to gastric adenocarcinoma. There is heterogeneity in international guidelines regarding the endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance of AG and GIM. This study aims to determine the prevalence of GIM in an Australian center and assess the approach of Australian endoscopists for these two conditions. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of adult patients between January 2015 and December 2020 diagnosed with GIM on gastric biopsy following upper gastric endoscopy. A web-based, 25-question, investigator-designed, multiple-choice survey was distributed among all registered endoscopists in Australia. Results: The overall prevalence of GIM within a single Australian center was 11.7% over 5 years. Of the 1026 patients identified, only 58.7% underwent mapping biopsies using the modified Sydney protocol. Among the cohort, 1.6% had low-grade dysplasia, 0.9% had high-grade dysplasia, and 1.8% had malignancy on initial gastroscopy. Two hundred and sixty-seven (7.2%) endoscopists completed the survey, 44.2% indicated they would perform mapping for all patients, and 36% only for high-risk patients. Only 1.5% (n = 4) of respondents were able to correctly identify all six endoscopic photos of GIM/AG. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that in a large tertiary center, GIM is a prevalent endoscopic finding, but the associated rates of dysplasia and cancer were low. Additionally, among a small proportion of surveyed Australian endoscopists, there is notable variability in the endoscopic approach for AG and GIM and significant knowledge gaps. More training is required to increase the recognition of GIM and compliance with histological mapping.

Identifying the real-world challenges of dysplasia surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary health network.

BACKGROUND: Dysplasia surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often suboptimal and deviates from guidelines. AIMS: To assess dysplasia surveillance behaviours and adherence to guidelines amongst a large tertiary teaching health network with a specialised IBD unit to identify areas where dysplasia surveillance could be improved. METHODS: A retrospective audit of IBD surveillance colonoscopy practice over an 18-month period was performed using the Provation Endoscopy Database and the hospital's primary sclerosing cholangitis database. RESULTS: The audit identified 115 dysplasia surveillance colonoscopies. A total of 37% of index dysplasia colonoscopies were outside recommended guidelines. A total of 10% had inadequate bowel preparation and only 40% had excellent bowel preparation. A total of 28% of patients underwent dye-based chromoendoscopy and 69% underwent high-definition white-light endoscopy. Dye chromoendoscopy was more likely to be used by IBD specialists than interventional endoscopists (P = 0.008) and other endoscopists (P = 0.004). Only IBD specialists and interventional endoscopists used dye chromoendoscopy. Dysplasia or colorectal cancer was detected in 3.4% of the colonoscopies. Overall, the several dysplasia examinations were lower than expected. CONCLUSIONS: Dysplasia surveillance in the IBD population remains an area of improvement given the current national guidelines. IBD specialists are more likely to perform dye chromoendoscopy than other endoscopists/gastroenterologists. Dysplasia rates in this real-world contemporary setting are less than expected in historical studies and may represent improvements in IBD management principles and medications.

Liver decompensation after rapid weight loss from semaglutide in a patient with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis -associated cirrhosis.

There is rapidly increasing uptake of GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) agonists such as semaglutide worldwide for weight loss and management of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). remains a paucity of safety data in the vulnerable NASH cirrhotic population. We report herein the first documented case of liver decompensation and need for liver transplant waitlisting in a patient with NASH-cirrhosis treated with semaglutide. Rapid weight loss led to the development of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy and an increase in the patients Model for Endstage Liver Disease-Na (MELD-Na) score from 11 to 22. Aggressive nutritional supplementation was commenced and the semaglutide was stopped. Over the following months she regained her weight and her liver recompensated and her MELD-Na decreased to 13, allowing her to be delisted from the transplant waitlist. This case serves as a cautionary tale to clinicians using semaglutide in the cirrhotic population and highlights the need for more safety data in this patient group.

SIRT Compared with DEB-TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Real-world Study (the SITAR Study).

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is responsible for 1% of deaths worldwide, and the incidence continues to increase. Despite surveillance programs, 70% of HCC patients are not suitable for curative options at diagnosis, and therefore, non-curative treatments are essential to modern clinical practice. There are many novel treatments, though their roles are not well defined. This study aimed to contrast Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) and Drug Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolisation (DEB-TACE) to further define their roles. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study. Factors included for analysis were type of HCC treatment, number of lesions, lesion size, multiple disease severity scores, cirrhosis and vascular invasion. The primary endpoint was transplant-free survival. RESULTS: Transplant-free survival was similar between the two cohorts (p = 0.654), despite a variation in median lesion size, SIRT: 54.5 mm, DEB-TACE: 34 mm (p ≤ 0.001). A univariate Cox proportional hazard model utilising treatment modality as the covariate showed no significant difference in survival (DEB-TACE HR 1.4 (95%CI 0.85-2.15 p = 0.207). The size of the largest lesion was the best predictor of 3-year survival (p = 0.035). Lesion size was inversely associated with survival (HR 1.01 (95%CI 1-1.02, p = 0.025)) on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to catalogue the experience of using SIRT in HCC in a real-world Australian population. It has demonstrated no difference in survival outcomes between DEB-TACE and SIRT. Further, it has shown SIRT to be a reasonable alternative to DEB-TACE especially in larger lesions and has demonstrated that DEB-TACE has a role in select patients with advanced disease.

Goblet Cell Carcinoid (GCC) of the Appendix presenting as a Small Bowel Obstruction.

A 68 year old male presented to our Emergency Department with a one-day history of right sided abdominal pain, distention and vomiting on a background of no previous abdominal surgery. Abdominal CT demonstrated a high grade, closed loop small bowel obstruction involving the terminal segment of the ileum. Also of significance was alow-density appendiceal nodule. A subsequent laparoscopy revealed the tip of the appendix adherent to the mesosigmoid colon, forming a tight band and consequent mechanical bowel obstruction. Furthermore, the meso-appendix was embedded with crystal deposits and extruding mucin. The decision was made to convert to laparotomy and perform a caecectomy. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated reactivity to synaptophysin, chromogranin A and CD56, confirming the diagnosis of Goblet Cell Carcinoid. A staging CT after this initial surgery revealed no metastasis. After discussion at our oncology MDT, the patient went on to receive a completion right hemicolectomy which revealed no further malignancy on histology. The patient otherwise progressed well, and made a good post-operative recovery.