Time to get comfortable with a labour epidural.

Women frequently request regional analgesia during labour, yet little is known about how long it takes before they become comfortable. This prospective observational study aimed to determine various time-points following maternal request for regional analgesia in labour until comfort was achieved. It was conducted in two tertiary referral centres for maternity care in Australia between December 2009 and May 2010.Midwives and anaesthetists recorded times of maternal request for regional analgesia, anaesthetist contact,anaesthetist's arrival in the labour room, local anaesthetic infiltration on starting the procedure, injection of neuraxial local anaesthetic and first report of maternal comfort. Composite median times and interquartile range were recorded for maternal request to anaesthetist arrival, anaesthetist arrival to maternal comfort and total time from request to comfort. Statistical modelling and regression analyses assessed possible factors associated with these time intervals. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Of the 324 maternal requests, 244 out of 324 (75.3%, 95% confidence interval 70.2% to 79.9%) were recorded as having achieved satisfactory labour analgesia. Median interquartile range times observed were: maternal request to anaesthetist arrival: 20 (10 to 35) minutes; anaesthetist arrival to maternal comfort: 40 (30 to 50) minutes; and total time from request to comfort: 65 (50 to 85) minutes. We have shown that approximately one hour is required for a mother to achieve comfort following her request for epidural analgesia during labour. Our findings are likely to provide useful information for antenatal education, enhance informed consent and improve the provision of anaesthetic services for labour analgesia.

Peak plasma anti-Xa levels after first and third doses of enoxaparin in women receiving weight-based thromboprophylaxis following caesarean section: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Women undergoing caesarean section are at higher risk for thromboembolic complications following delivery than other parturients. The aim of this study was to determine whether higher doses of enoxaparin based on body weight are safe and more likely to achieve plasma anti-Xa levels within the accepted thromboprophylactic range. METHODS: We undertook a prospective cohort study of 80 women undergoing caesarean section in a tertiary obstetric hospital with >6000 deliveries per year. Enoxaparin was administered after caesarean section using the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists weight-adjusted dosing guidelines. Plasma anti-Xa levels were measured at baseline and 3-4 h after enoxaparin administration on days one and three postoperatively. The main outcomes of interest were plasma anti-Xa levels and the proportion of patients with plasma anti-Xa levels in the range of 0.2-0.4 IU/mL. RESULTS: The proportion of women with anti-Xa levels between 0.2 and 0.4 IU/mL was 72% (95% CI 60-81%). Unadjusted mean anti-Xa levels were 0.26 ± 0.09 IU/mL and 0.28 ± 0.08 IU/mL on day one and day three respectively. No woman had levels >0.48 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: The majority of women receiving weight-based enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis following caesarean section achieved plasma anti-Xa levels within the putative thromboprophylactic range. No woman achieved levels associated with an increased risk of bleeding (>0.8 IU/mL). These findings provide a safety basis for a large prospective study using this regimen.