Influence of drying and HEMA treatment on dentin wettability.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of drying time and primer pre-application (35% HEMA in water) on water spreading/infiltration on dentin. METHODS: Freshly extracted molars were embedded in resin and sectioned on their coronal side. Flat occlusal dentin surfaces were prepared using wet SiC paper from nos. 80-4000. A computerized contact angle device complementing a special software (Wingoutt) was used to measure the contact angle (theta) kinetics of a reference liquid (pure H(2)O) in the ten groups each of ten dentin surfaces during 120 s: Gp1: etched (37% phosphoric acid for 15 s) and blot-dried; Gp2: 3 s dried; Gp3: 5 s air-dried; Gp4: 10 s air-dried; Gp5: 20 s air-dried; Gp6: 30 s air-dried; Gp7: 1 min dried with hair dryer; Gp8: 5 s air-dried and HEMA treated; Gp9: 30 s air-dried followed by HEMA treatment; Gp10: HEMA treated prior to 30 s air-drying. three drops were applied on each sample. 40 contact angles were recorded for each drop with a frequency of one measure every 3 s. A one-way ANOVA test was used for data analysis. A PLSD test was conducted to identify statistical differences between pairs of groups at a reliability level of 95%. RESULTS: At each measurement time, air-drying, whatever its duration, significantly decreased the wetting ability of the pure water on the etched dentin in comparison with the blot-dried group. The contact angle increases with drying time. No significant differences in water contact angle were obtained between 3, 5 and 10 s in spite of a slight decrease in the spreading/infiltration ability of water the longer the drying time. HEMA increases the spreading/infiltration ability of water on 5 or 30 s air-dried etched dentin surfaces; 30 s air-drying did not alter the spreading/infiltration ability of the water on etched and HEMA treated dentin. SIGNIFICANCE: Dentin hydrophobicity increases depending on air-drying time. HEMA-based primer allows to prevent collagen collapse, which may be created by air-drying and partly rewet the collapsed collagen network.

An 18-month clinical study of bond failures with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in orthodontic practice.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, over an 18-month period, the clinical performances of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for bonding orthodontic brackets and to analyze various factors that influenced their survival and failure rates. Two orthodontists using the edgewise technique participated in this study; 6113 brackets, including 20 molar tubes, were bonded with Fuji Ortho LC (GC, Europe, N.V. Leuven, Belgium) in 135 patients. Ceramic, metal, and resin brackets were tested, and both operators used the same bonding method for the brackets. The survival rate and the failure rate of the brackets were evaluated. The rates were determined by operator, bracket type, tooth position in the dental arch, and age and sex of the patients. Bracket survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier test. The Cox-Mantel statistical test with a level of significance set at 0.05 was used to compare survival curves. The chi-square test was used at a level of P < .05 to compare failure rates. The overall failure rate for the sample was 7%, and the overall survival rate was equal to 0.918. Age had no significant influence on the failure rate (P = .07); however, it had a significant influence on the survival rate (P < .01). The best survival rates were obtained in the groups aged 16 to 20 years (S[t] = 0.943) and older than 20 years (S[t] = 0.929). The difference between males and females was not statistically significant in terms of failure rate (P = .17). However, the Cox-Mantel test showed a higher bracket survival rate for the males (S[t] = 0.924) than for the females (S[t] = 0.839) (P < .00001). The influence of the operator was not statistically significant on the failure rate (P = .08); however, it was significant on the survival rate (P < .0002). Location in the arch had a significant influence on the failure and survival rates. The worst results were obtained in the upper incisors and the canines, and the best results in the lower premolars. Fifteen percent of the molar tubes failed; their survival rate was equal to 0.833. The failure rate was significantly greater for resin brackets than for metal or ceramic brackets (P = .007). The highest survival rate was obtained with ceramic brackets (P = .0001). This in vivo study showed that bonding brackets and molar tubes with Fuji Ortho LC is compatible with clinical orthodontic practice.

Influence of the time-point of salivary contamination on dentin shear bond strength of 3 dentin adhesive systems.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the duration of salivary contamination at different stages during the bonding procedures on shear bond strengths (SBS) of 3 dentin adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flat human dentin surfaces were produced by wet grinding on SiC paper 800. The adhesives used were Syntac Sprint (SS) (Vivadent), One Step (OS) (Bisco), Clearfil Liner Bond 2 (LB2) (Kuraray). Three durations of contamination (3 s, 10 s, and 20 s) at 3 stages (before adhesive application, after its application, and after its polymerization). In all cases the saliva was not rinsed off. Twenty-seven groups of 10 samples were studied according to 3 adhesives, 3 stages, and 3 durations of contamination. For each adhesive, 1 control group, 3 groups with contamination before adhesive application, 3 groups with salivary contamination on the uncured adhesive, and 3 groups with contamination after polymerization (except for SS) were studied. Composite cylinders (Z100, 3M; 3 mm Ø, 5 mm high) were polymerized on the surfaces and stored in 37 degrees C H2O for 48 hours prior to shear bond testing (v = 5 mm/min). RESULTS: Anova and Scheffe tests showed that for the one-bottle systems tested, salivary contamination prior to adhesive application had no adverse effect on bonding efficacy, SBS decreased significantly when saliva contamination occurred after adhesive application. The self-etching primer tested was more tolerant to salivary contamination, except when the salivary contamination occurred before the polymerization of the adhesive. CONCLUSIONS: Salivary contamination does not have the same influence at different stages of the bonding process with modern adhesives. Pending better knowledge of the mechanisms involved in the influence of salivary contamination on bonded assemblies, it seems necessary to continue to recommend using the rubber dam in adhesive dentistry.