Differences in phenotypes, symptoms, and survival in patients with cardiomyopathy-a prospective observational study from the Sahlgrenska CardioMyoPathy Centre.

Introduction: Cardiomyopathy is the fourth most common cause of heart failure. The spectrum of cardiomyopathies may be impacted by changes in environmental factors and the prognosis may be influenced by modern treatment. The aim of this study is to create a prospective clinical cohort, the Sahlgrenska CardioMyoPathy Centre (SCMPC) study, and compare patients with cardiomyopathies in terms of phenotype, symptoms, and survival. Methods: The SCMPC study was founded in 2018 by including patients with all types of suspected cardiomyopathies. This study included data on patient characteristics, background, family history, symptoms, diagnostic examinations, and treatment including heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Patients were categorized by the type of cardiomyopathy on the basis of the diagnostic criteria laid down by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. The primary outcomes were death, heart transplantation, or MCS, analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional regression, adjusted for age, gender, LVEF and QRS width on ECG in milliseconds. Results: In all, 461 patients and 73.1% men with a mean age of 53.6 ± 16 years were included in the study. The most common diagnosis was dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), followed by cardiac sarcoidosis and myocarditis. Dyspnea was the most common initial symptom in patients with DCM and amyloidosis, while patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) presented with ventricular arrythmias. Patients with ARVC, left-ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and DCM had the longest time from the debut of symptoms until inclusion in the study. Overall, 86% of the patients survived without heart transplantation or MCS after 2.5 years. The primary outcome differed among the cardiomyopathies, where the worst prognosis was reported for ARVC, LVNC, and cardiac amyloidosis. In a Cox regression analysis, it was found that ARVC and LVNC were independently associated with an increased risk of death, heart transplantation, or MCS compared with DCM. Further, female gender, a lower LVEF, and a wider QRS width were associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome. Conclusions: The SCMPC database offers a unique opportunity to explore the spectrum of cardiomyopathies over time. There is a large difference in characteristics and symptoms at debut and a remarkable difference in outcome, where the worst prognosis was reported for ARVC, LVNC, and cardiac amyloidosis.

Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is advantageous compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) regarding hospital stay, blood loss and recovery. Only one randomized study is available, which showed enhanced functional recovery after LDP compared with ODP. METHODS: Consecutive patients evaluated at a multidisciplinary tumour board and planned for standard distal pancreatectomy were randomized prospectively to LDP or ODP in an unblinded, parallel-group, single-centre superiority trial. The primary outcome was postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 105 screened patients, 60 were randomized and 58 (24 women, 41 per cent) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis; there were 29 patients of mean age 68 years in the LDP group and 29 of mean age 63 years in the ODP group. The main indication was cystic pancreatic lesions, followed by neuroendocrine tumours. The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 (i.q.r. 4-5) days in the laparoscopic group versus 6 (5-7) days in the open group (P = 0·002). Functional recovery was attained after a median of 4 (i.q.r. 2-6) versus 6 (4-7) days respectively (P = 0·007), and duration of surgery was 120 min in both groups (P = 0·482). Blood loss was less with laparoscopic surgery: median 50 (i.q.r. 25-150) ml versus 100 (100-300) ml in the open group (P = 0·018). No difference was found in the complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade III or above: 4 versus 8 patients respectively). The rate of delayed gastric emptying and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: LDP is associated with shorter hospital stay than ODP, with shorter time to functional recovery and less bleeding. Registration number: ISRCTN26912858 ( www.isrctn.com).

ANTECEDENTES: Los estudios han sugerido que la pancreatectomía distal laparoscópica (laparoscopic dital pancreatectomy, LDP) resulta ventajosa en comparación con la pancreatectomía distal por vía abierta (open distal pancreatectomy, ODP) respecto a la estancia hospitalaria, pérdida sanguínea y recuperación. Solamente existe un estudio aleatorizado que muestra una mejor recuperación funcional después de la LDP en comparación con la ODP. MÉTODOS: En un ensayo de superioridad unicéntrico, abierto y de grupos paralelos, los pacientes consecutivos evaluados por el comité multidisciplinario de tumores y a los que se indicó una pancreatectomía distal estándar fueron asignados al azar de forma prospectiva a LDP o ODP. El resultado primario fue la estancia hospitalaria postoperatoria. RESULTADOS: De 105 pacientes evaluados, 60 fueron aleatorizados, de los cuales 58 pacientes (24 mujeres; 41%) fueron incluidos y asignados a LDP (n = 29; edad media 68 años) o ODP (n = 29; edad media 63 años) e incluidos en un análisis por intención de tratamiento. La principal indicación fueron las lesiones quísticas del páncreas seguida de los tumores neuroendocrinos. La estancia hospitalaria postoperatoria fue de 5 días (rango intercuartílico, interquartile range, IQR 4-5) en el grupo laparoscópico versus 6 (5-7) días en el grupo de cirugía abierta (P = 0,002). La recuperación funcional se alcanzó después de 4 (2-6) versus 6 (4-7) días (P = 0,007), y el tiempo operatorio fue de 120 minutos en ambos grupos (P = 0.48). Las pérdidas hemáticas fueron menores en la cirugía laparoscópica, 50 (25-150) versus 100 mL (100-300) (P = 0,018). No se hallaron diferencias en las tasas de complicaciones (grado Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) con 4 versus 8 pacientes en el grupo laparoscópico y en el grupo abierto, respectivamente. La tasa de retraso en el vaciamiento gástrico y de fístula postoperatoria clínicamente relevante no difirió entre los grupos. CONCLUSIÓN: La pancreatectomía distal laparoscópica se asocia con una estancia hospitalaria más corta en comparación con la cirugía abierta, con un menor tiempo para la recuperación funcional y menos hemorragia.

Prospective study of pain, quality of life and the economic impact of open inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: There are variations in quality of life (QoL) and reported risk of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. The aim of this study was to investigate the improvement in pain and QoL after open inguinal hernia repair, and the economic impact. METHODS: Patients undergoing open mesh repair of a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were stratified depending on preoperative levels of symptoms and pain. Short Form 36 (SF-36®) and EQ-5D™ questionnaires were filled in before, and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. EQ-5D™ data, together with information on the mean value of a quality-adjusted life-year and the societal cost of hernia repair, were used to calculate the monetary value of QoL gained and the mean return on investment. RESULTS: Of 225 patients who began the study, 184 completed follow-up at 12 months. Some 77·2 per cent reported improvement in pain and 5·4 per cent reported increased pain after surgery. Significant improvement in SF-36® scores, pain scores measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and symptoms were found in the majority of patients, even those with mild symptoms before surgery. For the whole group, the bodily pain score increased from 56·4 before surgery to 82·6 at 12 months after hernia repair (P < 0·050), and the VAS score decreased from a median of 4 to 0 (P < 0·050). The return on investment was positive for all groups of patients, including those with mild symptoms. CONCLUSION: QoL improves after open inguinal hernia repair, with a good return on investment independent of symptom severity.

Protease activation, pancreatic leakage, and inflammation in acute pancreatitis: differences between mild and severe cases and changes over the first three days.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis (AP) may be studied using markers of protease activation (active carboxypeptidase B (aCAP), the activation peptide of carboxypeptidase B (CAPAP)), leakage of pancreatic enzymes (trypsinogen-2, procarboxypeptidase B (proCAP), amylase), and inflammation (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), CRP). METHODS: This prospective study included 140 cases of AP. Mild (n = 124) and severe (n = 16) cases were compared with respect to serum levels of trypsinogen-2, proCAP, amylase, aCAP, CAPAP (serum/urine), MCP-1 (serum/urine) and CRP on days 1, 2 and 3 from onset of symptoms. All patients with information on all 3 days were included in a time-course analysis (n = 44-55, except amylase: n = 27). RESULTS: High levels in severe versus mild cases were seen for trypsinogen-2, CAPAP in serum and urine, and MCP-1 in serum on days 1-3. No differences were seen for proCAP, amylase and aCAP. MCP-1 in urine was significantly elevated on day 1-2, and CRP on day 2-3. CAPAP and MCP-1 levels peaked early and stayed elevated for 48 h in serum. CONCLUSION: Protease activation and inflammation are early events in AP, with high levels of these markers within 24 h. Protease activation declines after 48 h, whereas inflammation is present for a longer time.

Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, active carboxypeptidase B and CAPAP at hospital admission are predictive markers for severe acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: CAPAP, the activation peptide of procarboxypeptidase B, is a predictor of severe acute pancreatitis (AP). Active carboxypeptidase (aCAP) may be a better predictor, as its turnover is slower. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) is an early inflammatory marker and increases before complications in severe AP. We conducted a cohort study to evaluate these markers as predictors for severe AP. METHOD: 140 patients with AP were included, retrospectively grouped as severe or mild by the Atlanta classification. CAPAP, MCP-1 and aCAP were analyzed in admission samples. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined high vs. low levels. RESULTS: The levels of all markers were significantly higher in patients with severe disease. High levels of serum MCP-1 was associated with a high risk of developing severe AP (OR 40.8; 95% CI 8.5-195). High ORs were also seen for urine MCP-1 (OR 7.3; 95% CI 2.2-24.3), serum CAPAP (OR 5.4; 95% CI 1.6-17.7), urine CAPAP (OR 4.8; 95% CI 1.6-14.2), and serum aCAP (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.2-11.3). CONCLUSION: Serum MCP-1 at admission was strongly associated with development of severe AP. MCP-1 in urine, CAPAP in serum and urine and aCAP may also be useful for predicting severe AP. and IAP.

Puromycin aminonucleoside damages the glomerular size barrier with minimal effects on charge density.

Puromycin aminonucleoside (PAN) has been suggested to reduce glomerular charge density, to create large glomerular "leaks," or not to affect the glomerular barrier. Therefore, we analyzed glomerular charge and size selectivity in vivo and in isolated kidneys perfused at 8 degrees C (cIPK) in control and PAN-treated rats. The fractional clearances (theta) for albumin and Ficoll of similar hydrodynamic size were 0.0017 +/- 0.0004 and 0.15 +/- 0.02, respectively, in control cIPKs. Two-pore analysis gave similar results in vivo and in vitro, with small- and large-pore radii of 47-52 and 85-105 A, respectively, in controls. Puromycin increased the number of large pores 40-50 times, the total pore area over diffusion distance decreased by a factor of 25-30, and the small-pore radius increased by 33% (P < 0.001 for all comparisons of size selectivity and theta). The effect of PAN was less dramatic on the estimated wall charge density, which was 73% of that of controls. We conclude that puromycin effectively destroys the glomerular size barrier with minimal effects on charge density.