Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oman Med J ; 35(2): e120, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32373349

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare functional and cosmetic satisfaction among male and female patients undergoing open and closed septorhinoplasty within sub-groups of indications for the surgery at a tertiary care hospital in Oman. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in the ear, nose, and throat surgery department at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital from 2010 to 2015. All patients aged above 17 years, without dysmorphic pathologies, and due to be operated through open or endonasal septorhinoplasty based on the appropriate indications (functional or cosmetic or functional and cosmetic), were included in the study. RESULTS: Out of 215 patients who underwent septorhinoplasty, 30 were lost to follow-up. One-hundred and eighty-five patients (124 males and 61 females) available for postoperative assessment had been allocated to septorhinoplasty by the endonasal approach (n = 89; 59 males and 30 females) or open approach (n = 96; 65 males and 31 females) based on their indications for surgery: functional (n = 98; 64 males and 34 females); cosmetic (n = 39; 23 males and 16 females); and both functional and cosmetic (n = 48; 37 males and 11 females). Sex-wise distribution across different age groups for the specific surgical technique based on indication for surgery did not show any significant differences within any of the respective sub-groups. Both sexes reported no significant difference in satisfaction per their scores on the functional satisfaction scale post open or endonasal intervention. However, in their cosmetic satisfaction scale scores, a significantly higher proportion of males within the functional indication for surgery subgroup (90.9%) expressed satisfaction with the open surgical approach than the 71.0% males operated by the endonasal approach (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Males undergoing septorhinoplasty for functional indications expressed significant satisfaction with the open surgical approach compared with the endonasal approach on the cosmetic satisfaction scale. This study could accrue only 185 patients during the five-year study period and hence was unable to generate any significant evidence to prove any differences in postoperative functional and cosmetic satisfaction outcomes within sub-groups based on other indications for surgery for males and females separately.

2.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 132: 109926, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32036167

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of the current universal neonatal hearing screening program in a tertiary medical institution in Oman, identify its limitations and drawbacks, and explore their causative factors. METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out to analyse the hearing screening of 12,743 live babies born between January 2016 and December 2018. Screen coverage, drop outs, follow up rate, and age at completion of screening, diagnosis, and intervention were analysed. The results were compared with the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) performance quality indices. Prospective questionnaire-based telephonic interviews were then conducted with the parents or caregivers of neonates with hearing loss. Finally, the causes of loss to follow up or delays in hearing screenings, diagnosis, and/or early intervention were studied. RESULTS: The true prevalence of hearing loss was 4.0 in 1000. The coverage of first-stage screening was 90% whereas the compliance with the second stage was 88.04%. 22.8% of the patients eventually obtained final diagnostic confirmation. The overall compliance with amplification was 30.2%. The completion ages of primary screening and final confirmation were 7.98 and 17.3 weeks respectively. The importance of hearing screening is well received by parents, but problems related to communication, delays in the appointment system, and inefficient follow up tracking were identified as the main limitations and drawbacks of the program. CONCLUSION: The coverage of the neonatal hearing screening program had not yet reached the required goal of 95%. The performance indicators also fell below the international benchmark. There is a need to address the identified causative factors. Effective communication and well-maintained tracking systems need to be implemented.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologia , Triagem Neonatal/normas , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Agendamento de Consultas , Cuidadores , Comunicação , Feminino , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Perda de Seguimento , Masculino , Triagem Neonatal/organização & administração , Omã/epidemiologia , Pais , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...