Osteoarticular TB specimen yield rates. Large joint analysis at a single centre.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains endemic in South Africa. The spine, hip, and knee joints are common extra-pulmonary TB sites. Sound history taking, clinical examination, and basic laboratory and pathological tests remain key important steps in osteoarticular TB diagnosis. In our resources-stricken context cost is everything, if we can make a diagnosis cheaply that would go a long way. The diagnostic yield of standard laboratory tests compared to a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for osteoarticular TB diagnosis in a single orthopaedic unit has not been analysed. We conducted a retrospective record review of extra-spinal osteoarticular TB infection at our hospital from 01 June 2016 to 31 December 2021. Patient demographics, clinical history, and laboratory test results were analysed. A total of 34 cases were identified, with 32 of the cases being articular and two osseous involvement. The knee was the most common joint affected followed hip joint. Acid Fast Bacilli were detected in 32% of cases with microscopy, while TB culture was positive in 29% of samples. Histopathological examination and real-time PCR diagnosed TB in 66% and 63% of the cases, respectively. Our findings suggest that in the right context of a suggestive history and examination, histological analysis is as good as PCR for diagnosing osteoarticular TB.

The unsolved problem of musculoskeletal hydatid disease: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Hydatidosis is a parasitic infection caused by Echinococcus granulosus and humans are usually an accidental intermediate host. Involvement of the musculoskeletal system is reported to occur in 0.5% to 4% of the cases. CASE PRESENTATION: We present our experience with two cases of musculoskeletal hydatidosis in black African patients that required orthopaedic surgical intervention. A 51-year-old black African female presented with right hip hydatid disease and a 37-year-old black African female presented with the disease affecting the left shoulder. Both patients presented with joint pain and reduced range of motion. The patient with involvement of the shoulder had a background history of human immunodeficiency virus, this was not present with the other patient. Diagnostic work-up confirmed peri-articular hydatid disease and both patients were surgically managed with arthroplasty. Post-operative complications encountered include hardware loosening from bone lysis and hardware failure. DISCUSSION: The medical literature describes a limited number of cases of peri-articular musculoskeletal hydatid disease. Patients are often subjected to many investigations, prolonged treatment periods and multiple surgeries. Concurrent use of medical and surgical treatment is advocated however, the choice of surgery is individualised. CONCLUSION: Hydatid disease must always feature in the differential diagnosis of multiple lytic bone lesions and radical surgical intervention may be required from the outset.