Social Media Posts About Carpal Tunnel Release: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patient and Surgeon Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Social media provides an increasingly popular, unfiltered source of perspectives on healthcare. The objective of this study is to characterize the landscape of social media posts regarding carpal tunnel release (CTR). METHODS: Content was queried from Instagram between February 2, 2019 to August 12, 2021 using the hashtags #carpaltunnelrelease and #carpaltunnelsurgery. The 1500 most-liked posts were analyzed. Poster demographics including age, gender, region, and symptom qualities and post characteristics including type, number, timing relative to surgery, tone, and satisfaction were collected. Categorical variables were compared utilizing chi-squared test. Univariate and multivariate regression were performed. RESULTS: The most popular post types included single photo (55.2%), multiple photos (18.8%), or single video (18.2%). Of all, 70.6% posts had fewer than 50 "likes." Patients accounted for 51.8% of posts, followed by surgeons (13.3%), other health care providers (11.7%), and physical therapists (8.8%). Women (66.7%) outnumbered men (33.3%). Fifty-five percent of posts were domestic. Posts mostly depicted postoperative care (85.6%). The most frequently mentioned symptoms were pain, burning, numbness, and tingling. Of all posts, 45.1% had a positive tone, 49.1% neutral, and 5.7% negative. Univariate analysis revealed that posters who were patients, underwent open CTR, and were female were more likely to post negative sentiments. CONCLUSIONS: Most posts regarding CTR are from patients, are postoperative, and are positive or neutral. Although rare, negative posts were more likely to originate from posters who are patients, female, or underwent open CTR. With this information, surgeons will be better prepared to address patient concerns, set patient expectations, and enter the social media themselves.

Underrepresentation of Non-White Participants in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Guidelines for Surgical Management of Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the racial and ethnic representation in studies included in the 2015 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Surgical Management of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline relative to their representation of the United States (US). METHODS: The demographic characteristics reported in articles included in the 2015 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Surgical Management of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline were analyzed. The primary outcome of interest was the representation quotient, which is the ratio of the proportion of a racial/ethnic group in the guideline studies relative to their proportion in the US. There were 211 studies included, of which 15 (7%) reported race. There were 35 studies based in the US and 7 of the US-based studies reported race. RESULTS: No US-based studies reported race and ethnicity separately, no studies reported American Indian/Alaska Native participants and no US-based studies reported Asian participants. The representation quotient of US-based studies was 0.66 for Black participants, 0.33 for Hispanic participants, and 1.30 for White participants, which indicates a relative over-representation of White participants compared to national proportions. CONCLUSION: This study illustrated that the evidence base for the surgical management of knee osteoarthritis has been constructed from studies which fail to consider race and ethnicity. Of those US-based studies which do report race or ethnicity, study cohorts do not reflect the US population. These results illustrate a disparity in clinical orthopedic surgical evidence and highlight the need for improved research recruitment strategies.

Microvascular Reconstruction of the Anterior Skull Base.

Anterior skull base defects present a unique reconstructive challenge. Risk factors such as previous operation, radiation and infection require a multidisciplinary approach to create a stable wound. Reconstructive microsurgery serves an important role when attempts with pericranial flap placement and nonvascularized graft obliteration fail. Our series analyzes the outcomes of 5 patients who underwent vascularized reconstruction of craniofacial defects at Northwestern Memorial Hospital from 2014-2021. Each patient presented with a complex, hostile scalp and bony wound. Common risk factors included previous craniotomy, failed obliteration, chemoradiation, osteomyelitis and epidural abscess. Patients underwent multi-stage procedures to obtain wound source control, reconstruct the frontal sinus and skull base, and frontal bone cranioplasty. Each patient underwent successful free flap reconstruction without flap loss or donor site complications. No patients suffered ongoing symptomatic CSF leak or pneumocephalus. However, only two patients have had sustained success with their alloplastic cranioplasty. A perfect, watertight seal is required to prevent seeding the implant and avoiding infection. Overall, free flap reconstruction of the skull base and frontal sinus is a necessary solution when patients fail more conservative locoregional options. Close collaboration with neurosurgery can help with diagnosis and establish the optimal timing for surgical care.

Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, database review. OBJECTIVES: Examine the utilization rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis and compare the incidence and severity of bleeding and thrombotic complications in elective spine surgery patients. METHODS: We utilized PearlDiver, a national orthopedics claims database. All patients who underwent elective spine surgery from 2007 to 2017 were included. Patients were stratified by the presence of DVT prophylaxis drug codes, then by comorbidities for postoperative bleeding/thrombosis. The severity of all bleeding and thrombotic complications in each cohort was studied, including the incidence of complications requiring operative washout, diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, intensive care unit admission, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 119 888 patients were included. The majority of patients (118 720, >99%) were not administered postoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis while a minority of patients (1168) were. The overall rates of bleeding and thrombotic complications within the population not receiving DVT prophylaxis were 1.96% and 2.45%, respectively (P < .001). The incidence of surgical intervention for a wound washout was 0.62% compared with 1.05% for pulmonary embolism (P < .001). Intensive care unit admission rates related to a wound washout procedure or pulmonary embolism also significantly differed (0.07% vs 0.34%, P < .001). There were no observed differences in mortality. When controlling for patient comorbidity, patients with atrial fibrillation, cancer, or a prior history of thrombotic complications experienced the greatest increased risks of postoperative thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: DVT prophylaxis is not routinely utilized following elective spine procedures. We report that there exist specific populations which may receive benefit from these practices, although further study is necessary to determine optimal prevention strategies for both thrombotic and bleeding complications in spine surgery.

Benchmarks of Duration and Magnitude of Opioid Consumption After Common Spinal Procedures: A Database Analysis of 47,823 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study performed in a nationwide insurance claims database. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine duration and magnitude of postoperative opioid prescriptions following common spinal procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative opioid prescription practices vary widely among providers and procedures and standards of care are not well-established. Previous work does not adequately quantify both duration and magnitude of opioid prescription. METHODS: Forty seven thousand eight hundred twenty three patients with record of any of four common spinal procedures in a nationwide insurance claims database were stratified by preoperative opioid use into three categories: "opioid naive," "sporadic user," or "chronic user," defined as 0, 1, or 2+ prescriptions filled in the 6 months preceding surgery. Those with record of subsequent surgery or readmission were excluded. Duration of opioid use was defined as the time between the index surgery and the last record of filling an opioid prescription. Magnitude of opioid use was defined as milligram morphine equivalents (MME) filled by 30 days post-op, converted to 5 mg oxycodone pills for interpretation. RESULTS: Opioid naive patients were less likely than chronic opioid users to fill any opioid prescription after surgery (63-68% naive vs. 91-95% chronic, P < 0.001), and when they did, their prescriptions were smaller in magnitude (76-91 pills naive vs. 127-152 pills chronic). One year after surgery, 15% to 18% of opioid naive and 50% to 64% of chronic opioid users continued filling prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Opioid naive patients use less postoperative opioids, and for a shorter period of time, than chronic users. This study serves as a normative benchmark for examining postoperative opioid use, which can assist providers in identifying patients with opioid dependence. Importantly, this work calls out the high risk of opioid exposure, as 15% to 18% of opioid naive patients continued filling opioid prescriptions 1 year after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Differing perceptions of preoperative communication among surgical team members.

BACKGROUND: Although preoperative communication is an emerging means through which surgical teams prepare for cases, little is known regarding its current state. This study investigated this topic in a survey of surgical team members. METHODS: An 11-question survey regarding the current state of and barriers to preoperative communication among surgical team members (surgeons, anesthesiologists, and surgical nurses and technologists) was distributed at a United States academic medical center utilizing the SurveyMonkey online questionnaire tool. Statistical analyses depended on variable type. RESULTS: The response rate was 49.4% (170 of 344 potential responses). All groups strongly agreed that preoperative communication contributes to health care quality and patient outcomes. Surgeons rated their satisfaction with the current state of preoperative communication more favorably than anesthesiologists (p < 0.05). Satisfaction ratings of the current state were suboptimal across groups. The most common selection for the current timing of preoperative communication across groups was before each case (29.4% of respondents) and for optimal timing, the day before a case (31.2%). The most frequently discussed topic across groups was reported to be operating room and nursing details (72.4% of respondents). The greatest barriers to preoperative communication across groups were thought to be a lack of a standard method of communication (52.4% of respondents), lack of time (51.8%), and difficulty in determining the assigned staff for a given case (50.0%). CONCLUSIONS: There exist differing perceptions of preoperative communication among surgical team members, which conveys an opportunity for improvement across groups. Coordination of the timing of preoperative communication and standardization of the discussed content could help mitigate current barriers.

Cages in ACDF are Associated With a Higher Nonunion Rate Than Allograft: A Stratified Comparative Analysis of 6130 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the rate of nonunion in patients treated with structural allograft and intervertebral cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Existing literature consists primarily of single-center studies with inconsistent findings. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 6130 patients registered in the PearlDiver national database through Humana Insurance from 2007 to 2016. All ACDF patients with anterior plating who were active in the database for at least 1 year were included in the study. Patients with a fracture history within 1 year of intervention, past arthrodesis of hand, foot, or ankle, or a planned posterior approach were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified by number of levels treated, tobacco use, and diabetic condition. Nonunion rates of structural allograft and intervertebral cage groups after 1 year were compared using Chi-squared analyses. RESULTS: Four thousand sixty-three patients were included in the allograft group, while 2067 were included in the cage group. Overall nonunion rates were significantly higher in the cage group (5.32%) than in allograft group (1.97%) (P < 0.01). When controlling for confounders, increased rates of nonunion were consistently observed in the cage group, achieving statistical significance in 25 of the 26 analyses. CONCLUSION: The increased rate of nonunion associated with intervertebral cages may suggest the superiority of allograft over cages in ACDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.