The impact of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation on the mortality of poor-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an intent-to-transplant analysis.

Purpose of this single-centre retrospective study was to assess the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for relapsed/refractory (r/r) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) by intent-to-transplant (ITT). Included were all consecutive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) for whom a donor search was performed between 2004 and 2018. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) measured from search initiation. A donor search was initiated for 189 patients (DLBCL 61, FL 32, MCL 43, and PTCL 53), with 76% of the patients having active disease. OS at 5 years after search initiation for DLBCL, FL, MCL, and PTCL was 26%, 44%, 52%, and 50%, respectively. AlloHCT was performed in 137 patients (72%; DLBCL 64%). Main reason for not undergoing alloHCT was disease progression, whereas donor unavailability accounted for only 4% of pretransplantation failures. These results suggest that survival of patients with r/r NHL entering the alloHCT route may be overestimated by a factor of 1.2-1.4 if based on actually transplanted patients only. This effect should be taken into account when using alloHCT as benchmark for new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of poor-risk NHL.

CAR T cells or allogeneic transplantation as standard of care for advanced large B-cell lymphoma: an intent-to-treat comparison.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment has evolved as standard of care (SOC) for multiply relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, its potential benefit over allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) remains unclear. We compared outcomes with both types of cellular immunotherapy (CI) by intention to treat (ITT). Eligble were all patients with R/R LBCL and institutional tumor board decision recommending SOC CAR T-cell treatment between July 2018 and February 2020, or alloHCT between January 2004 and February 2020. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) from indication. Altogether, 41 and 60 patients for whom CAR T cells and alloHCT were intended, respectively, were included. In both cohorts, virtually all patients had active disease at indication. CI was recommended as part of second-line therapy for 21 alloHCT patients but no CAR T-cell patients. Median OS from indication was 475 days with CAR T cells vs 285 days with alloHCT (P = .88) and 222 days for 39 patients for whom alloHCT beyond second line was recommended (P = .08). Of CAR T-cell and alloHCT patients, 73% and 65%, respectively, proceeded to CI. After CI, 12-month estimates for nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, and OS for CAR T cells vs alloHCT were 3% vs 21% (P = .04), 59% vs 44% (P = .12), 39% vs 33% (P = .97), and 68% vs 54% (P = .32), respectively. In conclusion, CAR T-cell outcomes were not inferior to alloHCT outcomes, whether measured by ITT or from CI administration, supporting strategies preferring CAR T cells over alloHCT as first CI for multiply R/R LBCL.

Outcome after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: For more than two decades, high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) were treatment options for patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL). However, the ideal timing and the collective patient benefits are still being debated. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 163 patients with B-NHL who received an HDT protocol followed by ABSCT between 2001 and 2007. Patients were analyzed according to the time point of HDT/ABSCT to compare upfront (directly after induction, n = 72, 44%) versus secondary transplantation (at first relapse, n = 91, 56%). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 100% and 94% after upfront and secondary HDT/ABSCT, respectively. No significant differences were found for hematopoietic recovery and toxicity profile. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probability were found to be significantly higher in the upfront HDT/ABSCT treatment group (P = .018 and P = .004). In multivariate analysis, upfront HDT/ABSCT and low IPI risk score had a significant beneficial effect on OS (P = .031 and P = .019). CONCLUSION: HDT and ABSCT directly after induction chemotherapy were confirmed to be feasible with high PFS and OS rates. In addition, for patients with relapse after first-line therapy and consecutively poor prognosis, HDT/ABSCT also offers an effective treatment strategy.

Combined phase I/II study of imexon (AOP99.0001) for treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Imexon [AOP99.0001 (4-imino-1,3-diazobicyclo[3. 1. 0]-hexan-2-one)] belongs to a novel class of promising anticancer agents that induce tumor apoptosis through oxidative stress. Clinical experience since the late 1960s has provided initial evidence for a clinical antitumor activity. Our open-label, multicenter phase I clinical trial was designed to further investigate the adverse event (AEs) profile and pharmacokinetics of AOP99.0001 in pretreated myeloma patients and collect initial data on the potential clinical efficacy in this indication. Thirty-six patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma, who had been pretreated with at least two lines of therapy earlier, were included. Imexon was applied intravenously on 5 consecutive days for 2 weeks (d1-5 and d8-12) for a 3-week cycle. The plasma half-life of AOP99.0001 and its active metabolite AOP99.0002 was found to be approximately 1.2 and 2.6 h, respectively. The mean duration of treatment with Imexon was 6.8 weeks in a dose range between 50 and 1000 mg/m without reaching dose-limiting toxicity. Drug-related AEs occurring with a frequency of greater than 10% were fatigue, nausea, constipation, headache, asthenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia and creatinine increase. A total of nine severe adverse events occurred in three patients. No mortality was encountered when patients were on treatment with Imexon. Preliminary antimyeloma efficacy of AOP99.0001 was observed with 1 minimal response, 12 (36%) stable disease responses, and all other evaluable patients had progressive disease. Remarkably, the patient with minimal response also experienced a complete clinical resolution of myeloma-associated polyneuropathy. Overall, Imexon was safe and well tolerated in the dose range investigated. Imexon showed minor clinical activity as a single agent in heavily pretreated myeloma patients. On account of its unique mechanism of action, favorable toxicity profile, initial clinical evidence for antimyeloma activity, and its known synergistic activity in combination with approved agents for myeloma treatment, AOP99.0001 is recommended for future clinical studies in combination regimens in multiple myeloma.

A combination of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor mobilizes more primitive peripheral blood progenitor cells than G-CSF alone: results of a European phase II study.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Previous studies in xenograft models have shown that human peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) mobilized with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor (AMD3100) have a higher bone marrow (BM) reconstitution potential than granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized PBPC. METHODS: PBPC obtained during G-CSF-supported mobilization before and after a supplementary administration of AMD3100 from patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=15; phase II study) were investigated for co-expression of primitive and lineage-associated markers, their proliferative activity in vitro and repopulation potential after clinical transplantation. RESULTS: A significant increase in primitive CD34+ CD38(-) cells was observed in intraindividual comparisons of all patients after administration of G-CSF+AMD3100 (peripheral blood: median 8-fold, range 2,4-fold - 39-fold) compared with G-CSF alone. Using a long-term culture-initiating cell assay, this increase was confirmed. After transplantation of G-CSF+AMD3100-mobilized PBPC, the time to leukocyte reconstitution > 1 x 10(3)/microL and platelet reconstitution > 2 x 10(4)/microL was 14 (10-19 days) and 13 days (10-15 days), respectively. A complete and stable hematologic reconstitution (platelets > 1.5 x 10(5)/microL) was observed in 91% of all patients within 35 days. CONCLUSIONS: An additional application of AMD3100 to a standard G-CSF mobilization regimen leads to a significant increase in primitive PBPC with high repopulation capacity.

Reduced CD4+,CD25- T cell sensitivity to the suppressive function of CD4+,CD25high,CD127 -/low regulatory T cells in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: CD4+,CD25high regulatory T (Treg) cells play a crucial role in the maintenance of self tolerance and prevention of organ-specific autoimmunity. The presence of many in vivo-preactivated CD4+,CD25++ T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) poses a difficulty in discriminating CD25++ activated T cells from CD25high Treg cells. To overcome this problem, we analyzed the phenotype and function of CD4+,CD25high,CD127(-/low) natural Treg (nTreg) cells isolated from the peripheral blood of patients with SLE. METHODS: CD4+,CD25high,CD127(-/low) nTreg cells and CD4+,CD25- responder T (Tresp) cells from patients with SLE and normal donors were separated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Cell proliferation was quantified by 3H-thymidine incorporation, and immunophenotyping of the cells was done using FACScan. RESULTS: Comparable percentages of CD4+,CD25high,FoxP3+ T cells were observed in patients with SLE and normal donors. Proliferation of SLE nTreg cells sorted into the subset CD4+,CD25high,CD127(-/low) was significantly decreased compared with that of SLE nTreg cells sorted into the subset CD4+,CD25high (mean +/- SEM 2,223 +/- 351 counts per minute versus 9,104 +/- 1,720 cpm, respectively), while in normal donors, these values were 802 +/- 177 cpm and 2,028 +/- 548 cpm, respectively, confirming that effector cell contamination was reduced. Notably, the suppressive activity of nTreg cells was intact in all groups. However, CD4+,CD25- Tresp cells isolated from patients with active SLE were significantly less sensitive than those from patients with inactive SLE to the suppressive function of autologous or normal donor CD4+,CD25high,CD127(-/low) nTreg cells. Furthermore, a significant inverse correlation was observed between the extent of T cell regulation in suppressor assays and the level of lupus disease activity. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to show that, in human SLE, impaired sensitivity of Tresp cells to the suppressive effects of a comparably functional, highly purified nTreg cell population leads to a defective suppression of T cell proliferation in active SLE. Studies aiming to define the mechanisms leading to Tresp cell resistance might help in the development of highly specific, alternative immunotherapeutic tools for the control of systemic autoimmune diseases such as SLE.

Kinetics of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization following G-CSF-supported chemotherapy.

It would be a clinical and economical advantage if the optimal time point of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization following G-CSF-supported chemotherapy (CT) was known in advance. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed mobilization parameters in 113 adult tumor patients treated in our institution within 1 year. The start of apheresis was guided by CD34(+) cell measurements in the PB and occurred on or after day 11 after start of mobilization CT in 97% of patients. The median peak (p)CD34(+) cell count in PB uniformly occurred on day 14-15 (range: 6-32 days) after the start of CT, irrespective of the diagnosis (multiple myeloma n = 76, other histology n = 37), the type, but not the amount, of premobilization CT or radiotherapy (RT), the mobilization regimen, or the G-CSF dosage administered. Among more heavily pretreated patients (>six cycles of prior CT or RT), a higher proportion mobilized late (pCD34(+) cell count later than day 20 in 12% and 13%, respectively, versus 2%-5% in the other groups). Therefore, we propose to start measuring CD34(+) cells in the PB on day 11 after the start of mobilization therapy. The wide range of optimal mobilization time points argues for an individualized rather than a preset start of apheresis.