RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gadolinium-based contrast agents can be used to identify the blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening after inducing a focused ultrasound (FUS) cavitation effect in the presence of microbubbles. However, the use of gadolinium may be limited for frequent routine monitoring of the BBB opening in clinical applications. PURPOSE: To use a gradient-echo sequence without contrast agent administration for monitoring of acoustic cavitation. STUDY TYPE: Animal and phantom prospective. PHANTOM/ANIMAL MODEL: Static and flowing gel phantoms; six normal adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, 7T; fast low-angle shot sequence. ASSESSMENT: Burst FUS with acoustic pressures = 1.5, 2.2, 2.8 MPa; pulse repetition frequencies = 1, 10,100 Hz; and duty cycles = 2%, 5%, 10% were transmitted to the chamber of a static phantom with microbubble concentrations = 10%, 1%, 0.1%. MR slice thicknesses = 3, 6, 8 mm were acquired. In flowing phantom experiments, 0.1%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1% microbubbles were infused and transmitted by burst FUS with an acoustic pressure = 0.4 and 1 MPa. In in vivo experiments, 0.25% microbubbles was infused and 0.8 MPa burst FUS was transmitted to targeted brain tissue beneath the superior sagittal sinus. The mean signal intensity (SI) was normalized using the mean SI from pre-FUS. STATISTICAL TESTS: Two-tailed Student's t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the static phantom, the time courses of normalized SI decreases to minimum SI levels of 70-80%. In the flowing phantom, substantial normalized SI of 160-230% was present with variant acoustic pressures and microbubble concentrations. Compared with in vivo control rats, the brain tissue of experimental rats with transmission of FUS pulses exhibited considerable decreases of normalized SI (P < 0.001) because of the cavitation-induced perturbation of flow. DATA CONCLUSION: Observing gradient-echo SI changes can help monitor the targeted location of microbubble-enhanced FUS, which in turn assists the monitoring of the BBB opening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:311-318.
Assuntos
Barreira Hematoencefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Meios de Contraste , Gadolínio , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Microbolhas , Sonicação/métodos , Acústica , Animais , Masculino , Modelos Animais , Imagens de Fantasmas , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-DawleyRESUMO
The high quality properties and benefits of graphene-oxide have generated an active area of research where many investigations have shown potential applications in various technological fields. This paper proposes a methodology for enhancing the pyro-electricity of PVDF by graphene-oxide doping. The PVDF film with graphene-oxide is prepared by the sol-gel method. Firstly, PVDF and graphene-oxide powders are dispersed into dimethylformamide as solvent to form a sol solution. Secondly, the sol solution is deposited on a flexible ITO/PET substrate by spin-coating. Thirdly, the particles in the sol solution are polymerized through baking off the solvent to produce a gel in a state of a continuous network of PVDF and graphene-oxide. The final annealing process pyrolyzes the gel and form a ß-phase PVDF film with graphene-oxide doping. A complete study on the process of the graphene oxide doping of PVDF is accomplished. Some key points about the process are addressed based on experiments. The solutions to some key issues are found in this work, such as the porosity of film, the annealing temperature limitation by the use of flexible PET substrate, and the concentrations of PVDF and graphene-oxide.