Association between anesthesia technique and death after hip fracture repair for patients with COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Patients with COVID-19 undergoing hip fracture surgeries have a 30-day mortality of up to 34%. We aimed to evaluate the association between anesthesia technique and 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: After ethics approval, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set from January to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 19 yr, laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 14 days preoperatively, and hip fracture surgery under general anesthesia (GA) or spinal anesthesia (SA). Exclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status V, ventilator dependence, international normalized ratio ≥ 1.5, partial thromboplastin time > 35 sec, and platelet count < 80 × 109 L-1. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. The adjusted association between anesthetic technique and 30-day mortality was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 23,045 patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, 331 patients met the study criteria. The median [interquartile range] age was 82 [74-88] yr, and 32.3% were male. The 30-day mortality rate was 10.0% (33/331) for the cohort (10.7%, 29/272 for GA vs 6.8%, 4/59 for SA; P = 0.51; standardized mean difference, 0.138). The use of SA, compared with GA, was not associated with decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 1.8; E-value, 2.49). CONCLUSION: Anesthesia technique was not associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 undergoing hip fracture surgery. The findings were limited by a small sample size. STUDY REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT05133648); registered 24 November 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les personnes atteintes de COVID-19 bénéficiant d'une chirurgie de fracture de la hanche ont une mortalité à 30 jours allant jusqu'à 34 %. Notre objectif était d'évaluer l'association entre la technique d'anesthésie et la mortalité à 30 jours après une chirurgie de fracture de la hanche chez les personnes atteintes de COVID-19. MéTHODE: Après l'approbation du comité d'éthique, nous avons réalisé une analyse de cohorte rétrospective de l'ensemble de données du Programme national d'amélioration de la qualité chirurgicale de l'American College of Surgeons de janvier à décembre 2021. Les critères d'inclusion étaient un âge ≥ 19 ans, une infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 confirmée en laboratoire dans les 14 jours préopératoires et une chirurgie de fracture de la hanche sous anesthésie générale (AG) ou rachianesthésie (RA). Les critères d'exclusion étaient un statut physique V selon l'American Society of Anesthesiologists, la dépendance à une assistance ventilatoire, un ratio international normalisé ≥ 1,5, un temps de thromboplastine partielle > 35 sec, et une numération plaquettaire < 80 × 109 L−1. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la mortalité à 30 jours toutes causes confondues. L'association ajustée entre la technique anesthésique et la mortalité à 30 jours a été analysée à l'aide d'une régression logistique multivariée. RéSULTATS: Sur 23 045 patient·es opéré·es pour une fracture de la hanche, 331 répondaient aux critères de l'étude. L'âge médian (écart interquartile) était de 82 [74­88] ans et 32,3 % étaient des hommes. Le taux de mortalité à 30 jours était de 10,0 % (33/331) pour la cohorte (10,7 %, 29/272 pour l'AG vs 6,8 %, 4/59 pour la RA; P = 0,51; différence moyenne standardisée, 0,138). L'utilisation de la RA, par rapport à l'AG, n'a pas été associée à une diminution de la mortalité (rapport de cotes ajusté, 0,61; intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 0,21 à 1,8; valeur E, 2,49). CONCLUSION: La technique d'anesthésie n'a pas été associée à la mortalité chez les personnes atteintes de COVID-19 bénéficiant d'une chirurgie de fracture de la hanche. Les résultats ont été limités par la petite taille de l'échantillon. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05133648); enregistrée le 24 novembre 2021.

Using Empathetic CAre and REsponse (ECARE) in improving empathy and confidence among nursing and medical students when managing dangerous, aggressive and violent patients in the clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: The use of physical restraint to curtail dangerous or extremely disruptive behaviours in patients has been an established practice to help ensuring safety in healthcare providers' work environment. However, many have deemed it unnecessary and overused with reported negligence on patients' basic needs during its implementation. Studies have shown that having empathy and non-judgmental attitudes are vital in reducing and eliminating the use of restraint. OBJECTIVES: To explore whether experiential learning will improve empathy and confidence, among nursing and medical students when managing dangerous, aggressive, and violent patients. DESIGN: A pre- and post-test, same group quasi-experimental design was used to explore the effectiveness of using the Empathetic CAre and REsponse (ECARE), an experiential learning session to equip nursing and medical students on managing dangerous, aggressive, and violent patients. Outcome measures include students' confidence when using verbal de-escalation, physical and chemical restraint techniques. Empathy scores were also compared. SETTINGS: A University offering both medical and nursing program from undergraduate to postgraduate level. PARTICIPANTS: 249 nursing and 50 medical students undergoing the mental health nursing module in Year 2 of their nursing program and psychiatry rotation in Year 3 of their medical education. RESULTS: Results showed that, for both student populations, the empathy and confidence scores significantly improved after attending ECARE. ANCOVA conducted on the post-intervention Jefferson empathy score between the populations with an adjusted baseline score revealed a statistically significant adjusted mean difference between them. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that experiential learning could improve the learners' empathy through the integration of hands-on learning. This in turn could enhance future healthcare professionals' care quality. Experiential learning opportunities should be incorporated into existing pedagogies as this helps to improve students' confidence in managing dangerous, aggressive and violent patients, reducing the use of physical restraint, thereby enhancing the quality of patient care.

Smartphone applications for the treatment of depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis and qualitative review.

BACKGROUND: Emerging research indicates that the use of smartphone mental health applications (apps) could be used as an adjunctive therapy for individuals with depression, especially those who have difficulty accessing conventional therapies. The adoption and ownership of smartphone technology continues to increase in developed and developing nations, and could provide widespread and cost-effective evidence-based treatments for depressive symptoms. METHODS: The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to quantitatively evaluate the effects of smartphone mental health app interventions on depressive symptoms. Identified studies were qualitatively reviewed to address the following secondary objectives: (1) identify the types of smartphone apps currently being used to target depression; (2) identify factors associated with positive response to smartphone apps in depression; (3) provide directives for future research and app development; and (4) characterize the therapeutic opportunity of smartphone app interventions among individuals with depression. RESULTS: The results indicate that there may be some therapeutic opportunity with smartphone interventions as an adjunctive treatment for depression. In particular, we observed a small effect in favor of smartphone app interventions for reducing depressive symptoms. However, because of the significant heterogeneity across studies, continued research among more homogenous samples is warranted to determine whether these interventions might have larger (ie, more clinically relevant) effects in specific subpopulations and/or whether specific app characteristics produce larger effects. CONCLUSIONS: The current study highlights some key areas of priority going forward, particularly concerning the design of future studies and the development of novel technologies with a user-centered focus.

Update on Medications in Schizophrenia

Antipsychotics are a pharmacologically heterogeneous group of compounds, but all act as D2 dopamine receptor antagonists, an action linked to their antipsychotic effect. Today, sixty years on since 1952, we have the FGAs and the SGAs. These medications continue to be useful, and continue to have some troubling adverse effects. As a class, the FGAs are more likely to be associated with EPS but this is primarily true of medications that bind tightly with D2 neuroreceptors, such as haloperidol, and less true of medications that bind weakly, such as chlorpromazine. Anticholinergic effects are especially prominent with weaker-binding FGAs, as well as with the SGA clozapine. As a class, the SGAs, especially clozapine and olanzapine generally tend to cause more problems relating to the metabolic syndrome, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. All antipsychotic medications are associated with an increased likelihood of sedation, sexual dysfunction, postural hypotension, prolonged QT interval and sudden death. Primary care physicians need to be familiar with the individual adverse effect profiles of these medications.