Similar efficacy and safety between lenvatinib versus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab(A + B) have been used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as first-line therapy. Real-world studies comparison of efficacy and safety in these two regimens are limited, we therefore conduct this study to investigate these issues. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients received lenvatinib (n = 46) and A + B (n = 46) as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC in a tertiary medical center. Objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed for baseline clinical features balance. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients with median age of 63.8 year-old, 78.3% male, 85.9% viral hepatitis infected, 67.4% BCLC stage C were enrolled. The median treatment and follow-up duration were 4.7 months and 9.4 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in ORR (26.1% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.1226), PFS (5.9 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.4066), and OS (not reached vs. not reached, p = 0.7128) between the lenvatinib and A + B groups. After IPW, the results of survival and response rate were also compared. Subgroup analysis suggested that using lenvatinib was not inferior to A + B in regards of PFS, including those with elder, Child-Pugh class B, beyond up-to-seven, or portal vein invasion VP4 patients. Among the lenvatinib treated patients, multivariate analysis showed patients elder than 65-year-old was an independent predictor associated with shorter PFS (adjust HR: 2.085[0.914-4.753], p = 0.0213). The incidence rates of adverse events were similar between two groups (76 vs. 63%, p = 0.1740). Both of two regimens had similarly few impact on liver function by comparison of baseline, third month, and sixth month albumin-bilirubin index and Child-Pugh score. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib are similar to A + B as a first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC.

Albumin and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Score in Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: Comparison With Prognostic Nutritional Index.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal cancer is often overwhelming due to its toxic effects. This study aimed to establish a prognostic indicator based on pretreatment albumin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio score (ANS) in comparison to the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in patients with esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 123 patients who received neoadjuvant CCRT for esophageal cancer were prospectively and consecutively recruited between August 2016 and December 2017 from three medical institutes in Taiwan. Patients were assigned to ANS 0, 1, and 2 groups based on their pretreatment albumin and NLR values. ANS and PNI performances were compared for prediction of survival outcome. RESULTS: Compared with ANS 0 (39 patients) and ANS 1 (51 patients), ANS 2 (33 patients) cases showed worse overall survival (hazard ratio=2.96; 95% confidence interval=1.45-6.05; log-rank p=0.003; hazard ratio=3.79; 95% confidence interval=1.79-8.02, p<0.001, respectively). ANS had better performance in overall survival evaluation and discrimination ability than PNI and individual albumin and NLR. Patients in the ANS 0, 1, and 2 had radiotherapy incompletion rates of 2.6%, 3.9%, and 18.2%, respectively, and chemotherapy incompletion rates of 5.1%, 7.8%, and 30.3%, respectively. Patients in the ANS 2 group were significantly associated with a higher incidence of infection (30.3%) than those in the ANS 0 (10.3%) and ANS 1 groups (9.8%). CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment ANS was significantly associated with CCRT safety profiles, CCRT completion rate, and survival outcome in patients with esophageal cancer with excellent performance compared to PNI and NLR.

Combination of CRAFITY score with Alpha-fetoprotein response predicts a favorable outcome of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab are promising agents for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We tried to guide the treatment based on recent developed CRAFITY score combining with on-treatment AFP response. Eighty-nine patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab regardless of as a first-line therapy or not for unresectable HCC were enrolled for analyses. Radiologic evaluation was based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 25.0% and 65.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that low CRAFITY score (AFP<100 ng/ml or CRP<10 mg/l) and satisfactory AFP response at 6 weeks (≥75% decrease or ≤10% increase from baseline) were independent factors determining good overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.143, P=0.002 & HR=0.337, P=0.031), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.419, P=0.022 & HR=0.429, P=0.025) and good responder (odds ratio [OR]=1.763, P=0.044 & OR=3.881, P=0.011). Patients were further divided into three classes by combination of CRAFITY score and AFP response at 6 weeks [The CAR (CRAFITY score and AFP-Response) classification)]: low CRAFITY score with satisfactory AFP response at 6 weeks (class I), either high CRAFITY score or unsatisfactory AFP response at 6 weeks (class II) and high CRAFITY score together with unsatisfactory AFP response at 6 weeks (class III). ORR was 35.0%, 18.2%, and 0% in class I, II and III patients, respectively (overall P=0.034). Patients in the class I had the best OS and PFS, followed by class II and class III (median OS: not reached vs. 11.1 vs. 4.3 months, log-rank P<0.001; median PFS: 7.9 vs. 6.6 vs. 2.6 months, log-rank P=0.001). Combination CRAFITY score and AFP response at 6 weeks with AUROC predicts OS and tumor response to be 0.809 and 0.798, respectively, better than either CRAFITY score (0.771 & 0.750) or AFP response at 6 weeks (0.725 & 0.680) alone. In conclusions, the CAR classification which combining CRAFITY score and AFP response at 6 weeks provides a practical guidance for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy in unresectable HCC patients.

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cisplatin with 5-fluouracil (Cis/5Fu) and paclitaxel with carboplatin (Pac/Car) are common regimens used in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). Here, we aimed to compare the survival outcomes and treatment-related toxicities between these regimens in neoadjuvant CCRT in patients with locally advanced EC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-six patients with locally advanced EC (98% squamous cell carcinoma) were prospectively recruited between 2016 and 2017 in a non-randomized manner. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the chemotherapeutic agents administered (Pac/Car group, n=87; Cis/5Fu group, n=47) in CCRT to compare the survival outcome and severe adverse event (sAE) incidence. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (85.7%) and 80 patients (91.4%) in the Cis/5Fu and Pac/Car groups completed pre-planned CCRT (p=0.26), respectively. The Cis/5Fu group presented a higher incidence of non-hematological sAE than the Pac/Car group (69.45% vs. 51.7%, p=0.049). Patients in the Pac/Car group showed a higher rate of surgical resection than those in the Cis/5Fu group (49.4% vs. 22.4%, p<0.001). After a median follow-up duration of 22.0 months (range=1.9-31.8), the 2-year survival rate was 56.9% for patients in the Pac/Car group and 28.7% for the Cis/5Fu group. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival was 0.45 (95%CI=0.28-0.72, p=0.001) in the comparison between the groups. CONCLUSION: Overall, neoadjuvant CCRT with Pac/Car is associated with a better survival outcome, higher surgical resection rate, and better safety profiles than Cis/5Fu in patients with locally advanced EC.

Impact of Frailty on Treatment Outcome in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The clinical significance of frailty status on treatment outcome in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) has been seldom explored. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pretreatment frailty on treatment-related toxicity and survival outcome in patients with EC undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥20 years and with newly diagnosed locally advanced EC receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy with weekly administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel for 5 weeks were prospectively enrolled. A pretreatment frailty assessment was performed within 7 days before CCRT initiation. The primary endpoint was treatment-related toxicity and complications of CCRT while the secondary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were enrolled, 41 (47%) and 46 (53%) of whom were allocated in the frail and fit group, respectively. Frail patients had a significantly higher incidence of having at least one severe hematological adverse event (63.4% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001), higher risk of emergent room visiting [relative risk 3.72; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.39-9.91; p=0.009] and hospitalization (relative risk 3.85; 95% CI=1.03-11.2; p=0.013) during the course of CCRT, when compared to fit patients. Overall survival showed significant worsening in the frail group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=2.12; 95% CI=1.01-4.42; p=0.046]. CONCLUSION: Frailty is associated with increase of treatment-related toxicities and poor survival outcome in EC patients undergoing CCRT. Our study suggested that pretreatment frailty assessment is imperative to serve as a predictor and prognostic factor for all adult patients with EC undergoing CCRT.

Alpha-fetoprotein response at different time-points is associated with efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nivolumab monotherapy has a modest objective response rate (ORR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To overcome the lack of biomarkers that predict delayed alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response beyond 4 weeks, we applied a novel 50-10 rule of AFP response for unresectable HCC patients under nivolumab monotherapy and proposed an algorithm based on on-treatment AFP reduction at different time-points. Ninety unresectable HCC patients who underwent nivolumab monotherapy in 2015-2019 were retrospectively recruited and divided into four classes: rapid AFP decrease of ≥ 50% of baseline at week 4 (class I), AFP changes within ± 50% of baseline at week 4 that later decreased to ≥ 10% of baseline (class II) or not (class III) at week 12, and rapid AFP increase of ≥ 50% of baseline at week 4 (class IV). ORR was 47.4%, 36.0%, 7.7%, and 5.0% in class I-IV patients, respectively. Rapid (class I) and delayed (class II) AFP responders had significantly higher ORR, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than non-responders (class III and IV) (ORR: 40.9% vs. 6.5%, P<0.001; median OS: not reached vs. 9.6 months, log-rank P<0.001; median PFS: 9.6 vs. 2.8 months, log-rank P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, AFP response was an independent factor associated with good OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.301, P=0.001) and PFS (HR=0.332, P<0.001). Moreover, AFP responders had higher ORR and better OS as well as PFS than non-responders, regardless of nivolumab as a first- or more than a second-line therapy (all P<0.05). In conclusion, the novel 50-10 rule of AFP response provides practical guidance for nivolumab monotherapy in unresectable HCC patients. However, this algorithm remains to be verified in a large prospective cohort.

Response evaluation for immunotherapy through semi-automatic software based on RECIST 1.1, irRC, and iRECIST criteria: comparison with subjective assessment.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression is difficult to diagnose in patients undergoing immunotherapy. Subjective response assessment is still common in clinical practice. PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), immune-related response criteria (irRC), and modified RECIST 1.1 for immunotherapy (iRECIST) through semi-automatic software, and to compare iRECIST-based response evaluation with subjective assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The best overall response of each patient based on RECIST 1.1, irRC, and iRECIST was determined on CT scans through semi-automatic software and the differences between the criteria were evaluated. Criteria-based response evaluation through semi-automatic software was compared with subjective assessment on radiology report by correlating the best overall response to overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were included (five patients with melanoma, 12 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, and four patients with hepatocellular carcinoma). Two patients with progressive disease by RECIST 1.1 but non-progressive disease by irRC and iRECIST eventually experienced tumor response and had favorable outcomes, indicating pseudoprogression. The survival difference between patients with non-progressive disease and progressive disease was better stratified through iRECIST-based response evaluation (P = 0.078) than that through subjective assessment (P = 0.501). CONCLUSION: Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy may be captured through semi-automatic software utilizing irRC or iRECIST criteria. iRECIST-based response evaluation may provide a better survival stratification compared with subjective assessment.

Biochemotherapy with carmustine, cisplatin, dacarbazine, tamoxifen and low-dose interleukin-2 for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The toxicity and efficacy of biochemotherapy with low-dose interleukin-2 for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) were studied. METHOD: Metastatic chemo-naive MM patients were given biochemotherapy (BCDT regimen) with carmustine (BCNU), cisplatin (CDDP), dacarbazine (DTIC), and tamoxifen and interleukin-2 (IL-2) 18 Million International Units in divided doses by subcutaneous injection three times a week for four weeks. BCDT consisted of BCNU (150 mg/m2, day l every 8 weeks), CDDP (25 mg/m2, days l-3 every 4 weeks), DTIC (220 mg/m2, days 1-3 every 4 weeks) and tamoxifen 10 mg twice a day. Treatment was repeated for a total of 6 cycles, or until disease progression or unbearable toxicity. RESULTS: From Nov 2001 to July 2005, 40 patients (20 men; 20 women) were enrolled. Their median age was 54 years (range 22-79 years). Subtypes of melanoma included 23 (57.5%) acral lentiginous, 11 (27.5%) nodular, 1 (2.5%) mucosal, and 5 (12.5%) others. Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (27.5%), anemia (45%), and thrombocytopenia (40%). Constitutional IL-2 toxicities included indurate injection site (57.5%), fever (60%), chills (55%), itchy skin (42.5%), bone pain (32.5%) and myalgia (45%). Grade 1-2 hypotension was noted in 12.5% of patients. Eosinophilia (range 5% to 71%) was evident in 72.5% of patients. The response rate was 32.5% including 5% with a complete response, 27.5% with a partial response, and 17.5% with stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% CI: 2.9~9.6 months). The median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI: 7.0~15.6 months). Five patients (12.5%) who presented with oligo-metastasis achieved five-year survivals. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that low-dose IL-2 plus BCDT is tolerable. A durable response and long-term survival can be achieved in a small subgroup of patients.