Peripheral CD56+CD16+ NK Cell Populations in the Early Follicular Phase Are Associated With Successful Clinical Outcomes of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Women With Repeated Implantation Failure.

The percentage of peripheral CD56+CD16+ NK cells in the early follicular phase on days 2-3 of the menstrual cycle in repeated implantation failure (RIF) patients was used to evaluate the impact of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on ART cycles. A total 283 patients with RIF consisting of at least 3 ART failures and at least 2 high quality embryo transfers were recruited. A logistic regression analysis for the peripheral immunological profile was completed to predict implantation success and compare the implantation and pregnancy rates between groups with ≤10.6 and >10.6% of CD56+CD16+ NK cells in the early follicular phase. The logistic regression and receiving operating curve analyses showed that patients with ≤ 10.6% of peripheral CD56+CD16+ NK cells in the early follicular phase showed a lower pregnancy rate within the RIF group without IVIG. Patients with peripheral CD56+CD16+ NK cells ≤ 10.6% and without IVIG treatment showed significantly lower implantation and pregnancy rates (12.3 and 30.3%, respectively) when compared with the CD56+CD16+ NK cells >10.6% group (24.9 and 48.0%, respectively, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the patients with CD56+CD16+ NK cells ≤ 10.6% given IVIG starting before ET had significantly higher implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates (27.5, 57.4, and 45.6%, respectively) when compared with the non-IVIG group (12.3, 30.3, and 22.7%, respectively, p < 0.05). Our results showed that a low percentage of peripheral CD56+CD16+ NK cells (≤10.6%) in the early follicular phase is a potential indicator of reduced pregnancy and implantation success rates in RIF patients, and IVIG treatment will likely benefit this patient subgroup.

Effects of growth hormone plus gonadotropins on controlled ovarian stimulation in infertile women of advanced age, poor responders, and previous in vitro fertilization failure patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of growth hormone (GH) cotreatment in ovarian stimulation in infertile women of advanced age, poor responders, and patients with one or more previous IVF treatment failures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of 436 patients undergoing GH cotreatment in ovarian stimulation. The first arm included 134 infertile women of advanced age. The second arm included 236 patients with one or more IVF previous treatment failures, and the third arm included 66 younger poor responders. Main outcome measures were the number of oocytes and embryos, quality of embryos, and implantation and pregnancy rates. RESULTS: In infertile women of advanced age, GH plus ovarian stimulation yielded no statistical differences in the numbers of oocytes and embryos, quality of embryo, and rates of implantation and pregnancy. In the second arm, the mature oocyte number (8.2 vs. 6.8), implantation rate (16.1% vs. 0%), and pregnancy rate (33.9% vs. 0%) in the GH cotreatment group differed significantly from those in the control group; the rate of good-quality embryos in the GH cotreatment group improved from 35.5% ± 31.1%-41.4% ± 30.6% in this arm. Similar results were observed in the third arm; in this arm, the clinical pregnancy rate was 30.3% in the GH cotreatment group and 6.1% in the control group. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in infertile women of advanced age, which may be due to the low GH dose. The GH adjuvant therapy for patients with one or more previous IVF treatment failures and for poor responders significantly improved the oocyte and embryo numbers as well as implantation and pregnancy rates.