Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Annu Rev Nutr ; 34: 421-47, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24850389

RESUMO

Launching a new food/dietary supplement into the US market can be a confusing process to those unfamiliar with the food industry. Industry capability and product specifications are initial determinants of whether a candidate product can be manufactured in a reproducible manner and whether pilot production can be brought up to the market scale. Regulatory issues determine how a product can be produced and marketed; the primary federal institutions involved in regulations are the US Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Federal Trade Commission. A primary distinction is made between food and drugs, and no product may enter the food market if it is in part or whole a drug. Product safety is a major concern, and myriad regulations govern the determination of safety. New foods/dietary supplements are often marketed by health claims or structure/function claims, and there are specific regulations pertaining to claims. Not understanding the regulatory issues involved in developing a new product or failing to comply with associated regulations can have legal and financial repercussions.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Rotulagem de Alimentos , Inocuidade dos Alimentos , Alimentos Especializados/efeitos adversos , Animais , Suplementos Nutricionais/economia , Suplementos Nutricionais/normas , Aditivos Alimentares/efeitos adversos , Aditivos Alimentares/economia , Aditivos Alimentares/normas , Rotulagem de Alimentos/normas , Alimentos em Conserva/efeitos adversos , Alimentos em Conserva/economia , Alimentos em Conserva/normas , Indústria de Processamento de Alimentos/economia , Alimentos Especializados/economia , Alimentos Especializados/normas , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Valor Nutritivo , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Agriculture , United States Federal Trade Commission , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
Toxicology ; 221(1): 35-43, 2006 Apr 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16480811

RESUMO

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's regulatory authority over health claims was clarified in 1990 legislation known as the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA). This law established mandatory nutrition labeling for most foods and placed restrictions on the use of food label claims characterizing the levels or health benefits of nutrients in foods. NLEA set a high threshold for the scientific standard under which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may authorize health claims, this standard is known as the significant scientific agreement (SSA) standard. Subsequent legislation known as the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) provided an alternative to FDA review of the health claim where an U.S. government scientific body other than FDA concluded that there is SSA for a substance/disease relationship. Courts have since extended the scope of health claims to include qualified health claims (QHC) that are health claims not substantiated on evidence that meets the level of SSA standard, but include a qualifying statement intended to convey to the consumer the level of evidence for the claim. FDA has responded by developing an evidence-based ranking system for scientific data to determine the level of evidence substantiating a health claim. The following is an overview of FDA's regulations and evidence-based method for evaluating health claims.


Assuntos
Rotulagem de Alimentos , Legislação sobre Alimentos , Valor Nutritivo , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...