Comparing Risk Assessment Between Payers and Providers: Inconsistent Agreement in Medical Comorbidity Records for Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The proper risk adjustment for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relies on an accurate assessment of comorbidity profiles by both the payer and the institution. The purpose of this study was to determine how strongly comorbidities tracked by our institution agreed with the same comorbidities reported by payers in patients undergoing THA and TKA. METHODS: All patients of a single payer undergoing primary THA and TKA at a single institution between January 5, 2021 and March 31, 2022 were included (n = 876). There were 8 commonly collected medical comorbidities obtained from institutional medical records and matched with patient records reported by the payer. Fleiss Kappa tests were used to determine agreement of payer data with institutional records. There were 4 medical risk calculations collected from our institutional records and compared with an insurance member risk score reported by the payer. RESULTS: Comorbidities reported by the institution differed significantly from those reported by payers, with Kappa varying between 0.139 and 0.791 for THA, and 0.062 and 0.768 for TKA. Diabetes was the only condition to demonstrate strong agreement for both procedures (THA; k = 0.791, TKA; k = 0.768). The insurance member risk score demonstrates the closest association with total cost and surplus for THA regardless of insurance type and for TKA procedures paid for with private commercial insurance. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of agreement between medical comorbidities within payer and institutional records for both THA and TKA. These differences may put institutions at a disadvantage within value-based care models and when optimizing patients perioperatively.

Routine Use of Bladder Scans After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty is Not Necessary: Results of a Protocol Change.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention is a common concern after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and can cause discomfort, incontinence and, if left untreated, myogenic changes to the bladder. However, overdiagnosis of postoperative urinary retention by bladder scans may lead to unnecessary interventions and delayed discharges. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety of two bladder management protocols following TJA. METHODS: From January 3, 2022 to April 29, 2022, 519 consecutive patients operated on by thirteen surgeons underwent routine postoperative bladder scanning (standard protocol). From February 28, 2022 to April 29, 2022, a new protocol was introduced by three surgeons in 209 consecutive patients using a specific algorithm (selective protocol) so that only symptomatic patients had bladder scans. The primary outcome of interest was catheterization rate. Chi-square and Students t-tests were used for analyses. There were 37.7% of patients in the selective group who received scans. RESULTS: Times to catheterization, readmissions, emergency department visits, and straight catheterization rates (15.0 versus 14.8% P = .999) were similar. More scans in the selective group resulted in intervention (39.2 versus 15.0%, P < .001). Prevoid volumes were higher in the selective protocol (608 versus 448 mL, P < .001). Postvoid volumes were similar (233 versus 223 mL, P = .497). There was one readmission for a urinary tract infection in the standard group and no urinary-related readmissions in the selective group. CONCLUSION: The selective protocol had a higher rate of same day discharge, fewer bladder scans, and did not lead to increased rates of urinary-related complications. These findings suggest that selective bladder scanning for symptomatic patients can be safely instituted for TJA patients.