Kraft lignin as a bio-based ingredient for Dutch asphalts: An attributional LCA.

In the last decade, lignin has received much attention as a feedstock to produce bio-based products. This study investigates the potential benefits of using lignin to mitigate the environmental impact of the road construction sector. An environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of various top-layer bio-based asphalts using kraft lignin was conducted. From a cradle-to-grave perspective, lignin-based asphalts were compared with conventional asphalts. The results of the LCA revealed that the climate change impact of lignin-based asphalts could be 30-75% lower than conventional asphalts. For the other ten impact categories, trade-offs were observed. Overall, two key factors to make the environmental impact of lignin-based asphalts lower than conventional asphalts are 1) increasing the amount of bitumen-substituted and 2) using low-grade biomass fuels for process steam in the pulp mill. The substitution of weak filler with lignin was beneficial only for climate change and could lead to a worse overall environmental performance than conventional asphalts. Similarly, higher environmental impacts for lignin-based asphalts could be obtained if the pulp mill consumed natural gas to complete the energy balance to replace the part of the black liquor from which lignin is extracted. This study also includes an in-depth discussion on methodological choices such as the allocation methods for lignin, functional units, and asphalt layers considered. We believe that such a methodological discussion could be helpful to support future Product Category Rules for asphalt mixtures.

Review of life cycle assessments of lignin and derived products: Lessons learned.

In the last decade, the use of lignin as a bio-based alternative for fossil-based products has attracted significant attention, and the first LCAs of lignin and derived products have been conducted. Assessing side-stream products like lignin and potential benefits compared to their fossil counterparts presents complex methodological issues. This article provides a critical review of forty-two peer-reviewed LCAs regarding lignin and derived products. Methodological issues and their influence on the LCA results include the choice of the modeling approach and system boundaries, functional unit definition, impact categories considered, type of data used, handling multifunctionality and biogenic carbon modeling. The review focused on climate change impacts, as this is also the main impact category considered in most studies. Other impact categories in the comparison between lignin-based products and counterparts were also discussed with examples from the studies. Based on ten lessons learned, recommendations were provided for LCA practitioners to increase future consistency of environmental claims made about lignin and lignin-based products. The finding suggest that the environmental performance of lignin-based products is significantly affected by both 1) LCA methodological problems such as allocation practices and biogenic carbon modeling and 2) technical aspects such as the percentage of lignin in the composition of products and the selection of the fuel to replace lignin in internal energy uses. Beyond this, the reviewed LCAs showed that often lignin-based products offer better environmental performances than fossil-based products, especially for climate change.

Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of renewable jet fuel (RJF) is considered an important emission mitigation measure for the aviation industry. This study compares the well-to-wake (WtWa) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission performance of multiple RJF conversion pathways and explores the impact of different co-product allocation methods. The insights obtained in this study are of particular importance if RJF is included as an emission mitigation instrument in the global Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). RESULTS: Fischer-Tropsch pathways yield the highest GHG emission reduction compared to fossil jet fuel (86-104%) of the pathways in scope, followed by Hydrothermal Liquefaction (77-80%) and sugarcane- (71-75%) and corn stover-based Alcohol-to-Jet (60-75%). Feedstock cultivation, hydrogen and conversion inputs were shown to be major contributors to the overall WtWa GHG emission performance. The choice of allocation method mainly affects pathways yielding high shares of co-products or producing co-products which effectively displace carbon intensive products (e.g., electricity). CONCLUSIONS: Renewable jet fuel can contribute to significant reduction of aviation-related GHG emissions, provided the right feedstock and conversion technology are used. The GHG emission performance of RJF may be further improved by using sustainable hydrogen sources or applying carbon capture and storage. Based on the character and impact of different co-product allocation methods, we recommend using energy and economic allocation (for non-energy co-products) at a global level, as it leverages the universal character of energy allocation while adequately valuing non-energy co-products.