RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Alcohol withdrawal is a common reason for admission to acute care hospitals. Prescription of medications for alcohol-use disorder (AUD) and close outpatient follow-up are commonly recommended, but few studies report their effects on postdischarge outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of medications for AUD and follow-up appointments on readmission and abstinence. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated veterans admitted for alcohol withdrawal to medical services at 19 Veteran Health Administration hospitals between October 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019. Factors associated with all-cause 30-day readmission and 6-month abstinence were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 594 patients included in this study, 296 (50.7%) were prescribed medications for AUD at discharge and 459 (78.5%) were discharged with follow-up appointments, including 251 (42.8%) with a substance-use clinic appointment, 191 (32.9%) with a substance-use program appointment, and 73 (12.5%) discharged to a residential program. All-cause 30-day readmission occurred for 150 patients (25.5%) and 103 (17.8%) remained abstinent at 6 months. Medications for AUD and outpatient discharge appointments were not associated with readmission or abstinence. Discharge to residential treatment program was associated with reduced 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.18-0.82) and improved abstinence (AOR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.33-4.73). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission and return to heavy drinking are common for patients discharged for alcohol withdrawal. Medications for AUD were not associated with improved outcomes. The only intervention at the time of discharge that improved outcomes was discharge to residential treatment program, which was associated with decreased readmission and improved abstinence.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Few studies describe contemporary alcohol withdrawal management in hospitalized settings or review current practices considering the guidelines by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with alcohol withdrawal on medical or surgical wards in 19 Veteran Health Administration (VHA) hospitals between October 1, 2018, and September 30, 2019. Demographic and comorbidity data were obtained from the Veteran Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse. Inpatient management and hospital outcomes were obtained by chart review. Factors associated with treatment duration and complicated withdrawal were examined. RESULTS: Of the 594 patients included in this study, 51% were managed with symptom-triggered therapy alone, 26% with fixed dose plus symptom-triggered therapy, 10% with front loading regimens plus symptom-triggered therapy, and 3% with fixed dose alone. The most common medication given was lorazepam (87%) followed by chlordiazepoxide (33%), diazepam (14%), and phenobarbital (6%). Symptom-triggered therapy alone (relative risk [RR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.80) and front loading with symptom-triggered therapy (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92) were associated with reduced treatment duration. Lorazepam (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.41) and phenobarbital (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.06-1.54) were associated with increased treatment duration. Lorazepam (adjusted odds ratio, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.05-17.63) and phenobarbital (adjusted odds ratio, 6.51; 95% CI, 2.08-20.40) were also associated with complicated withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results support guidelines by the ASAM to manage patients with long-acting benzodiazepines using symptom-triggered therapy. Health care systems that are using shorter acting benzodiazepines and fixed-dose regimens should consider updating alcohol withdrawal management pathways to follow ASAM recommendations.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of Parkinson disease (PD) and Parkinson disease dementia (PDD) in community nursing homes. To estimate how many residents who meet criteria for PDD have been diagnosed with PDD and prescribed a Federal Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for PDD. SETTING: Three private Saint Louis metropolitan area nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five residents with a chart diagnosis of PD from a total of 714 residents were identified. Sixteen subjects or families did not give consent and two were excluded from the study because advanced stage of the illness impaired evaluation. Thirty-seven subjects with an established diagnosis of PD participated in the study. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: A chart review was used to identify the study sample: residents with an established diagnosis of PD. Consent was obtained from the nursing home administration, families or guardians, and the residents themselves (where applicable). Study data were obtained from review of residents' medical charts, family/caregiver interview, resident interview, resident cognitive testing (Mini-Mental State Examination, clock drawing test), and resident depression assessment (15-item Geriatric Depression Scale). Diagnosis of PDD was defined using existing literature and described below. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 15. RESULT: Of the 714 nursing home residents, 55 (7.7%) met criteria for PD. Of these, 37 participated in the study and 18 (48.6%) met criteria for PDD. None were diagnosed with PDD in the charts and 11.1% (2 of 18) were on FDA-approved treatment. CONCLUSION: In this sample of nursing home residents, the prevalence of PD was 7.7% and the overall prevalence of PDD was 3.7%. PDD remains an unrecognized entity in the nursing home setting. Close to half (48.65%) of nursing home residents with PD may have PDD at any given time and they remain undiagnosed and largely undertreated.
