Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34790837

RESUMO

A 46-year-old woman presented with facial pain and discomfort. Diagnosis of subcutaneous dirofilariasis was reached after several months from symptom onset. Dirofilariasis should be suspected, also in non-endemic areas, in patients with a migrating subcutaneous nodule. Plastic surgery is preferred, as the face is often involved.

2.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 72(11): 1763-1768, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31350217

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite a trend towards immediate breast reconstruction in recent years, delayed breast reconstruction using a tissue expander remains a common procedure. Radiotherapy after mastectomy but before reconstruction is a risk factor, although studies examining the effect of this are limited. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the impact of pre-reconstructive radiotherapy (PRT) in patients undergoing breast reconstruction using an expander/implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three consecutive patients underwent unilateral mastectomy followed by expander-based reconstruction over a 10-year period (2004-2013). Fifty patients (22%) received radiotherapy before reconstruction (PRT group), and 173 patients (78%) did not (non-PRT group). Descriptive patient data as well as data regarding the operations, hospitalisation and complications were collected. Statistical analyses such as logistic regression, Fisher exact test and multivariate analysis were performed using R-statistics. RESULTS: PRT was a significant predictor of loss of reconstruction, and when adjusted for smoking and body mass index (BMI), it showed an odds ratio (OR) of 17.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.7-70.6; p<0.01] for loss of reconstruction, with 15 (30%) in the PRT group and 7 (4%) in the non-PRT group. We found no difference in short-term reoperations or infections at either stage of reconstruction. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing delayed breast reconstruction using an expander/implant, radiotherapy is a significant risk factor for loss of reconstruction. It should be considered a relative contraindication for this reconstructive modality, and careful selection and advisement of the patient about the risks of complications and potential need for additional corrective surgery or later autologous breast reconstruction should be discussed.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Mastectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adulto , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dispositivos para Expansão de Tecidos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 70(11): 1543-1546, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28822648

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A key component of modern analgesics is the use of multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia (MOSA). In the past, our analgesic regime after autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) included either NSAID or a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor. COX-2 inhibitors are superior to NSAIDs because of the well-known side effects of NSAID treatment (bleeding/gastrointestinal ulcers). However, COX-2 inhibitors have been suggested to increase flap failure rates. We report our experience in using COX-2 inhibitors as part of our post-operative MOSA after ABR using free flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 132 unilateral secondary ABR were performed (DIEP or MS-TRAM) in the NSAID period (2007-2011) and 128 in the COX-2 inhibitor period (2006, 2012-2014). The same surgical team operated all patients. Data were collected prospectively and reviewed to compare the two periods, with special focus on reoperations due to bleeding/haematomas and flap thrombosis/failure. Comparisons between the COX-2 inhibitor and NSAID were made. RESULTS: Median age, ischaemia time, blood loss and operating time were similar in the two periods. Significantly, more patients were re-operated because of post-operative haematoma in the NSAID group (n = 13/132, 9.8%) than in the COX-2 inhibitor group (n = 4/128, 3.1%) (p = 0.02). We found no difference in flap loss rates between the NSAID (n = 2/132, 1.5%) and the COX-2 inhibitor groups (n = 3/128, 2.3%) (p = 0.63). No patients suffered from thromboembolic complications or gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal analgesia using a COX-2 inhibitor is safe in ABR with free flaps and does not increase flap failure. COX-2 inhibitors seem superior to NSAID with reduced risk of post-operative haematomas.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/uso terapêutico , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/efeitos adversos , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...