Differences in sexual behavior among HIV discordant and concordant gay men in primary relationships.

We investigated differences in unprotected anal intercourse among gay men in HIV concordant and discordant primary relationships. Individuals were recruited in 1992 from household- and bar-based samples of gay/bisexual men in Portland, Oregon, and Tucson, Arizona. Respondents were men who reported that they were in primary relationships of > or = 1 month and who reported their own and their partner's HIV status (n = 785). Comparisons were made between three groups: (a) HIV + respondents/HIV + partners; (b) HIV- respondents/HIV- partners; and (c) respondents whose partner's HIV status was different from their own (discordant), on sexual behavior, psychosocial, and demographic variables. Men in HIV concordant relationships reported significantly higher rates of unprotected anal intercourse (54% for +2 and 48% for --) than discordant couples (17%). HIV- men in concordant relationships were more likely to be monogamous (58%) and younger (22% < or = 25 years) than the other two groups. There were no significant differences among the groups regarding the kind of sexual behaviors they engaged in with nonprimary partners. The substantially lower rate of unprotected anal intercourse among men in discordant relationships compared to men in concordant relationships suggests that individuals and couples make judgments about sex and behavior based on knowledge of one's own and one's partner's HIV status.

Differences between gay men in primary relationships and single men: implications for prevention.

This study describes psychological and behavioral differences between gay men in primary relationships and single men from 1985 through 1989. In addition, differences in sexual behavior, relationship status, and relationship quality between HIV positive and HIV negative men were investigated. Data are from the San Francisco Men's Health Study and included only men who were gay identified and who participated in the longitudinal surveys in 1985, 1987 and 1989 (N = 452). Participants were stratified by relationship status and by HIV status. HIV positive men were less likely than HIV negative men to be in primary relationships (38.9% vs. 52.9%, respectively in 1989). In addition, men in relationships had higher rates of unprotected anal intercourse than single men (32.6% vs. 17.0%, respectively in 1989). Differences in psychosocial and behavioral variables were found and have considerable implications for prevention programs and mental health services trying to meet the needs of the gay men's community.

The impact of HIV antibody status on gay men's partner preferences: a community perspective.

As more gay men are tested for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), serostatus may influence the formation of primary partner bonds in this community. We compared seropositive (n = 157), seronegative men (n = 205), and those who had not been tested (n = 158) from our ongoing AIDS Behavioral Research Project (total response in 1988 = 540). Subjects responded to mailed surveys regarding sexual behavior, relationship status, HIV antibody testing and serostatus preference when forming relationships for romance and friendship. Sixty-eight percent of seropositive gay male respondents reported no serostatus preference in partners for romance, while 83% of seronegative respondents and 74% of untested respondents preferred seronegative partners for romance. In addition, 15% of seronegative respondents and 12% of untested respondents preferred seronegative individuals for friendship. Seropositive individuals were much less likely to be desired for romance or friendship by seronegatives and those who have not been tested--at a time when emotional support and companionship are obviously needed.

Tailoring AIDS prevention: differences in behavioral strategies among heterosexual and gay bar patrons in San Francisco.

Three groups of San Francisco bar patrons (heterosexual men, heterosexual women, and gay men) were compared on four sexual risk reduction strategies for AIDS: safer sex practices (particularly adoption of the use of condoms), reducing the number of sexual partners, taking the HIV antibody test, and determining the characteristics of a potential sexual partner. Heterosexuals reported fewer sex partners and were more likely than gay men to interview potential partners. Gay men were more likely to use condoms and the HIV antibody test than their heterosexual counterparts. These findings encourage the design of interventions that take advantage of shaping and reinforcing strategies already in use in each group, and suggest when it is necessary to teach new strategies.