Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Physiol Meas ; 25(6): 1339-54, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15712714

RESUMO

The segmental method for estimating the centre of mass (COM) location of the human body has been widely used since 1889. How closely this method agrees with direct measurements of the location and movement of COM during activity however, remains unclear. To test this, a novel reaction-board utilizing life sized projections of human subjects is designed for measuring COM location. Agreement between the segmental method and the more direct reaction-board measurement method is then assessed. Our data demonstrate that the reaction-board system has a physical maximum error of 1.28 cm and 1.95 cm for locating COM along the vertical (board length) and horizontal (board width) axes respectively, and show that the reaction-board and segmental methods agree to within limits of 6.0 cm for the location of COM and to within 5.6 cm for the movement of COM between two points, in recumbent individuals. Applied to running, the segmental method agrees to within limits of 4.8 cm for oscillation of COM and 5.3 cm for stride median COM height. The segmental method agrees with a more direct technique of known accuracy, the reaction-board method, most closely when measuring averaged oscillation over repeated strides, where it displays a measurement error range of 5.1 cm to 0.1 cm in runners.


Assuntos
Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Modelos Biológicos , Exame Físico/instrumentação , Corrida/fisiologia , Transdutores , Aceleração , Adulto , Algoritmos , Simulação por Computador , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Humanos , Masculino , Exame Físico/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estresse Mecânico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...