CCR8-targeted specific depletion of clonally expanded Treg cells in tumor tissues evokes potent tumor immunity with long-lasting memory.

Foxp3-expressing CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) are abundant in tumor tissues. Here, hypothesizing that tumor Tregs would clonally expand after they are activated by tumor-associated antigens to suppress antitumor immune responses, we performed single-cell analysis on tumor Tregs to characterize them by T cell receptor clonotype and gene-expression profiles. We found that multiclonal Tregs present in tumor tissues predominantly expressed the chemokine receptor CCR8. In mice and humans, CCR8+ Tregs constituted 30 to 80% of tumor Tregs in various cancers and less than 10% of Tregs in other tissues, whereas most tumor-infiltrating conventional T cells (Tconvs) were CCR8- CCR8+ tumor Tregs were highly differentiated and functionally stable. Administration of cell-depleting anti-CCR8 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) indeed selectively eliminated multiclonal tumor Tregs, leading to cure of established tumors in mice. The treatment resulted in the expansion of CD8+ effector Tconvs, including tumor antigen-specific ones, that were more activated and less exhausted than those induced by PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade. Anti-CCR8 mAb treatment also evoked strong secondary immune responses against the same tumor cell line inoculated several months after tumor eradication, indicating that elimination of tumor-reactive multiclonal Tregs was sufficient to induce memory-type tumor-specific effector Tconvs. Despite induction of such potent tumor immunity, anti-CCR8 mAb treatment elicited minimal autoimmunity in mice, contrasting with systemic Treg depletion, which eradicated tumors but induced severe autoimmune disease. Thus, specific removal of clonally expanding Tregs in tumor tissues for a limited period by cell-depleting anti-CCR8 mAb treatment can generate potent tumor immunity with long-lasting memory and without deleterious autoimmunity.

Preclinical antitumor activity of S-222611, an oral reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are validated molecular targets in cancer therapy. Dual blockade has been explored and one such agent, lapatinib, is in clinical practice but with modest activity. Through chemical screening, we discovered a novel EGFR and HER2 inhibitor, S-222611, that selectively inhibited both kinases with IC50 s below 10 nmol/L. S-222611 also inhibited intracellular kinase activity and the growth of EGFR-expressing and HER2-expressing cancer cells. In addition, S-222611 showed potent antitumor activity over lapatinib in a variety of xenograft models. In evaluations with two patient-oriented models, the intrafemoral implantation model and the intracranial implantation model, S-222611 exhibited excellent activity and could be effective against bone and brain metastasis. Compared to neratinib and afatinib, irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitors, S-222611 showed equivalent or slightly weaker antitumor activity but a safer profile. These results indicated that S-222611 is a potent EGFR and HER2 inhibitor with substantially better antitumor activity than lapatinib at clinically relevant doses. Considering the safer profile than for irreversible inhibitors, S-222611 could be an important option in future cancer therapy.

Endogenous angiogenesis inhibitor vasohibin1 exhibits broad-spectrum antilymphangiogenic activity and suppresses lymph node metastasis.

During cancer progression, the angiogenesis that occurs is involved in tumor growth and hematogenous-distant metastasis, whereas lymphangiogenesis is involved in regional lymph node metastasis. Angiogenesis is counterregulated by various endogenous inhibitors; however, little is known about endogenous inhibitors of lymphangiogenesis. We recently isolated vasohibin1 as an angiogenesis inhibitor intrinsic to the endothelium and further demonstrated its anticancer activity through angiogenesis inhibition. Here, we examined the effect of vasohibin1 on lymphangiogenesis. Vasohibin1 exhibited broad-spectrum antilymphangiogenic activity in the mouse cornea induced by factors including VEGF-A, VEGF-C, FGF2, and PDGF-BB. We then inoculated highly lymph node-metastatic cancer cells into mice and examined the effect of vasohibin1 on lymph node metastasis. Tail-vein injection of adenovirus containing the human vasohibin1 gene inhibited tumor lymphangiogenesis and regional lymph node metastasis. Moreover, local injection of recombinant vasohibin1 inhibited lymph node metastasis. These results suggest vasohibin1 to be the first known intrinsic factor having broad-spectrum antilymphangiogenic activity and indicate that it suppresses lymph node metastasis.

Combination therapy of interleukin-2 and sorafenib improves survival benefits and prevents spontaneous pulmonary metastasis in murine renal cell carcinoma models.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the benefits of combination therapy consisting of recombinant human interleukin-2 and sorafenib for survival efficacy and the suppression of metastasis in murine renal cell carcinoma models. METHODS: Lung-metastasized renal cell carcinoma mice were treated with various combinations of recombinant human interleukin-2 and sorafenib. Tumor growth was observed using a bioluminescence imaging system. Next, the nephrectomized renal cell carcinoma mice were administered various combinations of recombinant human interleukin-2 and sorafenib, followed by a lung resection in order to examine lung metastasis by bioluminescence imaging. RESULTS: The increased life-span ratio in mice receiving combination therapy was 1.45, whereas that in mice treated with sorafenib or recombinant human interleukin-2 alone therapy was 1.28 and 1.07, respectively. The concomitant administration of recombinant human interleukin-2 and sorafenib had a metastasis-inhibitory effect, whereas the other treatments failed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that combination therapy of recombinant human interleukin-2 and sorafenib may offer better outcomes than either monotherapy with recombinant human interleukin-2 or sorafenib with respect to survival benefits and the prevention of pulmonary metastasis in renal cell carcinoma patients.

Antitumor efficacy of recombinant human interleukin-2 combined with sorafenib against mouse renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human interleukin-2 (rhIL-2) has been clinically used in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sorafenib, a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor, has been approved for RCC as well as IL-2. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of IL-2 combined with sorafenib in three different murine renal cancer models using Renca cells. METHODS: We established the subcutaneous tumor model by inoculating wild-type Renca cells into the backs of BALB/c mice, the pulmonary metastatic tumor model by an intravenous injection of luciferase-expressing Renca cells into the tail vain and the orthotopic tumor model by injecting luciferase-expressing Renca cells into the renal subcapsule. These tumor-bearing mice were treated intra-peritoneally with rhIL-2 and/or per os with sorafenib. The antitumor efficacy was evaluated by measuring the tumor size of the subcutaneous tumor or photon intensity of the pulmonary metastatic tumor and the orthotopic tumor. RESULTS: When rhIL-2 was combined with sorafenib, the antitumor efficacy was significantly augmented in comparison with either rhIL-2 or sorafenib alone in all the models. Sorafenib did not inhibit rhIL-2-induced natural killer cell expansion and rhIL-2 had no effect on the anti-angiogenic activity of sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the combination of rhIL-2 and sorafenib may offer significant potential as a novel therapeutic approach for patients with RCC.

Vasohibin as an endothelium-derived negative feedback regulator of angiogenesis.

Negative feedback is a crucial physiological regulatory mechanism, but no such regulator of angiogenesis has been established. Here we report a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that is induced in endothelial cells (ECs) by angiogenic factors and inhibits angiogenesis in an autocrine manner. We have performed cDNA microarray analysis to survey VEGF-inducible genes in human ECs. We characterized one such gene, KIAA1036, whose function had been uncharacterized. The recombinant protein inhibited migration, proliferation, and network formation by ECs as well as angiogenesis in vivo. This inhibitory effect was selective to ECs, as the protein did not affect the migration of smooth muscle cells or fibroblasts. Specific elimination of the expression of KIAA1036 in ECs restored their responsiveness to a higher concentration of VEGF. The expression of KIAA1036 was selective to ECs, and hypoxia or TNF-alpha abrogated its inducible expression. As this molecule is preferentially expressed in ECs, we designated it "vasohibin." Transfection of Lewis lung carcinoma cells with the vasohibin gene did not affect the proliferation of cancer cells in vitro, but did inhibit tumor growth and tumor angiogenesis in vivo. We propose vasohibin to be an endothelium-derived negative feedback regulator of angiogenesis.

Augmented anti-metastatic efficacy of a selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, MMI-166, in combination with CPT-11.

The anti-metastatic efficacy of MMI-166, which is a selective matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor, in combination with CPT-11 was examined using two metastasis models of human gastrointestinal cancer cells. In the liver metastasis model, C-IH human colon cancer cells were injected into the spleen of athymic BALB/c nude mice. Daily oral (p.o.) dosing of MMI-166 at 200 mg/kg starting 1 day after tumor inoculation led to a significantly prolonged survival effect by inhibiting liver metastasis of C-1H tumor cells. CPT-11 (5 or 20 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) three times on day 3, day 7 and day 11 and also improved the survival of tumor-inoculated mice compared with the vehicle control. When MMI-166 was combined with CPT-11, the anti-metastatic efficacy was significantly augmented. Moreover, long tumor-free survival was noted in two of eight mice that were given the combination therapy but not either MMI-166 or CPT-11 monotherapy. In the peritoneal dissemination model, TMK-1 human gastric cancer cells were injected i.p. into nude mice. While both MMI-166, administered daily p.o. from day 1 at 200 mg/kg, and CPT-11, administered intravenously (i.v.) three times, inhibited the tumor dissemination and growth, the combination therapy of MMI-166 plus CPT-11 showed a greater inhibitory effect than each monotherapy. A hematotoxicity study demonstrated that CPT-11 alone significantly decreased the number of white blood cells (WBC) and bone marrow cells (BMC) in the mice during treatment, while the daily administration of MMI-166 alone had no such effect. More importantly, the combination therapy of MMI-166 with CPT-11 did not augment the hematotoxicity caused by CPT-11. An in vitro cytotoxicity study showed that MMI-166 itself neither has direct cytotoxicity in C-1H and TMK-1 tumor cells, nor does it augment the cytotoxicity of SN-38, an active form of CPT-11. The findings indicate that the augmented anti-metastatic efficacy in combination treatment was not simply due to the augmentation of direct cytotoxic activity, but was rather an additive or synergistic effect of anti-metastatic activities with different mechanisms. In conclusion, we demonstrated that the anti-metastatic efficacy against C-1H colon cancer and TMK-1 gastric cancer were augmented by the combination therapy of MMI-166, an orally active MMP inhibitor, with CPT-11. However, the hematotoxicity caused by CPT-11 was not augmented in the combination with MMI-166. Thus, the combination therapy of MMI-166 and CPT-11 exhibited potent anti-metastatic efficacy without increased hematotoxicity. These results point to the clinical advantage of using MMI-166 in combination with CPT-11.

Preclinical combination chemotherapy of nedaplatin with gemcitabine against gemcitabine-refractory human lung cancer.

The antitumor efficacy of the combination of nedaplatin (NDP) with gemcitabine (GEM) was evaluated against Ma44/GEM, a GEM-refractory subline of Ma44 human lung cancer, which was established by serial in vitro passage of Ma44 cells in the presence of GEM.Ma44/GEM showed less sensitivity to GEM and cytosine arabinoside with resistance factors of 7.7 and 8.3, respectively, but not to Taxol, Irinotecan, Mitomycin C and NDP. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that membrane transporter molecules such as multidrug-resistant, multidrug-resistant related protein or lung resistant protein were not induced in Ma44/GEM cells. In vivo experiments confirmed the less sensitivity of Ma44/GEM to GEM. The resistant factor of Ma44/GEM to GEM in vivo was estimated to be 6.7 in terms of ED(50).MA44/GEM-implanted athymic mice were treated with GEM i.v. once followed by i.v. injection of NDP at an interval of approximately 30 min. The mice were treated again with GEM after 3 or 4 days. The combined dosing of NDP with GEM resulted in synergistically enhanced inhibition of tumor growth against Ma44/GEM. The antitumor efficacy of the combination of NDP and GEM was superior to the best effect of either monotherapy. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the combination of NDP with GEM against the GEM-refractory human lung cancer model.

Augmented growth inhibition of B16-BL6 melanoma by combined treatment with a selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, MMI-166, and cytotoxic agents.

BACKGROUND: MMI-166 is a selective matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the combined treatment of MMI-166 with paclitaxel or carboplatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice bearing B16-BL6 melanoma were treated p.o. with MMI-166 from 1 day after tumor inoculation. The mice were administered i.v. with either paclitaxel or carboplatin at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). RESULTS: MMI-166 monotherapy inhibited in vivo growth of the B16-BL6 tumor to an extent similar to that of paclitaxel or carboplatin monotherapy. When MMI-166 was combined with paclitaxel or carboplatin, the antitumor efficacy was significantly (p < 0.01) augmented in comparison with either MMI-166 or each cytotoxic agent alone. The hematotoxicity study demonstrated that daily treatment with MMI-166 did not affect the blood cell number in the mice and more importantly the combination of MMI-166 with paclitaxel did not augment the hematotoxicity caused by paclitaxel. An in vitro cytotoxicity study showed that MMI-166 itself has neither direct cytotoxicity against B16-BL6 tumor cells nor does it augment the cytotoxicity of paclitaxel or carboplatin. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that augmented antitumor activity of the combination treatment was not simply due to the augmentation of direct cytotoxic activity, but was rather an additive effect of the antitumor activities of different mechanisms. They suggest the effectiveness of a combination therapy of MMI-166 with paclitaxel or carboplatin in clinical therapy.