Long-term evaluation of E6011, an anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of E6011, a humanized anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. METHODS: In the double-blind treatment phase (24 weeks), placebo or E6011 400 mg was administered until Week 10. Thereafter, E6011 200 mg or 400 mg was administered to Week 22. Subjects who completed the evaluation at Week 24 of the treatment phase were rolled over into the extension phase. The extension phase lasted until Week 104, and all subjects received E6011 400 mg or 200 mg every 2 weeks in an open-label manner until Week 102. RESULTS: A total of 47 subjects completed the double-blind treatment phase and were rolled over into the extension phase. In total, 46 (97.9%) subjects experienced any adverse events, and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 57.4%. No clear efficacy trend in the American College of Rheumatology 20% response rates was observed. CONCLUSIONS: E6011 was well tolerated in active rheumatoid arthritis patients who had shown an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, but no clear benefit in the American College of Rheumatology 20% response rates was observed. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical benefit of E6011.

Long-term safety and efficacy of E6011, an anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of E6011, a humanized anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Active RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX were randomly assigned to the E6011 or placebo group and received the study drug subcutaneously every 2 weeks during a 24-week double-blind study period. Subjects who completed evaluations at Week 24 were rolled over into the extension phase and received open-label E6011 (200 or 400 mg) every 2 weeks until Week 102. The safety analysis was conducted up to Week 104, and the efficacy analysis was conducted up to Week 84. RESULTS: A total of 169 subjects completed the double-blind treatment phase and were rolled over into the extension phase. In total, 167 (98.8%) subjects experienced any adverse events, and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 56.2%. The American College of Rheumatology 20 response rates were observed between 40 and 70% during the extension phase. CONCLUSIONS: E6011 was safe and well tolerated with no notable safety concerns up to 102 weeks in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX.

First-in-Human Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of E6742, a Dual Antagonist of Toll-like Receptors 7 and 8, in Healthy Volunteers.

The first-in-human phase I study for E6742, a dual toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 and TLR8 antagonist, has been conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of E6742 in healthy volunteers. In a single ascending dose (SAD) study, 42 subjects received 10-800 mg of E6742 in the fasted state, as well as a 100-mg cohort in the fed state for evaluating the effect of food. In a multiple ascending dose (MAD) study, 18 subjects received 100-400 mg of E6742 twice daily for 7 days. E6742 was rapidly absorbed with a median tmax ranging from 1.50 to 2.50 hours across dose groups under the fasted condition, and eliminated with a median t½ ranging from 2.37 to 14.4 hours. After multiple oral doses, a steady state was reached by day 7. In the SAD study, dose proportionality was observed for Cmax , AUC(0-t) , and AUC(0-inf) values of E6742 up to 800 mg, but these values were slightly less than dose proportional at 10 mg. In the MAD study, the Cmax and AUC(0-12h)ss of E6742 appeared to be almost dose proportionally increased between 100 and 200 mg, while these parameters showed more than a dose proportional increase at 400 mg. In addition to safety and good tolerability, this study demonstrated cytokine concentrations in cultured peripheral blood in response to E6742 were suppressed in a dose-dependent manner. Further clinical studies targeting systemic lupus erythematosus patients are currently underway.

Phase II study of tazemetostat for relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with EZH2 mutation in Japan.

Tazemetostat is a selective, reversible, small-molecule inhibitor of the histone methyltransferase enzyme, enhancer of zest homolog 2 (EZH2). In this multicenter, open-label, phase II study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of tazemetostat in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma harboring the EZH2 mutation. Tazemetostat (800 mg twice daily) was given orally (28-day cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Among the 20 eligible patients, 17 were enrolled in cohort 1 (follicular lymphoma [FL]), and three were enrolled in cohort 2 (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). At data cut-off, the objective response rate in cohort 1 was 76.5%, including six patients (35.3%) with complete response and seven patients (41.2%) with partial response (PR). All three patients in cohort 2 achieved PR. In cohort 1, median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached at the median follow-up of 12.9 months. The estimated PFS rate at 12 and 15 months was 94.1% and 73.2%, respectively. The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was lymphopenia (n = 2). Grade 4 TEAEs included hypertriglyceridemia and pneumonia aspiration (n = 1 each), which were not related to tazemetostat. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation were reported in four of the 20 patients, indicating that the safety profile of tazemetostat was acceptable and manageable. Tazemetostat 800 mg twice daily showed encouraging efficacy in patients with R/R EZH2 mutation-positive FL with a manageable safety profile in the overall population. Thus, tazemetostat could be a potential treatment for R/R EZH2 mutation-positive FL.

Phase 1 study on the safety and efficacy of E6011, antifractalkine antibody, in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: E6011 is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting fractalkine (FKN), a CX3C chemokine, which regulates leukocyte trafficking during inflammation. We evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of E6011 in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and also performed preliminary pharmacodynamic (PD) and efficacy assessments. METHODS: This study included a 12-week multiple ascending dose (MAD) phase (2, 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks, n = 6, 8, 7, and 7, respectively) and a 40-week Extension phase (n = 12) at the same dose as the MAD phase. Serum E6011, serum total FKN (free soluble FKN and E6011-FKN complex) as a PD marker and CD activity index were evaluated. The primary outcome was safety assessment in the MAD phase. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (96%) of 28 patients had previously been treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents. During the MAD phase, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 18 (64%). The most common AE was nasopharyngitis (five patients, 18%). No severe AEs occurred. Serious AEs occurred in three patients, progression of CD in two, and anemia in one. Serum E6011 concentrations increased dose-dependently after infusion and reached a plateau around 4-6 weeks. Serum total FKN rose simultaneously. Five (18%) patients developed anti-E6011 antibodies during the study. Overall, clinical response and clinical remission were observed at Week 12 in 40% (10/25) and 16% (4/25) of active CD patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: E6011 was well-tolerated and might be effective in CD patients. These findings need to be clarified in a randomized controlled study.

A phase 2 study of E6011, an anti-Fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of E6011, a novel humanized anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: Active RA patients inadequately responding to biological DMARDs were randomly assigned to placebo or E6011 400-mg group at a 1:1 ratio, and administered E6011 at weeks 0, 1, 2, and subsequently every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response at week 12. RESULTS: Of 64, 33 received placebo, 31 received E6011 400-mg. The ACR20 response rate at week 12 (non-responder imputation) was 27.3% and 22.6% in the placebo and E6011 groups, respectively. ACR50, ACR70 response rates at week 12 were 3.0%, 0% in the placebo and 9.7%, 3.2% in the E6011 group. Exploratory PK exposure analysis revealed that the effect of E6011 tended to be clearer in patients with higher serum trough E6011 concentration. E6011 was well tolerated with no notable safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: E6011 400-mg was well tolerated but had no clear efficacy at week 12 in RA patients with inadequate response to biologics. Further investigations are warranted to determine the optimal clinical dose and evaluation period for E6011.

Efficacy and Safety of E6011, an Anti-Fractalkine Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of E6011, a humanized IgG2 monoclonal antibody against human fractalkine (FKN), in a phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe RA who had an inadequate response to methotrexate were randomly assigned to a placebo group or to E6011 100-mg, 200-mg, or 400/200-mg groups at a 2:1:2:2 ratio. During the 24-week period, patients received the study drug subcutaneously at weeks 0, 1, and 2 and then once every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at week 12. RESULTS: Study drugs were administered to 190 patients (placebo, n = 54; E6011 100 mg, n = 28; E6011 200 mg, n = 54; E6011 400/200 mg, n = 54), and 169 patients completed treatment. A significant difference from placebo was not found in ACR20 response rates at week 12 (37.0% [placebo], 39.3% [100 mg], 48.1% [200 mg], and 46.3% [400/200 mg], using nonresponder imputation). As a secondary end point, ACR20 response rate in the 200-mg and 400/200-mg groups attained statistical significance at week 24 (35.2% [placebo], 39.3% [100 mg], 53.7% [200 mg], and 57.4% [400/200 mg]). Subsequent exploratory subgroup analysis revealed greater efficacy of E6011, particularly in patients with a higher baseline proportion of CD16+ monocytes; ACR20 response rates in this patient subgroup at week 24 were 30.0% (placebo), 46.7% (100 mg), 57.7% (200 mg), and 69.6% (400/200 mg). E6011 administered for 24 weeks was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This is the first evidence that E6011, a novel cell trafficking inhibitor targeting the FKN-CX3 CR1 interaction, is modestly effective with 24 weeks of treatment in RA patients, although the primary end point was not met.

Pharmacokinetic disposition of topical phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor E6005 in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Background: A novel topical phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor E6005 shows potential as effective treatment option for atopic dermatitis (AD); however, systemic exposure may cause potentially undesirable adverse reactions. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the systemic exposure of E6005 and clinical parameters including skin condition and the incidence of AEs in patients with AD. Methods: The association analysis used the clinical data obtained in a previously conducted clinical study with topical E6005 in adult patients with AD. To estimate associations with drug exposure, generalized estimating equation logistic regression models were used, along with clinical data and plasma concentrations of M11, the major metabolite of E6005 (as an indicator for E6005 exposure). Results: The metabolite M11 was detected in 62 of 221 plasma samples from 72 subjects. From association analysis, SCORAD-A obtained prior to E6005 treatment was identified as the clinical parameter influenced to M11 detection with statistical significance (p = .003). M11 detection was not clearly associated with the incidence of adverse events occurred. Conclusion: Exposure to topical E6005 is associated with the eczema-associated area, however, that is not distinctly associated with its adverse drug reactions occurred after drug applications possibly due to E6005's characteristics of tissue distribution.

Efficacy and safety of twice-daily rabeprazole maintenance therapy for patients with reflux esophagitis refractory to standard once-daily proton pump inhibitor: the Japan-based EXTEND study.

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole at 10 or 20 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) has been reported to be highly effective in the treatment of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-resistant reflux esophagitis (RE) that is refractory to the standard once-daily PPI regimen. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole maintenance therapy at 10 mg once daily (q.d.) or b.i.d. for longer than 8 weeks. METHODS: Patients with RE refractory to standard PPI regimens for at least 8 weeks were enrolled. They were treated with rabeprazole at 10 or 20 mg b.i.d. for 8 weeks during the open-label treatment period. After endoscopic examination, those with confirmed healing entered the subsequent double-blind maintenance therapy. During this period, the subjects were randomized to receive rabeprazole 10 mg q.d. (control) or 10 mg b.i.d. The primary endpoint was the endoscopic no-recurrence rate at Week 52. RESULTS: In total, 517 subjects entered the treatment, and 359 subjects continued on maintenance therapy. The full analysis set for central assessment included 343 subjects. The no-recurrence rate at Week 52 was significantly higher in the b.i.d. group (73.9%; p < 0.001, χ2 test) than in the q.d. group (44.8%). In particular, the b.i.d. regimen was more effective in all subgroups with Los Angeles Classification Grade B to D at treatment entry. CONCLUSIONS: In the maintenance treatment of PPI-resistant RE, rabeprazole at 10 mg b.i.d. exerted a stronger recurrence-preventing effect than 10 mg q.d. over 52 weeks. No particular safety issues were noted during long-term administration. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02135107.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of E6011, an antifractalkine monoclonal antibody, in a first-in-patient phase 1/2 study on rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Fractalkine (CX3CL1/FKN) is a chemokine that regulates chemotaxis and adhesion of CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1)-expressing inflammatory cells. We conducted the first phase 1/2, open-label, multiple ascending dose study of E6011, a humanized anti-FKN monoclonal antibody, in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT02196558). METHODS: Active RA patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor received E6011 at week 0, 1, 2, and thereafter every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Twelve, 15, and 10 subjects were enrolled in the 100, 200, and 400 mg cohorts, respectively. No severe adverse events (AEs) or deaths occurred, and no major differences were observed in the incidence or severity of AEs across the cohorts. Serum E6011 concentrations increased dose dependently. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50, and 70 responses at week 12 were 75.0%, 33.3%, and 8.3% in the 100 mg cohort; 66.7%, 20.0%, and 13.3% in the 200 mg cohort; and 60.0%, 30.0%, and 20.0% in the 400 mg cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: E6011 appeared to be safe and well tolerated in RA patients during this 12-week treatment period, suggesting that E6011 has an effective clinical response in active RA patients.

Dose Finding of Lenvatinib in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analyses.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for up to 90% of primary liver cancer occurrences worldwide. Lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor, was approved in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. In this phase 2 study (study 202), we aimed to identify the lenvatinib optimal dose for subjects with advanced HCC Child-Pugh class A. Pooled data from phase 1 studies in healthy adults and in subjects with mixed tumor types, and from study 202 in subjects with HCC, were analyzed using a population pharmacokinetic approach. The relationship between treatment-emergent adverse events leading to withdrawal or dose reduction during cycle 1 and lenvatinib exposure was explored by logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to investigate the best cutoff values of lenvatinib exposure and body weight to identify a high-risk group for early dose modification. The final pharmacokinetic model included body-weight effects on apparent clearance and volume. The relationship between the lenvatinib area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) at steady state and body weight demonstrated an increase in AUC as body weight decreased in subjects with HCC. An exposure-response relationship was observed, with higher lenvatinib AUC and lower body weight resulting in earlier drug withdrawal or dose reduction. The best cutoff values for body weight and lenvatinib AUC were 57.8 kg and 2430 ng·h/mL, respectively, to predict the group at high risk for early drug withdrawal or dose reduction. We therefore recommend 12-mg and 8-mg starting doses for subjects ≥60 kg and <60 kg, respectively, in subjects with HCC Child-Pugh class A.

Efficacy of a novel phosphodiesterase inhibitor, E6005, in patients with atopic dermatitis: An investigator-blinded, vehicle-controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE4) inhibition is a well-known anti-inflammatory mechanism. However, the clinical use of PDE4 inhibitors has been compromised by the occurrence of mechanism-associated adverse reactions, which often limit the maximum tolerated dose. To minimize systemic exposure, a topically active PDE4 inhibitor with low transdermal bioavailability could be clinically useful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel topical PDE4 inhibitor, E6005, in patients with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: This randomized, investigator-blinded, vehicle-controlled, multiple ascending dose study included 40 adult male patients with atopic dermatitis, who were randomly assigned to 10 days of treatment with either E6005 ointment (0.01, 0.03, 0.1 or 0.2%) or vehicle ointment. RESULTS: Of 81 patients screened, 40 who had typical lesions on their posterior trunk were randomized into the study. One patient receiving 0.03% E6005 treatment discontinued because of acute gout and one receiving vehicle treatment discontinued because of progression of atopic dermatitis. The targeted lesion severity scores decreased in a concentration-dependent manner in patients treated with E6005. This drop was significant in the 0.2% E6005 ointment treatment group (mean percent change: -54.30%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: E6005 ointment showed anti-inflammatory efficacy in adult patients with atopic dermatitis.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a novel phosphodiesterase inhibitor, E6005 ointment, in healthy volunteers and in patients with atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present studies was to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of topical application of a novel phosphodiesterase inhibitor, E6005, in healthy volunteers and in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: In two randomized, investigator-blind, vehicle-controlled studies, we evaluated the topical application of E6005 ointment at concentrations ranging from 0.01% to 0.2% in healthy volunteers (Study 001) and in patients with AD (Study 101). RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects were enrolled in Study 001 and 40 in Study 101. Neither skin irritation nor photosensitization was observed with application of E6005 in Study 001. Four subjects receiving E6005 in Study 001 experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (application site edema, increased alanine aminotransferase or erythema); three of these subjects discontinued the study. Two subjects receiving E6005 in Study 101 experienced an adverse event (gout or enterocolitis); one discontinued the study. Plasma concentrations of E6005 were below the limit of quantification (1 ng/ml) in both studies. CONCLUSION: E6005 ointment exhibited acceptable safety and tolerability. Topical application of E6005 ointment resulted in very low systemic exposure to E6005 in healthy volunteers and in patients with AD.

Effect of topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor E6005 on Japanese children with atopic dermatitis: Results from a randomized, vehicle-controlled exploratory trial.

This exploratory study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of the topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor E6005 in Japanese children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. The present randomized, multicenter study included 62 patients who were treated with 0.05% E6005, 0.2% E6005 or vehicle ointment twice daily for 2 weeks. Safety and pharmacokinetics were assessed with a focus on the occurrence of adverse events and the whole blood concentrations of E6005 and its metabolite. Exploratory efficacy evaluations included assessments of lesion severity and pruritus score. The 2-week application of topical E6005 was safe and well tolerated with no cutaneous adverse events. The whole blood concentration of E6005 was quantified in only one subject receiving 0.2% E6005 treatment, while its major metabolite was undetectable. The 0.2% E6005 group showed a greater decrease in the severity score than the vehicle group (-45.94% vs -32.26%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, the treatment success rate according to the investigator's global assessment of the total application sites was higher in the 0.2% E6005 group than in the vehicle group (34.4% vs 20.0%). Moreover, the 0.2% E6005 group showed a greater decrease in the pruritus score than the vehicle group (-37.5% vs -6.7%) in a predefined subpopulation. The efficacy of 0.05% E6005 treatment was comparable to that of vehicle treatment. These results suggest that topical 0.2% E6005 treatment is safe and effective in children with atopic dermatitis, although further large confirmatory clinical trials are warranted.

Safety and efficacy of topical E6005, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in Japanese adult patients with atopic dermatitis: results of a randomized, vehicle-controlled, multicenter clinical trial.

The safety and efficacy of topical E6005, a novel phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in Japanese adults with atopic dermatitis were evaluated. A total of 78 patients were randomized to receive either the 0.2% E6005 ointment or vehicle control (without E6005) at an allocation ratio of 2:1. The randomization phase of 4 weeks was followed by an extension phase of 8 weeks. In the extension phase, all 67 subjects who completed the randomization phase were treated with 0.2% E6005 ointment. The 4-week application of topical E6005 twice daily was safe and well tolerated. The safety profile for up to 12 weeks was similar to that for the first 4 weeks. No deaths or other serious adverse effects were observed during the entire study period of 12 weeks. Plasma E6005 was undetectable in all subjects at all sampling points while very low plasma concentrations of an E6005 metabolite were detected in 47% of subjects receiving E6005 treatment. At the end of week 4, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Severity Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD)-objective, SCORAD-C (visual analog scales for pruritus and sleep loss), itch Behavioral Rating Scale, and the severity of the targeted eczematous lesions in the topical E6005 group showed trends toward improvement compared with those in the vehicle group (not statistically significant). However, the group receiving topical E6005 for 12 weeks showed significant score reductions from baselines for EASI (P = 0.030), SCORAD-objective (P < 0.001) and SCORAD-C (P = 0.038). These results further support the development of topical E6005 for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

Dose-response relationships of rabeprazole 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg once daily on suppression of gastric acid secretion through the night in healthy Japanese individuals with different CYP2C19 genotypes.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the antisecretory activity of rabeprazole administered once daily in doses of 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg and different cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotypes on gastric pH in healthy individuals. Additional objectives were delineating the nighttime from the daytime effect and determining the relationships between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rabeprazole. METHODS: Eight individuals of each of the three genotypes of CYP2C19-homozygous extensive metabolizers (homo-EMs), heterozygous EMs (hetero-EMs), and poor metabolizers (PMs)-were recruited. Twenty-four individuals received a once-daily dose, with dosing interval 24 h of 5, 10, 20, or 40 mg rabeprazole for 5 days in a 4-period crossover fashion. Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH and plasma rabeprazole concentrations were determined on day 5. RESULTS: A dose-dependent increase in median pH and in pH 4 holding time was observed across all CYP2C19 genotypes. When rabeprazole was increased from 20 mg to 40 mg, the differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of nighttime pH 4 holding time between 40 mg and 20 mg in homo-EMs, hetero-EMs, and PMs were 8.0% (-5.0% -21.0%), 28.7% (15.7% -41.6%), and 16.9% (3.9% -29.9%), respectively. The relationship between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last time point at which rabeprazole was quantifiable (AUC(0-t)) and the pH 4 holding time could be described using a sigmoid maximum effect (E(max)) model. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that increasing rabeprazole dose up to 40 mg once daily results in an increasing pharmacodynamic effect, which is most apparent for the control of nocturnal gastric acid secretion.