A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers.

The Postdoc Academy: Succeeding as a Postdoc was designed to build postdocs' skills in career transition, career planning, collaborative research, resilience, and self-reflection. This study examined self-reported changes in five skills as learners progressed through the course. Data were collected from participants who responded to both pre- and post-surveys and engaged with the course learning activities. Results from repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed that all of the self-reported perceptions of skills improved significantly upon completion of the course. Hierarchical regressions revealed that underrepresented minority learners had greater gains in their development of skills in career planning, resilience, and self-reflection. Qualitative analysis of learners' responses to learning activities found that postdocs perceived networking and mentor support as contributing factors to their skill advancement while tensions among multiple obligations and concerns of uncertainties were significant challenges to applying those skills.

How effective are ACF-funded couple relationship education programs? A meta-analytic study.

Since 2006, the U.S. Administration for Children and Families (ACF) has allocated $1.2 billion to a Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education (HMRE) policy initiative that provides grants to community organizations to support relationship education (RE) services for lower income couples and individuals. The policy aim was to help disadvantaged couples and individuals form and sustain healthy, stable relationships and marriages. A significant body of research on the effectiveness of these programs has now accumulated. This meta-analytic study reviews all evaluation research reports of adult couple relationship education (CRE) programs supported by the ACF policy initiative to examine their impact on an array of couple, family, and individual well-being outcomes. Overall, our review of 32 control-group studies found a range of small but significant effects for couple relationship quality (d = .114), relationship skills (d = .132), mental health (d = .074), and coparenting (d = .033), but non-significant effects for relationship stability, parenting, and child well-being. Supplemental analyses with 19 1-group/pre-post studies showed larger effects. Planned moderator analyses explored significant heterogeneity in most effects, however, revealing interesting implications for practice and research going forward.

Desde 2006, la Administración para los Niños y las Familias (Administration for Children and Families, ACF) de los Estados Unidos ha destinado $1.2 mil millones a una iniciativa de una política de Capacitación en Relaciones y Matrimonios Saludables (Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education, HMRE) que ofrece subvenciones a organizaciones comunitarias con el objetivo de financiar servicios de capacitación en relaciones para parejas y personas de bajos recursos. El objetivo de la política es ayudar a las parejas y a las personas desfavorecidas a formar y mantener relaciones y matrimonios estables y saludables. Actualmente se ha acumulado un número considerable de investigaciones sobre la eficacia de estos programas. En este estudio metaanalítico se analizan todos los informes de evaluaciones de investigaciones sobre programas de capacitación en relaciones de parejas adultas financiados por la iniciativa de políticas de la ACF con el fin de estudiar su efecto en diversos resultados de bienestar en las parejas, las familias y las personas particulares. En general, en nuestro análisis de 32 estudios de grupos de referencia se hallaron distintos efectos pequeños pero significativos para la calidad de la relación de pareja (d = .114), las habilidades relacionales (d = .132), la salud mental (d = .074), y la cocrianza (d = .033), y efectos no significativos para la estabilidad relacional, la crianza y el bienestar de los niños. Los análisis complementarios con 19 estudios previos y posteriores de un grupo demostraron efectos más importantes. Sin embargo, los análisis planificados de moderadores analizaron la heterogeneidad significativa en la mayoría de los efectos y revelaron consecuencias interesantes para la práctica y la investigación en el futuro.

Theory of change models deepen online learning evaluation.

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have gained traction as resources for professional development. This article presents the method that we used to evaluate a professional development MOOC for postdoctoral trainees that was created by a university consortium in the US. Most approaches to evaluating MOOCs focus on analysis of participation, outcomes from course assignments, self-reported learning outcomes, course completion and user pathways through the online content or clickstream data. Few published evaluations describe in detail how learning happens within online courses and the anticipated medium and longer term cognitive and behavioral outcomes on participants. This work aims to guide those who are designing, implementing and evaluating MOOCs through applying theories of change to focus evaluation on the process of learning. This approach can be used as a complement to traditional approaches for evaluating MOOCs. We described how we worked with the MOOC team building the content to develop a theory of change for each module (or lesson) within the MOOC and used the theory of change to guide evaluation of short and medium term participant cognitive, affective and attitudinal, and behavioral outcomes. Finally, we share lessons learned and suggestions for implementing theories of change in both the design and evaluation phases of MOOC development.