Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patient Adherence in Managing Renal Masses.

INTRODUCTION: Previous literature suggests socioeconomic status and racial disparities impact management decisions for patients with small renal masses. We aim to build upon these findings and examine how these modalities impact patient adherence to their management plan. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed our Kidney Tumor Program database (n = 1476) containing patients from 2000 to 2020. Socioeconomic status was estimated using 2 modalities: Area Deprivation Index and household income. Patients were then evaluated for differences in adherence, nonadherence, and loss to follow-up. Adherent patients completed all recommended appointments within 6 months of their initial follow-up. Nonadherent patients did not complete all recommended appointments within 6 months of their originally scheduled follow-up but eventually did. Patients lost to follow-up were recommended to follow up but never did. RESULTS: Patient adherence was not significantly different across sex or primary treatment method but differed with respect to race/ethnicity. Black patients were significantly more likely to be nonadherent (P = .021) and lost to follow-up (P = .008). After adjusting for race/ethnicity, Area Deprivation Index and income bracket were significantly associated with adherence and loss to follow-up. Patients with a high socioeconomic status had significantly higher rates of adherence (ADI, quartile [Q] 1 vs Q4, P = .038; income, >$120,000 vs $30,000-$59,999, P < .003) and decreased loss to follow-up (ADI, Q1 vs Q4, P = .03; income, >$120,000 vs $30,000-$59,999, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that Black race and low socioeconomic status are associated with decreased adherence and increased loss to follow-up. Possible strategies to target these disparities include financial assistance programming, social determinants of health screening, and nurse navigator programs.

Evaluation of a novel augmented reality educational tool and its effects on patient experience: A randomized controlled trial.

Introduction: Patient education is an essential element of the treatment pathway. Augmented reality (AR), with disease simulations and three-dimensional visuals, offers a developing approach to patient education. We aim to determine whether this tool can increase patient understanding of their disease and post-visit satisfaction in comparison to current standard of care (SOC) educational practices in a randomized control study. Methods: Our single-site study consisted of 100 patients with initial diagnoses of kidney masses or stones randomly enrolled in the AR or SOC arm. In the AR arm, a physician used AR software on a tablet to educate the patient. SOC patients were educated through traditional discussion, imaging, and hand-drawn illustrations. Participants completed pre- and post-physician encounter surveys adapted from the Press Ganey® patient questionnaire to assess understanding and satisfaction. Their responses were evaluated in the Readability Studio® and analyzed to quantify rates of improvement in self-reported understanding and satisfaction scores. Results: There was no significant difference in participant education level (P = 0.828) or visit length (27.6 vs. 25.0 min, P = 0.065) between cohorts. Our data indicate that the rate of change in pre- to post-visit self-reported understanding was similar in each arm (P ≥ 0.106 for all responses). The AR arm, however, had significantly higher patient satisfaction scores concerning the educational effectiveness and understanding of images used during the consultation (P < 0.05). Conclusions: While AR did not significantly increase self-reported patient understanding of their disease compared to SOC, this study suggests AR as a potential avenue to increase patient satisfaction with educational tools used during consultations.

Persistent opioid and benzodiazepine use after radical cystectomy in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) patients.

OBJECTIVES: Opioid use, misuse, and diversion is of paramount concern in the United States. Radical cystectomy is typically managed with some component of opioid pain control. We evaluated persistent opioid and benzodiazepine use after radical cystectomy and assessed the impact of their preoperative use on this outcome. We also explored associations between preoperative use and perioperative outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used prospectively maintained data from our enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) cystectomy database and the Prescription Reporting with Immediate Medication Utilization Mapping (PRIMUM) database to identify controlled substance prescriptions for radical cystectomy patients. We separated patients by frequency of preoperative opioid and/or benzodiazepine prescriptions (0, 1, 2+) and used these cohorts to explore persistent use (prescription 3-12 months after surgery) alongside perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Our cohort included 257 patients undergoing cystectomy at a single institution from 2017 to 2021. Preoperative opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions were documented for 120 (46.7%) and 26 (10.1%) patients, respectively. Persistent opioid use was observed in 20 (14.6%) of opioid-naive patients (no prescriptions in 9 months prior to surgery) while 13 (19.7%) patients with 1 preoperative prescription and 28 (51.9%) patients with 2 or more preoperative prescriptions demonstrated persistent use. New persistent benzodiazepine use occurred in 6 (2.6%) patients. Overall persistent benzodiazepine use was present in 11 (4.3%) patients. In a multivariable model, preoperative opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions were associated with persistent opioid use (P < 0.001; P = 0.027 respectively). No association was identified between preoperative opioid or benzodiazepine usage and perioperative outcomes including length of stay, return of bowel function, inpatient opioid usage, inpatient or discharge complications, readmissions, or emergency department visits. Inpatient pain scores were noted to be higher in patients with ≥ 2 preoperative opioid prescriptions (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent opioid use was present in 23.7% of patients, with a new persistent use rate of 14.6%. Benzodiazepine use was less frequent than opioids, with a small number demonstrating new persistent use. Preoperative opioid and benzodiazepine use is associated with persistent opioid use postoperatively. Preoperative opioid and benzodiazepine use did not affect perioperative outcomes in our cohort.