Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
1.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 30(3): 235-6, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27556290
2.
Crit Care Nurs Q ; 38(3): 298-311, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26039652

RESUMO

Across the world, the population is aging. Adults 65 years and older make up one of the fastest growing segments of the US population. Trauma is a disease process that affects all age groups. The mortality and morbidity that result from an injury can be influenced by many factors including age, physical condition, and comorbidities. The management of the elderly trauma patient can present some unique challenges. This paper addresses the differences that occur in the management of elderly patient who has been injured. This paper also includes a discussion of how to prevent injury in the elderly.


Assuntos
Ferimentos e Lesões , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Comorbidade , Enfermagem de Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia
4.
J Emerg Nurs ; 39(4): 322-3, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23829984
9.
J Emerg Nurs ; 38(4): 318-9, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22770394
10.
J Emerg Nurs ; 38(2): 115, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22401610
13.
J Nurs Manag ; 19(5): 623-31, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21749536

RESUMO

AIM: To assess nursing staff's background and research and quality improvement (QI) experience. BACKGROUND: In this corporation, participation in research and QI is encouraged, but little is known about nurses' experiences. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed. Nursing staffs from an academic/teaching medical centre and other intra-corporation non-academic facilities were compared. RESULTS: Respondents included: 148 (52.9%) medical centre and 132 (47.1%) non-medical centre subjects. Medical centre respondents had a higher proportion previously engaged in research, currently engaged in research and previously engaged in QI. Productivity (grant, published and presented) was low for both groups but statistically lower for the non-medical centre group. Medical centre employees used research resources more often than the non-medical centre. Time was the most frequently mentioned barrier to participation in research and QI initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: A moderate proportion of respondents had research and QI experience, yet productivity and use of resources was low. Nurses at non-academically focused facilities were in most need of assistance. Familiarizing nurses with resources and providing protected time may increase productivity. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Developing an infrastructure to support nursing research is a worthy goal. Information about interest and experience of nurses can aid management in determining how to focus financial resources.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pesquisa em Enfermagem , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/psicologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Competência Clínica , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
14.
Air Med J ; 30(4): 208-15, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21798455

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate difficult airway simulator intubation success rates using Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems (CAMTS) initial and maintenance intubation training standards on transport-RN novice intubators over a 1-year period. METHODS: Twelve transport nurses were blinded to and randomly assigned five or six of 64 different difficult airway simulator scenarios. Intubation success rates were measured 1 month before training, 1 month after training, and 1 year later, following CAMTS initial and maintenance intubation standards. Outcome measurements included first attempt intubation rate, overall intubation success rate, number of attempts to intubation, time per attempt, time to intubation, and time between attempts. During the study, participants received no additional training or opportunities to intubate. RESULTS: First-attempt intubation rates significantly improved (P 5 .022) from 19% 1 month before training to 36% 1 month after training, but did not significantly change (P > .999) 1 year later following CAMTS maintenance standards (34%). Mean cumulative success rates did not significantly improve after four attempts or after 3.5 minutes. The overall mean time per attempt and time between attempts declined with subsequent intubation attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Using initial and maintenance CAMTS standards, simulator difficult airway intubation success rates are low in novice intubators. Our results suggest that one intubation/quarter may be enough to maintain difficult airway intubation success rates. Training significantly improves intubation rates. Little advantage occurs in intubation rates after four attempts or 3.5 minutes.


Assuntos
Acreditação/normas , Competência Clínica/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Auxiliares de Emergência/normas , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/normas , Adulto , Educação em Enfermagem/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Auxiliares de Emergência/educação , Feminino , Humanos , Laringoscópios/normas , Masculino , Simulação de Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...