Multiple intrasplenic hepatocyte transplantations in the dalmatian dog.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocyte transplantation is an attractive potential treatment for liver-based inborn errors of metabolism and for fulminant hepatic failure. Dalmatian dogs have a metabolic error that results in hyperuricosuria. This report focuses on the effect of multiple, sequential intrasplenic transplants of fresh and cryopreserved hepatocytes in dalmatians. METHODS: Dalmatians underwent intrasplenic hepatocyte transplantation with hepatocytes taken from healthy mongrels. Dalmatian urinary uric acid excretion was measured preoperatively, and this served as the control value. Three hepatocyte transplantations were performed at 30-day intervals--the first with freshly isolated cells, and both the second and the third with cryopreserved hepatocytes from the same donor. Urinary uric acid excretion was measured postoperatively twice per week. RESULTS: The urinary uric acid excretion decreased an average of 54% after the first hepatocyte transplantation. The effect was transient and lasted an average of 22 days (range, 19-50 days). Subsequent intrasplenic hepatocyte transplantation with cryopreserved hepatocytes resulted in similar decreases in urinary uric acid excretion. Each transplant resulted in a significant decrease in urinary uric acid excretion when compared with baseline values (P = < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential intrasplenic hepatocyte transplantation is feasible in this model. This method provided a significant, but transient, correction in urinary uric acid excretion that was similar with either fresh or cryopreserved hepatocytes. A substantial biologic effect provided by cryopreserved hepatocytes has important implications in clinical hepatocyte transplantation.

Comparison of rejection rate and functional outcome of small bowel transplantation alone or in conjunction with the ileocecal valve versus combined small and large bowel transplantation.

Preservation of the ileocecal valve improves absorptive function and decreases the amount of small bowel needed for survival in patients with short gut syndrome. We compared the results of small and large bowel transplant (SLBTx), small bowel transplant only (SBTx), and SBTx with the ileocecal valve (ICVTx) in a porcine model. Total enterectomy was performed on 18 Yorkshire-Landrace pigs followed by orthotopic SBLTx (n = 6), SBTx (n = 6), and ICVTx (n = 6). A jejunostomy and an ileostomy were constructed for biopsies. Overall mean survival was 17 d with no statistically significant difference between groups. Rejection was seen in 6/6 SLBTx, 4/6 SBTx, and 4/6 ICVTx recipients. Acute rejection was seen in 84.3% of SLBTx, 52.3% of SBTx, and 42.5% of the ICVTx mucosal biopsy samples. Two cases of intra-abdominal infection were in the ICVTx group only. Weight loss was 147 g/d in the SLBTx group, 643 g/d in the SBTx group, and 393 g/d in the ICVTx group. While the functional outcome after SLBTx and ICVTx was noticeably better than the SBTx group, the increased rejection and intra-abdominal infection rates make transplanting the large bowel or the ileocecal valve a less attractive clinical option.

Comparison of jejunal and ileal surveillance biopsies in a porcine model of intestinal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The optimal biopsy site of bowel allografts for rejection surveillance remains controversial. We compared the results of jejunal (JBx) and ileal (IBx) biopsies after bowel transplantation in a porcine model. METHODS: Eighteen Yorkshire-Landrace pigs served as donors. Eighteen recipient pigs underwent total enterectomy followed by orthotopic small bowel transplantation with or without the colon. A jejunostomy and a Bishop-Koop ileostomy were constructed for biopsies. Immunosuppression consisted of FK506 (target level 10-15 ng/ml by enzyme immunoparticle assay) and prednisone administered via the jejunostomy. Simultaneous JBx and IBx were performed twice weekly. Acute rejection was graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on previously published criteria. RESULTS: Mean overall survival after the transplant was 17.4 days. A total of 162 specimens were collected and evaluated for rejection (JBx, 81; IBx, 81). Acute rejection was detected in 41 JBx cases (50.7%) and 40 IBx cases (49.4%). The presence or absence of rejection was concordant between JBx and IBx in 70 of 81 case pairs (86.4%). Of the 11 discordant case pairs, 6 were JBx positive/IBx negative, whereas 5 were JBx negative/IBx positive. A total of 35 case pairs were synchronously positive, 24 (68.8%) of which demonstrated the same degree of rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between JBx and IBx of bowel allografts in diagnosing the presence of acute rejection is quite good. However, performing IBx alone would have missed about 7.5% of the rejection episodes. Because the early treatment of rejection in bowel transplantation is of paramount importance, in selected cases, biopsies from both the ileum and jejunum should be considered if technically feasible.

A prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in black recipients of primary cadaveric renal transplants.

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine (CSA) in black primary cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients. METHODS: Between December 1994 and February 1997, 35 black primary CRT recipients were enrolled in this trial. All patients received 7 days of induction therapy with OKT3. Fourteen patients received FK506 and prednisone only. Twenty-one patients received CSA, azathioprine, and prednisone. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, plasma renin activity, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and cause of renal failure. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were 12 of 14 (86%) for the FK506 group and 20 of 21 (95%) for the CSA group (P = 0.71). Three patients died owing to cardiac events with functioning grafts. Acute rejection was 2 of 14 (14%) for the FK506 and 8 of 21 (38%) for the CSA group (P = 0.25). Two other patients on CSA were converted to FK506 as rescue for OKT3-resistant rejection. Mean serum cholesterol at 1 year was 198 +/- 45 mg/dL for the FK506 group and 244 +/- 49 mg/dL for the CSA group (P = 0.03). Mean serum creatinine at 1 year was 1.39 +/- 0.38 mg/dL for the FK506 group and 1.94 +/- 0.64 mg/dL for the CSA group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patient and graft survival were similar in both groups at 1 year posttransplant. Although statistically not significant, the incidence of acute rejection was lower in the FK506 group. Furthermore, FK506-treated patients had significantly lower serum creatinine and cholesterol levels at 1 year posttransplant.

Long-term outcome of a prospective trial of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Steroid withdrawal (SW) after kidney transplantation is desirable to avoid associated serious side effects. We studied the long-term outcome of a group of kidney transplant recipients who underwent SW. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1993, kidney transplant recipients (N = 12) who had posttransplantation diabetes were entered in a prospective trial of SW. These patients were compared with a demographically similar comparison cohort (N = 66). End points of the study were patient and graft survival, incidence of late acute and chronic rejection, and changes in diabetes management. RESULTS: Previously published data from the SW group at 15 months of follow-up indicated improvement in diabetes control without any adverse effect on patient or graft actuarial survival. At long-term follow-up (mean, 56 months) the improvement in diabetes management was not detectable. The incidence of late acute rejection in SW and cohort groups was 42% and 8%, respectively (P = .006). Likewise, the incidence of chronic rejection in the SW versus cohort group was 42% and 12%, respectively (P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Although SW appeared to be successful initially, our long-term data indicate that SW significantly increases the risk of late acute rejection and chronic rejection episodes without benefits in posttransplantation diabetes management. Steroid withdrawal in patients with posttransplantation diabetes should be approached with caution.