Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Eat Disord ; 11(1): 157, 2023 Sep 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37710324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As women continue to be more at risk from eating disorders, gender has often been a focus of concern in transcultural research. Yet feminist, qualitative studies which prioritize the voices of women/girls remain rare within transcultural work suggesting the need for greater interaction between these fields. This article seeks to contribute to the exploration of the applicability of feminist paradigmslargely developed in the West-to experiences of EDs in non-western contexts. METHODS: This article draws on semi-structured interviews with 12 women from urban China with self-reported experience of Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED) in order to explore the complex ways in which gender may be implicated within eating/body distress from a transcultural point of view. The data is analysed through Reflexive Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: The data analysis suggested two broad themes: (1) Chinese versus Western codes for judging female appearance: from surveillance to liberation (2) Discipline, appetite and control: the gendered/cultural meanings of binging and purging. In terms of the first theme, many participants had spent time in the West which was understood as a less regulated context in terms of gendered body surveillance and eating. Complicating existing assumptions about the 'Westernisation' thesis, different communication codes and peer interactions across Chinese and Western contexts played a central role in how participants experienced their bodies. In the second theme, binging and purging emerged as a way to manage a number of contradictions surrounding Chinese femininity, including respecting familial food cultures, contradictory discourses on female 'appetite', and the need to display a female body which signified cultural imperatives of self-restraint and discipline. CONCLUSIONS: The data emphasises the importance of examining the culturally specific meanings of eating problems and their gendered contexts, whilst there is clearly much that echoes Western feminist work on Western samples. Although limited, the study crucially points to the importance of examining how ED subcategories other than AN can be explored from a transcultural and feminist point of view.


This articles adopts a feminist approach to explore experiences of eating disorders (EDs) in China. Drawing upon interviews with 12 women from urban China with experience of self-reported Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED), it examines the relationships between eating problems and gender­from social norms regarding body and appearance to women's social roles. The vast majority of feminist work on EDs has been developed in the West. The article explores how applicable this research is to these women's experiences in China, whilst examining how the Chinese context highlights culturally specific aspects of EDs.

2.
J Eat Disord ; 10(1): 54, 2022 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35440011

RESUMO

Despite the long history of feminist research in the field and the clear relevance of questions of gender to this sphere, many continue to question the relevance of feminism for understanding and treating eating disorders in 2022. In this set of two papers, we explore some of the tensions, omissions and misconceptions which surround feminist approaches to eating disorders. At the core of these two papers is our assertion that such approaches can make significant contributions in the eating disorders field along six key lines: enriching the science of eating disorders, unpacking diagnostics, contextualizing treatment and prevention, attending to lived experiences, diversifying methodologies, and situating recoveries. In this first paper, we outline what feminist approaches are and dig into some key tensions that arise when feminist approaches come to the table. These include critiques of sociocultural approaches to understanding eating disorders, the relationship between feminist approaches and biological and genetic attributions for eating disorders, and the role of men. We then offer a key contribution that feminist approaches have made to eating disorders scholarship: an invitation to unpack diagnostic approaches and situate eating disorders within the landscape of food, weight, and shape concerns in the twenty-first century.


Feminist research has been contributing to the eating disorders field for decades; yet, there continue to be questions about its relevance in 2022. In this set of two papers, we explore some of the questions around and disagreements about feminist approaches to eating disorders. We argue that feminist approaches to eating disorders continue to matter because they enrich the science of eating disorders, help us to better understand and situate diagnoses, consider treatment and prevention in context, attend to lived experiences, broaden our approaches to doing research, and consider recovery in context. In this first paper, we outline what feminist approaches are and dig into some key tensions around them. These include how sociocultural approaches to understanding eating disorders have been critiqued, relationships between "biological" and "feminist" understandings of eating disorders, and the role of men. We then consider one of the key contributions feminist approaches has made in the field: an invitation to think about eating disorder diagnoses in relation to contemporary concerns about food, weight, and shape.

3.
J Eat Disord ; 10(1): 55, 2022 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35440024

RESUMO

The role of feminism in eating disorders research, treatment, and advocacy continues to be debated, with little agreement in sight about the role-or lack thereof-of feminist eating disorders work. In these debates, the opportunity to open fruitful conversations about eating disorders that generate new possibilities for researching, treating, and preventing them is missed. This article is the second in a series of two papers that invite such a discussion. In this article, we focus on five key contributions that feminist eating disorder work has made and can make moving forward. These are contextualizing treatment, attending to lived experiences, expanding the meanings of "sociocultural influences," diversifying methodologies, and situating recoveries. We do not propose to offer a "final word" on feminisms and eating disorders, but instead to start conversations about how we understand, research, and treat eating disorders.


There continue to be debates about what role, if any, feminism has to play in eating disorders research, treatment, and advocacy. In these debates, we sometimes miss the chance to engage in productive dialogue about what the past and present of feminist eating disorders research, treatment, and prevention can offer­and where it might grow. This article, the second in a series of two papers that invite such a discussion, focuses on five key contributions that feminist eating disorder work has made and can make moving forward. These are: considering treatment in context, attending to lived experiences, thinking about the meaning of "sociocultural influences," broadening our approaches to doing research, and considering recovery in context. We do not intend this work to offer a "final word" on the role of feminisms for eating disorders. Instead, we want to spark and continue conversations about how we understand, research, and treat eating disorders.

4.
Sociol Health Illn ; 40(4): 670-686, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29466825

RESUMO

Eating disorders (EDs) have often been discussed as a risk to reproductive health. But existing research is quantitative in nature, paying no attention to issues of patient experience. In discussing data from 24 semi-structured interviews, this article draws on sociological approaches to medical 'risk' and feminist approaches to EDs to explore how women with experience of an ED responded to fertility warnings within treatment contexts. In doing so, it is suggested that responses to fertility warnings offer unique insight into the potentially damaging limitations of biomedical approaches to eating problems and their focus on EDs as individual 'pathologies' (rather than culturally embedded expressions of gendered embodiment). At best warnings are seen as making problematic assumptions about the aspirations of female patients, which may curtail feelings of agency and choice. At worst, they may push women further into destructive bodily and eating practices, and silence the distress that may be articulated by an ED.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/complicações , Feminismo , Fertilidade/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Sociologia Médica
5.
Health (London) ; 22(6): 541-557, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28649862

RESUMO

Eating disorders are now often approached as biopsychosocial problems, because they are widely recognised as multifactorial in origin. However, it has been suggested that there is a substantial and unwarranted imbalance within this biopsychosocial framework, with the 'social' aspects of the equation relegated to secondary or facilitating factors within treatment contexts. Drawing on data from 12 qualitative interviews with health professionals in a UK region, this article examines the extent to which sociocultural perspectives on eating disorders are valued and explored in eating disorder treatment, with a particular focus on the relationship between eating disorders and gender. As girls/women are widely acknowledged to be disproportionately affected by eating problems, the article draws on feminist perspectives on eating disorders to explore whether the relationships between cultural constructions of femininity and experiences of body/eating distress are actively addressed within treatment. The study reveals high levels of inconsistency in this regard, as while some participants see such issues as central to treatment, others have 'never really considered' them before. In addition, the study examines the potential limitations of how such sociocultural issues are conceptualised and addressed, as well as why they might be marginalised in the current climate of evidence-based eating disorder treatment. The article then considers the implications of the findings for thinking about feminist perspectives on eating disorders - and the significance of gender in treatment - at the level of both research and practice.


Assuntos
Imagem Corporal , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Adulto , Feminino , Feminilidade , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Reino Unido
6.
J Eat Disord ; 5: 36, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29158897

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Eating disorders (EDs) are now often approached as biopsychosocial problems. But it has been suggested by scholars interested in sociocultural factors that all is not equal within this biospsychosocial framework, with the 'social' aspects of the equation relegated to secondary factors within ED treatment contexts. Although sociocultural influences are well-established as risk factors for EDs, the exploration of whether or how such perspectives are useful in treatment has been little explored. In responding to this context, this article seeks to discuss and evaluate a 10 week closed group intervention based on feminist approaches to EDs at a residential eating disorder clinic in the East of England. METHODS: The data was collected via one-to-one qualitative interviews and then analysed using thematic discourse analysis. RESULTS: The participants suggested that the groups were helpful in enabling them to situate their problem within a broader cultural and group context, that they could operate as a form of 'protection' from ideologies regarding femininity, and that a focus on the societal contexts for EDs could potentially reduce feelings of self-blame. At the same time, the research pointed to the complexities of participants considering societal rather than individualised explanations for their problems, whilst it also confronted the implications of ambivalent responses toward feminism. CONCLUSIONS: Highly visible sociocultural factors in EDs - such as gender - may often be overlooked in ED clinical contexts. Although based on limited data, this research raises questions about the marginalisation of sociocultural factors in treatment, and the benefits and challenges including the latter may involve.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA