RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes and safety of conservative management of lichen sclerosus urethral stricture disease (LS-USD). METHODS: This multi-institutional study included patients with LS-USD managed with endoscopic procedures or clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) regimens between 2005 and 2019. Those with an obliterative stricture, a history of prior urethral reconstruction, or <3 months follow-up was excluded. Primary outcome measures were urinary tract infection (UTI), acute urinary retention (AUR), serum creatinine, and uroflowmetry values. Secondary outcome measures included patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires on urinary and sexual function. Failure was defined as progression to reconstructive surgery or permanent indwelling catheterization. RESULTS: 112 men were analyzed with a median follow-up of 30.0 months (IQR 12.0-55.5). Median age was 52.5 years (IQR 42.6-61.0) and median body mass index was 34.5 kg/m2 (IQR 29.9-40.7). Median stricture length was 12.0 cm (IQR 2.8-20.0). 89% of patients underwent urethral balloon dilation, with a median of 2 (IQR 1-3) per patient. CIC was performed in 46% of patients, with 31% of this subgroup using intraurethral steroids. 84% of patients avoided invasive surgery or permanent indwelling catheterization, with an improvement in urethral stricture patient-reported outcome measure scores (P = .0013). Those who failed were more likely to have a history of UTI (P = .04), urosepsis (P = .03), AUR (P <.001), and more likely to perform CIC (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Over medium-term follow-up, most patients with LS-USD were safely managed with conservative techniques. Caution is warranted in those who develop UTIs, urosepsis, and AUR and the potential long-term consequences of repetitive conservative interventions must be considered.
Assuntos
Líquen Escleroso e Atrófico/complicações , Estreitamento Uretral/terapia , Tratamento Conservador , Dilatação , Seguimentos , Humanos , Cateterismo Uretral Intermitente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estreitamento Uretral/etiologiaRESUMO
Introduction and Objectives: The goal of this study is to evaluate the outcomes in a cohort of patients who underwent minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) at a single institution from 2017 to 2019. Methods: Sixty patients at a single institution with two different surgeons underwent MIP from 2017 to 2019. The MIP technique uses a proprietary nephroscope with a "vacuum" technique for stone evacuation. Patients were identified who had postoperative CT scan imaging available for direct review. A prospectively maintained database was queried along with retrospective chart review to evaluate the stone-free rate defined as no stones on CT imaging. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed including initial stone size, access type (fluoroscopic vs ultrasonic), access location, operative positioning (supine vs prone), operative time, and 60-day complications. Results: Forty-six of 60 patients had CT imaging postoperatively that were reviewable. Of these, 43% (n = 20) were stone free as defined by no identifiable fragments seen, 11% (n = 5) had residual fragments 0 to 2 mm, 7% (n = 3) had residual fragments 2 to 4 mm, and 39% (n = 18) had residual fragments >4 mm. Mean initial stone size was 21 mm (1.9-84 mm). Sixty percent (n = 28) of the patients were discharged the same day as surgery. Fifty-one percent (n = 24) of access was achieved through ultrasound alone. Seventeen percent of patients (n = 8) had a complication within 30 days of surgery. All complications were Clavien III or lower with unplanned return to operating room rate of 2% (n = 1). Conclusions: We present North America's first single institution analysis of MIP cases with acceptable outcomes comparable with both retrograde intrarenal surgery and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The exact role of MIP in renal stone disease needs to be determined by future studies that critically assess their outcomes.
Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea , Nefrostomia Percutânea , Humanos , Rim , Cálculos Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, effect of radiotherapy, and complications of direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) and intralesional mitomycin C (MMC) for recurrent bladder neck contracture/vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (BNC/VUAS). METHODS: Patients who underwent DVIU with intralesional MMC for recurrent BNC/VUAS between 2007 and 2019 at 2 institutions were included. Cold knife incisions were performed in a reproducible fashion followed by injection of 0.3-0.4 mg/mL MMC at each incision site. Those with evidence of complete urethral obliteration, stenosis of the entire posterior urethra, or <3 months follow-up were excluded. Success was defined as the ability to pass a 17-French cystoscope postoperatively without the need for catheterization or additional procedures. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were analyzed over a median follow-up of 21.1 months. Around 91% had at least 1 prior DVIU, 56% had at least 1 prior dilation, and 44% presented with an indwelling catheter or performed intermittent catheterization. Success was achieved in 65% after 1 procedure, an additional 18% after 2 procedures, and another 7% after 3 or more procedures (90% overall success rate). Nonradiated patients showed a higher overall success rate compared to radiated patients (94% vs 76%, P = 0.04). Of the 9 cystoscopic failures, 5 were asymptomatic and pursued observation. Only 2 (5%) patients with a history of catheterization required this postoperatively. Two patients underwent subsequent urinary diversion surgery. No long-term complications were seen. CONCLUSION: DVIU with low-dose MMC remains a safe and effective BNC/VUAS treatment. A patent bladder neck was achieved in >90% of nonradiated patients and >75% of radiated patients.
Assuntos
Mitomicina/administração & dosagem , Estreitamento Uretral , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Criocirurgia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais , Masculino , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Uretra/cirurgia , Estreitamento Uretral/tratamento farmacológico , Estreitamento Uretral/radioterapia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/radioterapiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide the reader an understanding of the importance and limitations of prostate cancer (PCa) screening, the heritable component of PCa and the role that germline genetic markers can play in risk-adapted screening and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite strong science supporting the association of germline genetic change with PCa risk and outcome, there has been a reluctance to pursue practical application of these technologies. Recent findings suggest that actionable information may now be garnered from this form of testing, which can help men at risk for and with PCa. SUMMARY: This is an exciting time whereby germline genetic markers can help overcome some of the shortcomings of current PCa screening and treatment paradigms. Understanding their benefit and limitations while keeping the patient's best interest in mind will be the key for the responsible application of these exciting technologies.
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Penetrância , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been described for highly selected patients. We sought to assess the safety and feasibility of outpatient PCNL in a tertiary referral stone center without strict patient selection criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all PCNLs performed at our institution from September 2015 to October 2016. Of the 97 eligible cases, 60 patients underwent planned outpatient PCNL. Primary outcome was complication rate, and secondary outcome determined predictor variables of inpatient admission. RESULTS: Thirty-seven inpatient and 60 planned outpatient (one bilateral) PCNLs were performed with 65% and 44% American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, respectively. The 30-day overall complication rate for the inpatient and planned outpatient groups was 27% and 20%, respectively (p = 0.43) [70% and 92% Clavien grades I-II]. Emergency department presentation within 30 days was 19% and 18% (p = 0.94), and unplanned hospital readmission rate was 3% and 10% (p = 0.05). The 37 inpatient PCNL patients had larger total stone burden than outpatient cases (40.7 vs 25.8 mm, p = 0.0014); more often required two or more punctures into the kidney during the procedure (73% vs 45%, p = 0.025); and more often had supracostal access (20% vs 7%, p = 0.05). For the outpatient PCNL cohort, 72% patients were discharged same day, 28% were observed overnight for refractory symptoms or social reasons. Outpatient cohort radiographic stone-free rate by CT (no stones) was 67%. CONCLUSION: Outpatient PCNL has been safely and effectively performed within our institution in moderate-sized stones almost regardless of comorbidity status. We suggest that this approach is a potential algorithmic change in centers with sufficient case volume.
Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Ambulatório Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Objective quantification of surgical skill is imperative as we enter a healthcare environment of quality improvement and performance-based reimbursement. The gold standard tools are infrequently used due to time-intensiveness, cost inefficiency, and lack of standard practices. We hypothesized that valid performance scores of surgical skill can be obtained through crowdsourcing. METHODS: Twelve surgeons of varying robotic surgical experience performed live porcine robot-assisted urinary bladder closures. Blinded video-recorded performances were scored by expert surgeon graders and by Amazon's Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing crowd workers using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills tool assessing five technical skills domains. Seven expert graders and 50 unique Mechanical Turkers (each paid $0.75/survey) evaluated each video. Global assessment scores were analyzed for correlation and agreement. RESULTS: Six hundred Mechanical Turkers completed the surveys in less than 5 hours, while seven surgeon graders took 14 days. The duration of video clips ranged from 2 to 11 minutes. The correlation coefficient between the Turkers' and expert graders' scores was 0.95 and Cronbach's Alpha was 0.93. Inter-rater reliability among the surgeon graders was 0.89. CONCLUSION: Crowdsourcing surgical skills assessment yielded rapid inexpensive agreement with global performance scores given by expert surgeon graders. The crowdsourcing method may provide surgical educators and medical institutions with a boundless number of procedural skills assessors to efficiently quantify technical skills for use in trainee advancement and hospital quality improvement.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Crowdsourcing/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Animais , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Suínos , Gravação em VídeoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Crowdsourcing is the practice of obtaining services from a large group of people, typically an online community. Validated methods of evaluating surgical video are time-intensive, expensive, and involve participation of multiple expert surgeons. We sought to obtain valid performance scores of urologic trainees and faculty on a dry-laboratory robotic surgery task module by using crowdsourcing through a web-based grading tool called Crowd Sourced Assessment of Technical Skill (CSATS). METHODS: IRB approval was granted to test the technical skills grading accuracy of Amazon.com Mechanical Turk™ crowd-workers compared to three expert faculty surgeon graders. The two groups assessed dry-laboratory robotic surgical suturing performances of three urology residents (PGY-2, -4, -5) and two faculty using three performance domains from the validated Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills assessment tool. RESULTS: After an average of 2 hours 50 minutes, each of the five videos received 50 crowd-worker assessments. The inter-rater reliability (IRR) between the surgeons and crowd was 0.91 using Cronbach's alpha statistic (confidence intervals=0.20-0.92), indicating an agreement level between the two groups of "excellent." The crowds were able to discriminate the surgical level, and both the crowds and the expert faculty surgeon graders scored one senior trainee's performance above a faculty's performance. CONCLUSION: Surgery-naive crowd-workers can rapidly assess varying levels of surgical skill accurately relative to a panel of faculty raters. The crowds provided rapid feedback and were inexpensive. CSATS may be a valuable adjunct to surgical simulation training as requirements for more granular and iterative performance tracking of trainees become mandated and commonplace.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Internato e Residência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Treinamento por Simulação , Técnicas de Sutura/educação , Urologia/educação , Gravação em Vídeo , Crowdsourcing/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Humanos , Médicos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/educaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Validated methods of objective assessments of surgical skills are resource intensive. We sought to test a web-based grading tool using crowdsourcing called Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skill. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval was granted to test the accuracy of Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk and Facebook crowdworkers compared with experienced surgical faculty grading a recorded dry-laboratory robotic surgical suturing performance using three performance domains from a validated assessment tool. Assessor free-text comments describing their rating rationale were used to explore a relationship between the language used by the crowd and grading accuracy. RESULTS: Of a total possible global performance score of 3-15, 10 experienced surgeons graded the suturing video at a mean score of 12.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.11-13.11). Mechanical Turk and Facebook graders rated the video at mean scores of 12.21 (95% CI, 11.98-12.43) and 12.06 (95% CI, 11.57-12.55), respectively. It took 24 h to obtain responses from 501 Mechanical Turk subjects, whereas it took 24 d for 10 faculty surgeons to complete the 3-min survey. Facebook subjects (110) responded within 25 d. Language analysis indicated that crowdworkers who used negation words (i.e., "but," "although," and so forth) scored the performance more equivalently to experienced surgeons than crowdworkers who did not (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: For a robotic suturing performance, we have shown that surgery-naive crowdworkers can rapidly assess skill equivalent to experienced faculty surgeons using Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skill. It remains to be seen whether crowds can discriminate different levels of skill and can accurately assess human surgery performances.