Clinical effectiveness of basic root canal treatment after 24 months: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of basic root canal treatment (BRT) with tactile working length determination in terms of radiographic and clinical outcome parameters compared with endodontic treatment with standard radiographic working length control. METHODS: This was a clinical, multicenter, controlled, open-label trial to evaluate BRT effectiveness after 24 months. The primary end point was the apical extension score of the radiographic quality parameter of root canal fillings. The secondary radiographic end point was the periapical index, and the secondary clinical end point was tooth tender to percussion. The safety end point was tooth loss as a consequence of endodontic failure. Statistical analyses of binary and categoric data were calculated using cross tables and the chi-square test. RESULTS: BRT with tactile working length determination compared with standard radiographic working length control did not significantly differ in terms of radiographic and clinical outcomes after 24 months. The apical extension of the root canal fillings and the periapical anatomic structures showed no significant differences according to radiographic analyses (P = .5). Corresponding results were found in clinical aspects of tooth tender to percussion (P = .6) and tooth loss (P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: Tactile working length determination in BRT resulted in comparable treatment outcomes compared with standard endodontic treatment with radiographic working length control and turned out to be an accurate method in BRT.

Development of a basic root canal treatment (BRT) for primary oral health care--evaluation after one year.

OBJECTIVES: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) was a major step forward in community dentistry but treatment options for deep carious lesions or pulp involvement still focus on tooth extraction in under-served areas worldwide. To bridge the gap between ART and extraction this pilot study aimed to develop and follow-up a basic root canal treatment for rural dental health facilities in the Republic of The Gambia (West Africa), faced with an environment lacking technical equipment and developing primary oral health care. METHODS: 25 single rooted teeth with acute irreversible pulpitis were root canal treated with a standardised endodontic instrument kit and a specific procedure. A step-back technique was used with intermittent chlorhexidine 0.2% and saline irrigation. Root canal obturation was performed using a single-cone technique with gutta-percha using Grossman's root canal cement. Coronal filling was carried out by using ART. Clinical examinations were documented before treatment, one day, five days, six months and twelve months postoperatively. RESULTS: None of the root canal fillings had to be revised due to postoperative complications. In 9 out of 25 teeth, transitory apical pain disappeared after a few days. After six months, all ART fillings appeared clinically acceptable, two fillings had to be corrected. Four class II restorations and three class IV restorations needed replacement after 12 months. Patients' assessment of health related quality of life improved significantly, especially concerning dental pain, chewing ability and fitness for work. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary clinical follow-ups showed encouraging results for the basic root canal treatment approach. Longitudinal clinical studies with greater populations are required to substantiate these results. Modifications in the coronal filling technique are preferable to improve the clinical performance of extended ART cavity restorations.