Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Endod J ; 57(2): 146-163, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38054567

RESUMO

AIM: To determine and explain the principal sources of stress among preclinical and clinical dental undergraduate students with a particular focus on the stressors linked to endodontics. METHODOLOGY: A mixed-methods study, with an explanatory sequential design, was employed. Volunteer students of second, third and fourth years were asked to complete both the Dental Environment Stress (DES) questionnaire and a bespoke questionnaire for endodontic-related stress assessment, which had 21 questions in common with the DES. The results were analysed by Kruskal-Wallis and Marginal Homogeneity tests. In the second part of the study, a qualitative phase was conducted through focus group interviews of students from each academic year included in the study. Interviews were analysed by inductive content analysis. RESULTS: The DES questionnaire determined that for all years the most stressful domains were 'performance pressure', 'workload' and 'clinical training'. According to the endodontic stress questionnaire, the most stressful domains were 'self-efficacy beliefs', 'endodontic clinical training' and 'faculty and administration' in early years, while they were 'endodontic patient treatment', 'performance pressure in endodontics' and 'clinical training' in later years. Comparing questions common to both questionnaires revealed that the stress score was lower for the endodontic stress questionnaire than in the DES questionnaire for 17 questions, being significantly lower for 13 questions (p < 0.05) and significantly higher for no question. The qualitative study showed that students' dental and endodontic-related stress was linked to different domains: patient, clinical procedure, organization, staff, academic education, evaluation and COVID-19-related issues. Qualitative aspects highlighted the important role that patients and COVID-19 have played in student stress. However, they suggested a possible explanation for the lower endodontic stress observed in this dental university hospital, which was based on: the nature of the teaching in endodontics, the consensus between endodontic supervisors, the use of a logical, progressive procedure and the considerable experience that students gain over the years. CONCLUSION: Students considered endodontics stressful; however, education can play a central role in reducing stress, particularly during the early parts of the undergraduate course.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Endodontia , Humanos , Pandemias , Educação em Odontologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Endodontia/educação , Estudantes , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 28(12): 1696-700, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24456040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A semiautomated hand-held device has been introduced in some phototherapy centres to establish the minimal erythema dose (MED) before treatment with narrowband ultraviolet (NBUV) B. OBJECTIVES: To compare the semiautomated hand-held device with the conventional method of MED testing (a UV-opaque template and a panel of UVB fluorescent tubes), using the same series of incremented doses. METHODS: Twenty-four patients referred for treatment with NBUVB phototherapy were included. Each patient had MED testing with the conventional method and the semiautomated hand-held device at the same level of the left and right back. The results were read by four investigators each time. RESULTS: The semiautomated hand-held device was a significant estimator of the MED using the conventional panel method (P < 0.001; r = 0.97). The average ratio of the hand-held MED to the conventional MED was 67%. The mean difference between the methods was 165 mJ/cm(2) . The interobserver test showed very high agreement for both methods of MED testing (Cronbach α coefficient 0.97 for the hand-held MED tester vs. 0.93 for the conventional method). CONCLUSIONS: The semiautomated hand-held device MED results were lower than that of the conventional panel method and may prolong the treatment course by 2-3 treatments. The hand-held tester is a fast and reproducible method, and may allow more phototherapy units, limited by staff and time, to do MED testing.


Assuntos
Automação , Equipamentos e Provisões , Eritema/etiologia , Fototerapia/efeitos adversos , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Eczema/terapia , Eritema/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/terapia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...