Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiat Oncol ; 13(1): 29, 2018 Feb 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29463267

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy via volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) could preserve the neurocognitive function (NCF) of patients with primary brain tumors treated with radiotherapy. METHODS: We reviewed data from patients with primary brain tumors who underwent hippocampal-sparing brain radiotherapy via VMAT between February 2014 and December 2015. The optimization criteria for the contralateral hippocampus was a maximum dose (Dmax) of less than 17 Gy. For NCF evaluations, the Seoul Verbal Learning Test for total recall, delayed recall, and recognition (SVLT-TR, DR, and Recognition) was performed at baseline and at seven months after radiotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients underwent NCF testing seven months after radiotherapy. Their median age was 49.5 years (range 26-77 years), and 14 (53.8%) had grade III/IV tumors. The median Dmax to the contralateral hippocampus was 16.4 Gy (range 3.5-63.4). The median mean dose to the contralateral hippocampus, expressed as equivalent to a 2-Gy dose (EQD2/2), was 7.4 Gy2 (0.7-13.1). The mean relative changes in SVLT-TR, SVLT-DR, and SVLT-Recognition at seven months compared to the baseline were - 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], - 19.6% to 4.2%), - 9.2% (95% CI, - 25.4% to 7.0%), and - 3.4% (- 12.7% to 5.8%), respectively. Two patients (7.7%) showed deteriorated NCF in the SVLT-TR and SVLT-DR, and three (11.5%) in the SVLT-Recognition. The mean dose of the left hippocampus and bilateral hippocampi were significantly higher in patients showing deterioration of the SVLT-TR and SVLT-Recognition than in those without deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: The contralateral hippocampus could be effectively spared in patients with primary brain tumor via VMAT to preserve the verbal memory function. Further investigation is needed to identify those patients who will most benefit from hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy of the primary brain tumor.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Hipocampo/efeitos da radiação , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/prevenção & controle , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Estado Mental e Demência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Lesões por Radiação/psicologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 192(7): 473-80, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27221313

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) aims to preserve neurocognitive functions in patients undergoing brain radiotherapy (RT). Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) involves intensity-modulated RT using a coplanar arc. An inclined head position might improve dose distribution during HS-WBRT using VMAT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed 8 patients receiving brain RT with inclined head positioning. A comparable set of CT images simulating a non-inclined head position was obtained by rotating the original CT set. HS-WBRT plans of coplanar VMAT for each CT set were generated with a prescribed dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Maximum dose to the hippocampi was limited to 16 Gy; to the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and eyeballs this was confined to less than 37.5 Gy; for the lenses to 8 Gy. Dosimetric parameters of the two different plans of 8 patients were compared with paired t-test. RESULTS: Mean inclined head angle was 11.09 ± 0.73°. The homogeneity (HI) and conformity (CI) indexes demonstrated improved results, with an average 8.4 ± 10.0 % (p = 0.041) and 5.3 ± 3.9 % (p = 0.005) reduction, respectively, in the inclined vs. non-inclined position. The inclined head position had lower hippocampi Dmin (10.45 ± 0.36 Gy), Dmax (13.70 ± 0.25 Gy), and Dmean (12.01 ± 0.38 Gy) values vs. the non-inclined head position (Dmin = 12.07 ± 1.07 Gy; Dmax = 15.70 ± 1.25 Gy; Dmean = 13.91 ± 1.01 Gy), with 12.8 ± 8.9 % (p = 0.007), 12.2 ± 6.8 % (p = 0.003), and 13.2 ± 7.2 % (p = 0.002) reductions, respectively. Mean Dmax for the lenses was 6.34 ± 0.72 Gy and 7.60 ± 0.46 Gy, respectively, with a 16.3 ± 10.8 % reduction in the inclined position (p = 0.004). Dmax for the optic nerve and Dmean for the eyeballs also decreased by 7.0 ± 5.9 % (p = 0.015) and 8.4 ± 7.2 % (p = 0.015), respectively. CONCLUSION: Inclining the head position to approximately 11° during HS-WBRT using VMAT improved dose distribution in the planning target volume and allowed lower doses to the hippocampi and optic apparatus.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Irradiação Craniana/métodos , Traumatismos Oculares/prevenção & controle , Hipocampo/efeitos da radiação , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicações , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Irradiação Craniana/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos Oculares/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Oculares/etiologia , Feminino , Cabeça/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição à Radiação/análise , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...