Rituximab induction and reinduction in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: A retrospective multicenter study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) under rituximab induction and reinduction therapy in Taiwan. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in patients with GPA or MPA receiving rituximab therapy from August 2008 to July 2020 in seven medical centers in Taiwan. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 53 patients (18 with GPA and 35 with MPA) were included. Kidney involvement (82.9% vs. 22.2%, p < .001) and initial creatinine (3.25 ± 2.37 vs. 1.07 ± 0.82, p < .001) were significantly higher in MPA. Within 24 weeks after the first course of rituximab, there were seven deaths (five due to infection and two due to active disease) in patients with MPA (7/35, 20%) compared to 0 in patients with GPA. Of 33 patients receiving rituximab for kidney involvement, 23 survived and were free from renal replacement therapy at 24 weeks. Their chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages improved in 2 but progressed in 7, while 24 had stable CKD stages. Death or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was associated with infection and higher initial creatinine. Reinduction therapy for relapse was required in 18 (39.1%) of 46 survivors, which was associated with anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) positive (odds ratio 3.667, p = .049) and younger age with a cutoff of 49.4 (AUC = 0.679, p = .030, sensitivity = 66.67%, specificity = 75%). CONCLUSION: Significant mortality occurred after rituximab induction, especially in patients with MPA. In survivors, age younger than 50 and anti-PR3 positive were associated with the risk of relapse requiring reinduction.

A Streamlined Diagnostic Process Improved the Outcomes of Patients with Adult-Onset Still's Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is often delayed due to its clinical heterogeneity and lack of pathognomic features. Hence, there is an unmet need for an efficient diagnostic process. The major aim of this study was to compare the differences in disease outcomes between two groups of AOSD patients with and without implementation of the streamlined diagnostic process (SDP). METHODS: Of 172 febrile patients with skin rash and/or arthralgia, 112 individuals had AOSD. The tentative diagnosis of AOSD or non-AOSD was made with or without the SDP implementation. The selection criteria for AOSD outcomes analysis were as follows: (1) age at study entry older than 20 years, (2) fulfillment of the Yamaguchi criteria for AOSD diagnosis, and (3) a follow-up period longer than 6 months after initiation of therapy. Three outcome parameters were evaluated, including diagnosis lag period, the proportion of "early diagnosis," and the proportion of achieving disease remission after a 6-month therapy. RESULTS: The SDP was implemented for expediting AOSD diagnosis in 41 (36%) enrolled patients (SDP-implemented group). The diagnosis lag period was significantly shorter in the SDP-implemented group (median 2.0 weeks, interquartile range [IQR] 1.0-2.5 weeks) than in the non-SDP-implemented group (4.0 weeks, IQR 2.0-6.0 weeks, p < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of "early diagnosis" was also found in the SDP-implemented group (75.6%) compared with the non-SDP-implemented group (33.8%, p < 0.001). We revealed a significantly higher proportion of achieving remission in the SDP-implemented group (85.4%) compared with the non-SDP-implemented group (67.6%, p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed SDP implementation as a potential predictor of achieving disease remission. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an SDP for expediting diagnosis could improve outcomes for AOSD patients. This diagnostic process increased the early diagnosis rate and led to a higher disease remission rate. However, the beneficial effects of SDP implementation need further external validation.