A non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient with leptomeningeal metastasis harboring rare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations G719S and L861Q benefited from doubling dosage of osimertinib: a case report.

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a rare but lethal complication of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has a devastating impact on patient survival and quality of life. Osimertinib, an irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved as a therapy for advanced NSCLC with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. However, the efficacy and optimal dosage of osimertinib in the treatment of NSCLC patients with LM who harbor uncommon EGFR mutations have yet to be fully investigated. Herein, we report a case of an advanced NSCLC patient with LM carrying EGFR G719S and L861Q, who was successfully treated by osimertinib at 160 mg. The patient initially presented with clear cell renal carcinoma and renal metastatic adenocarcinoma, and underwent right nephrectomy. At 2 months after nephrectomy, he developed a disturbance of consciousness and was subsequently diagnosed with NSCLC with LM by meningeal biopsy pathology and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. Next-generation sequencing detected the rare EGFR mutations G719S and L861R in the meningeal biopsy tissues. The patient was then administered osimertinib at 80 mg quaque die (QD); after 1 month of treatment, his symptoms were alleviated. However, two months later, he experienced epileptic episode. Subsequently, the osimertinib dosage was doubled to 160 mg QD. After 1 month of treatment, the patient achieved central nervous system (CNS) response, and at the time of this manuscript's submission, he had maintained stable disease (SD) for more than 1 year. To our knowledge, this study provides the first clinical evidence that the administration of osimertinib at 160 mg once daily can achieve an encouraging, durable response in an NSCLC patient with LM carrying EGFR G719S and L861Q.

Bevacizumab rescue therapy extends the survival in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively studied the efficacy of bevacizumab as salvage therapy for recurrent malignant glioma with a focus on the overall survival (OS). METHODS: Patients who received a therapy other than surgery for recurrent malignant glioma were included. Efficacy was evaluated using MRI. Neurological function was evaluated using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO). The survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with recurrent glioma (31 grade III, 20 grade IV) were included. Among them, 22 subjects (43.1%) received bevacizumab. The median OS was 10.2 months (range, 1 to 27 months). Patients receiving bevacizumab had comparable OS (a median of 9.9 vs. 10.0 months) and similar 6-month survival rate (43% vs. 34%) to those who did not receive bevacizumab. A subgroup analysis failed to notice any significant difference in grade III glioma patients receiving bevacizumab vs. those who did not. The median survival was significantly longer at 8.9 months (range, 4 to 13 months) in grade IV glioma patients receiving bevacizumab than in those who did not (5.6 months, range, 2 to 7 months, P=0.042). The 6-month survival rate was higher (83%) in those who received bevacizumab than in those who did not (47%, P=0.046). No grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab, as a rescue therapy, provides a survival benefit for recurrent grade IV glioma.