Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Neurooncol ; 153(3): 417-424, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34120277

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Understanding factors that influence technology diffusion is central to clinical translation of novel therapies. We characterized the pattern of adoption for laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), also known as stereotactic laser ablation (SLA), in neuro-oncology using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS: We identified patients age ≥ 18 in the NIS (2012-2018) with a diagnosis of primary or metastatic brain tumor that underwent LITT or craniotomy. We compared characteristics and outcomes for patients that underwent these procedures. RESULTS: LITT utilization increased ~ 400% relative to craniotomy during the study period. Despite this increase, the total number of LITT procedures performed for brain tumor was < 1% of craniotomy. After adjusting for this time trend, LITT patients were less likely to have > 2 comorbidities (OR 0.64, CI95 0.51-0.79) or to be older (OR 0.92, CI95 0.86-0.99) and more likely to be female (OR 1.35, CI95 1.08-1.69), Caucasian compared to Black (OR 1.94, CI95 1.12-3.36), and covered by private insurance compared to Medicare or Medicaid (OR 1.38, CI95 1.09-1.74). LITT hospital stays were 50% shorter than craniotomy (IRR 0.52, CI95 0.45-0.61). However, charges related to the procedures were comparable between LITT and craniotomy ($1397 greater for LITT, CI95 $-5790 to $8584). CONCLUSION: For neuro-oncology indications, LITT utilization increased ~ 400% relative to craniotomy. Relative to craniotomy-treated patients, LITT-treated patients were likelier to be young, female, non-Black race, covered by private insurance, or with < 2 comorbidities. While the total hospital charges were comparable, LITT was associated with a shorter hospitalization relative to craniotomy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Terapia a Laser , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Lasers , Masculino , Medicare , Tecnologia , Estados Unidos
2.
J Hosp Med ; 14(12): 737-745, 2019 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31339840

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients are frequently treated with opioids for pain control, and receipt of opioids at hospital discharge may increase the risk of future chronic opioid use. OBJECTIVE: To compare inpatient analgesic prescribing patterns and patients' perception of pain control in the United States and non-US hospitals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Four hospitals in the US and seven in seven other countries. PARTICIPANTS: Medical inpatients reporting pain. MEASUREMENTS: Opioid analgesics dispensed during the first 24-36 hours of hospitalization and at discharge; assessments and beliefs about pain. RESULTS: We acquired completed surveys for 981 patients, 503 of 719 patients in the US and 478 of 590 patients in other countries. After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that more US patients were given opioids during their hospitalization compared with patients in other countries, regardless of whether they did or did not report taking opioids prior to admission (92% vs 70% and 71% vs 41%, respectively; P < .05), and similar trends were seen for opioids prescribed at discharge. Patient satisfaction, beliefs, and expectations about pain control differed between patients in the US and other sites. LIMITATIONS: Limited number of sites and patients/country. CONCLUSIONS: In the hospitals we sampled, our data suggest that physicians in the US may prescribe opioids more frequently during patients' hospitalizations and at discharge than their colleagues in other countries, and patients have different beliefs and expectations about pain control. Efforts to curb the opioid epidemic likely need to include addressing inpatient analgesic prescribing practices and patients' expectations regarding pain control.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Internacionalidade , Medição da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/epidemiologia , Dor/psicologia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/tendências , Medição da Dor/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente
4.
Endocr Pract ; 22(6): 673-8, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27176140

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We discuss the implementation and outcomes of a diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) critical care pathway (CCP) at a 462-bed teaching hospital. METHODS: A multi-disciplinary team implemented a DKA CCP that was translated into 3 computerized physician order entry (CPOE) order sets corresponding to the phases of DKA care. Historical and postintervention data were obtained via automated queries of the electronic medical record (EMR) and further analyzed by manual chart review. RESULTS: Average length of stay decreased from 104.3 to 72.9 hours (P = .0003) after implementation of a DKA CCP. CONCLUSION: Outcome data supports the use of a DKA CCP at our institution. ABBREVIATIONS: DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis CCP = critical care pathway EMR = electronic medical record CPOE = computerized physician order entry ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision LoS = length of stay SQL = standard query language.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...