The addition of a boost dose on the primary tumour bed after lumpectomy in breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. A summary of the results of EORTC 22881-10882 "boost versus no boost" trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of the boost dose to the primary tumour bed in the framework of breast conserving therapy on local control, cosmetic results, fibrosis and overall survival for patients with early stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five thousand five hundred and sixty-nine patients after lumpectomy followed by whole breast irradiation of 50 Gy were randomised. After a microscopically complete lumpectomy (5318 patients), the boost doses were either 0 or 16 Gy, while after a microscopically incomplete (251 patients) lumpectomy randomisation was between 10 and 26 Gy. The results at a median follow-up of 10 years are presented. RESULTS: At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 10.2% versus 6.2% for the 0 Gy and the 16 Gy boost groups (p < 0.0001) and 17.5% versus 10.8% for the 10 and 26 Gy boost groups, respectively (p > 0.1). There was no statistically significant interaction per age group but recurrences tended to occur earlier in younger patients. As younger patients had a higher cumulative risk of local relapse by year 10, the magnitude of the absolute 10-year risk reduction achieved with the boost decreased with increasing age. Development of fibrosis was significantly dependent on the boost dose with a 10-year rate for severe fibrosis of 1.6% after 0 Gy, 3.3% after 10 Gy, 4.4% after 16 Gy and 14.4% after 26 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION: An increase of the dose with 16 Gy improved local control for patients after a complete lumpectomy only. The development of fibrosis was clearly dose dependent. With 10 years median follow-up, no impact of survival was observed.

Can patient-, treatment- and pathology-related characteristics explain the high local recurrence rate following breast-conserving therapy in young patients?

The aim of this study was to identify patient-, tumour- or treatment-related factors associated with young age that might explain the higher risk of ipsilateral breast recurrence that occurs after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in young breast cancer patients. In the 'boost versus no boost trial', 5569 early-stage breast cancer patients were entered. All patients underwent tumorectomy followed by whole breast irradiation of 50 Gy. Patients having a microscopically complete excision were randomised between receiving no boost or a 16-Gy boost, while patients with a microscopically incomplete excision were randomised between receiving a boost dose of 10 or 26 Gy. The 5-year local control rate was 82% for patients 60 years of age (P<0.0001). In young patients, the tumour was significantly larger and more often oestrogen and progesterone receptor-negative. Invasive carcinoma and the intraductal component were more often of a high grade. The intraductal component was more frequently incompletely resected in young patients. Re-excisions were performed more often (most probably due to a more frequent incomplete excision at the first attempt). The total volume of breast tissue removed at the tumorectomy was smaller in the younger patient group, even after including the volume removed during re-excision. When relating all these parameters (including age itself) to local control, the multivariate analysis stratified by treatment showed that age was the only independent prognostic factor for local control (P=0.0001). Including the boost treatment as a separate covariate, the analysis retained age and boost treatment as significant factors related to local control (P<0.0001). It was shown that the boost dose significantly reduced the 5-year local recurrence rate from 7 to 4% for patients with a complete excision (P<0.001). For patients 40 years of age or younger, the boost dose reduced the local recurrence rate from 20 to 10% (P=0.002). This large European Orgnaization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial demonstrated an increased local recurrence rate in young patients. Although several associations between patient, tumour and treatment factors and age were found, that might explain the high local recurrence rate in the younger patients, it appears that age itself and the boost dose were the only factors that were independently related to local control.

Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy prevents local recurrence of breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. We evaluated the effect of a supplementary dose of radiation to the tumor bed on the rates of local recurrence among patients who received radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer. METHODS: After lumpectomy and axillary dissection, patients with stage I or II breast cancer received 50 Gy of radiation to the whole breast in 2-Gy fractions over a five-week period. Patients with a microscopically complete excision were randomly assigned to receive either no further local treatment (2657 patients) or an additional localized dose of 16 Gy, usually given in eight fractions by means of an external electron beam (2661 patients). RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 5.1 years, local recurrences were observed in 182 of the 2657 patients in the standard-treatment group and 109 of the 2661 patients in the additional-radiation group. The five-year actuarial rates of local recurrence were 7.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 6.8 to 7.6 percent) and 4.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 3.8 to 4.7 percent), respectively (P<0.001), yielding a hazard ratio for local recurrence of 0.59 (99 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.81) associated with an additional dose. Patients 40 years old or younger benefited most; at five years, their rate of local recurrence was 19.5 percent with standard treatment and 10.2 percent with additional radiation (hazard ratio, 0.46 [99 percent confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.89]; P=0.002). At five years in the age group 41 to 50 years old, no differences were found in rates of metastasis or overall survival (which were 87 and 91 percent, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early breast cancer who undergo breast-conserving surgery and receive 50 Gy of radiation to the whole breast, an additional dose of 16 Gy of radiation to the tumor bed reduces the risk of local recurrence, especially in patients younger than 50 years of age.

The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC 'boost vs. no boost' trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups.

PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of different patient, tumor, and treatment parameters on the cosmetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy at 3-year follow-up. A subjective and an objective cosmetic scoring method was used and the results of both methods were compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In EORTC trial 22881/10882, 5569 early-stage breast cancer patients were treated with tumorectomy and axillary dissection, followed by tangential fields irradiation of the breast to a dose of 50 Gy in 5 weeks, at 2 Gy per fraction. A total of 5318 patients, having a microscopically complete tumorectomy, were randomized between no further treatment and a boost of 16 Gy to the primary tumor bed. The cosmetic result at 3-year follow-up was assessed by a panel for 731 patients, and by digitizer measurements, measuring the displacement of the nipple, for 1141 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between various patient, tumor, and treatment factors and cosmesis. RESULTS: The factors associated with a worsened cosmesis according to the panel evaluation were: an inferior tumor location, a large excision volume, the presence of postoperative breast complications, and the radiotherapy boost. According to the digitizer measurements, a central/superior tumor location, a large excision volume, an increased pathological tumor size, an increased radiation dose inhomogeneity, and an increased bra cup size resulted in an increased asymmetry in nipple position. It appeared that the evaluation of the nipple position (whether by panel or by digitizer) is only moderately representative of the overall cosmetic outcome. CONCLUSION: To achieve a good cosmesis, it is necessary to excise the tumor with a limited margin, to avoid postoperative complications, to assess the need for a boost in the individual patient, and to give the radiation dose as homogeneously as possible. As far as the method of evaluation is concerned, the panel evaluation is the most appropriate method for giving an overall impression of the cosmetic result after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The use of the digitizer is recommended for comparing the cosmetic outcome of two different approaches to BCT or for analyzing cosmetic changes over time.

The influence of the boost in breast-conserving therapy on cosmetic outcome in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of a radiotherapy boost on the cosmetic outcome after 3 years of follow-up in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In EORTC trial 22881/10882, 5569 Stage I and II breast cancer patients were treated with tumorectomy and axillary dissection, followed by tangential irradiation of the breast to a dose of 50 Gy in 5 weeks, at 2 Gy per fraction. Patients having a microscopically complete tumor excision were randomized between no boost and a boost of 16 Gy. The cosmetic outcome was evaluated by a panel, scoring photographs of 731 patients taken soon after surgery and 3 years later, and by digitizer measurements, measuring the displacement of the nipple of 3000 patients postoperatively and of 1141 patients 3 years later. RESULTS: There was no difference in the cosmetic outcome between the two treatment arms after surgery, before the start of radiotherapy. At 3-year follow-up, both the panel evaluation and the digitizer measurements showed that the boost had a significant adverse effect on the cosmetic result. The panel evaluation at 3 years showed that 86% of patients in the no-boost group had an excellent or good global result, compared to 71% of patients in the boost group (p = 0.0001). The digitizer measurements at 3 years showed a relative breast retraction assessment (pBRA) of 7.6 pBRA in the no-boost group, compared to 8.3 pBRA in the boost group, indicating a worse cosmetic result in the boost group at follow-up (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that a boost dose of 16 Gy had a negative, but limited, impact on the cosmetic outcome after 3 years.

Results of a phase II trial of epirubicin and cisplatin (EP) before and after irradiation and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an EORTC GITCCG study.

The objective of the present study was to define the role of chemotherapy, in the form of the EP regimen, consisting of epirubicin (E) and cisplatin (P) in addition to irradiation in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for treatment of pancreatic cancer. 53 eligible patients with histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with three cycles of E 60 mg/m2 (if this dose was well tolerated then the dose of E was increased by 10 mg/m2 in the next cycle; 80 mg/m2 was the maximum dose for the following cycles) and P 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks, followed after 4 weeks by a split course of irradiation of 40 Gy with 5-FU 500 mg/m2 on each of the first 3 days of each 20 Gy treatment segment. This was followed by another three cycles of EP in patients who achieved stable disease (SD) or a better response after the first three cycles. The treatment given with standard anti-emetics was moderately tolerated. The chemotherapy related toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and the chemoradiotherapy related toxicity of gastrointestinal side-effects. However, due to the long duration of treatment which made the whole treatment difficult to endure, only 18/53 (34%) actually completed the full treatment regimen. Responses were evaluated after the first three cycles and 4 weeks after the completion of the treatment by serial CT-scans using standard criteria. The results in 53 evaluable patients after the first three cycles of EP were as follows: 1 patient achieved a clinical complete response (CR), 7 a partial response (PR) (CR + PR: 15%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 11-33%), 36 patients (68%) had stable disease (SD) and 6 patients progressive disease (PD). There was 1 early PD, 1 toxic death and 1 patient could not be evaluated. The response at the end of the treatment was 3 CR, 11 PR (CR + PR: 14/53 (26%); 95% CI: 15-40%), 30 SD and 6 PD. The median time to progression was 8.9 months and the median duration of response 13.1 months. The median survival of all treated patients was 10.8 months (range 7 days to 41.5 months), of responders 15.1 months and, of the patients with SD 10.3 months. These results are comparable to other combined modality regimens reported in the literature for locally advanced disease. The addition of the systemic treatment with E and P offers no additional advantage to combined modality treatment alone.

Results of treatment of the adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

The results of treatment in 74 patients treated in 1978-1990 for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were retrospectively analyzed. The overall five-year survival was 7.8%, the median survival 10.0 months. Eighteen patients underwent a resection, in 13 patients with curative and in 5 patients with palliative intent. The median survival for these groups was 13.5 and 5.8 months, respectively. Thirty-one patients were irradiated. The response rate according to the WHO passage score was 79%. The median duration of response and survival was 6.0 and 9.5 months, respectively. Twenty patients were given palliative treatment, in the form of an endoprosthesis (10 patients), an endoprosthesis with chemotherapy (4 patients) or only chemotherapy (6 patients). The median duration of survival of patients in the palliative group was 6.5 months. The data are discussed in relation to results of treatment described in the literature.

Accelerated fractionation radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer, acute, and late toxicity.

The acute toxicity of an accelerated radiotherapy scheme was compared with a conventional schedule. Eighteen patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx were treated with accelerated fractionation radiotherapy. An average reduction of overall treatment time of 11 days was accomplished by giving 2 fractions a day during the last part of the treatment. Total dose and fraction dose were left unchanged. Acute reactions of skin and mucosa in these patients were compared with those in 40 patients treated with a conventional fractionation scheme, that is, 2 Gy per fraction, 5 fractions per week, to a total dose of 64-70 Gy. Acute reactions were maximal between 5 and 7 weeks after the start of treatment. Complete healing occurred within 3 months in all patients. Mucosal reactions and, as a consequence, dysphagia were clearly increased in those patients treated with accelerated fractionation. For confluent mucositis an ED50 of 66 Gy was calculated compared to 69 Gy for conventional fractionation. To a lesser degree, skin toxicity was also enhanced in the patients treated with the accelerated schedule. Severe edema of the laryngeal mucosa occurred only in patients treated to a total dose of 68 or 70 Gy and was somewhat more frequent with accelerated fractionation (4/10) than with conventional fractionation (4/24). One patient in the accelerated fractionation group underwent laryngectomy for persistent edema and laryngeal necrosis. No severe late skin reactions were observed. It can be concluded that the fractionation schedule tested in this study is feasible. Further shortening of overall treatment time without reduction of total dose will likely lead to unacceptable acute and, possibly, also late toxicity.

Local control in T3 laryngeal cancer treated with radical radiotherapy, time dose relationship: the concept of nominal standard dose and linear quadratic model.

In a retrospective study of the Dutch cooperative head and neck group 104 evaluable patients with T3NxMO squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx were treated primarily with a full course of radiotherapy. The results of treatment are presented in terms of locoregional control. The actuarial 3-year local control rate was 53%. Regional control was 77% for node positive patients and 96% for N0 patients (p = 0.01). Surgical salvage was successful in 53% of cases with a local recurrence and in 3/8 regional recurrences, resulting in an ultimate locoregional control rate of 83% for N0 patients and 68% for N+ patients. A uni- and multivariate analysis of local control rate versus total dose, nominal standard dose, and extrapolated response dose has been done. To calculate extrapolated response dose the linear quadratic equation was used, assuming an a/b of 10 and a potential doubling time of clonogenic cells of 3, 5, and 7 days. In multivariate analysis the extrapolated response dose with a potential doubling time of 5 days was the only independent prognostic factor for local control (p = 0.069) and ultimate locoregional control (p = 0.0015). Nominal standard dose showed no dose-response relationship. Based on the S-shaped dose response curve, using the LQ model, several therapeutical options are discussed.

Postoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer. An interim analysis of a prospective, randomized multicenter trial in The Netherlands.

The authors assessed the potential benefit of postoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer in a two-arm, prospective multicenter trial. One hundred seventy-two patients who had undergone surgical resection for rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to either treatment consisting of external irradiation to a dose of 5000 cGy in 5 weeks or a control group (no adjuvant therapy). It was assumed that the number of cells remaining after radical surgery would be low and that the dose of 5000 cGy would be adequate in eradicating the majority of those cells. The number of local recurrences was lower in the treated group of patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. It was assumed that if a significant reduction in the number of local recurrences could be obtained, improved (disease-free) survival would result. No influence on disease-free or overall survival could be detected. These results were in agreement with those reported in Europe and the US, and it was concluded that postoperative radiation therapy alone cannot be justified as a routine procedure in the primary management of resectable rectal cancer.

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cisplatin (FAP) followed by radiation and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

A total of 19 patients (7 men, 12 women) with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with six cycles of FAP (5-fluorouracil, 300 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-5; Adriamycin, 50 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; cisplatin, 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-5). Each course was repeated every 28 days. After six cycles, the treatment was followed by irradiation amounting to 4,000 cGy (split course) in combination with 5-FU (500 mg/m2) on days 1-3 of the two irradiation periods. The median age of our patients was 55 years (range, 40-64 years). The median WHO performance status was 1, with a range of 0-2. Three (16%) complete (CR) and six (31%) partial responses (PR) were observed, as were six cases of stable disease (SD) and four of progressive disease (PD). The median duration of response was 11 months, with a range of 4-24 months, and the median survival was 14 months (range, 5-27 + months). FAP toxicity was tolerated fairly poorly. The dose-limiting toxic effect was myelosuppression, with a mean WBC nadir of WHO grade 1.6 (range, 0-3) and a mean platelet count of WHO grade 1.1 (range, 0-4). Nausea and vomiting were not dose-limiting. Complete alopecia was seen in 14/19 patients. Neuropathy was mild (WHO grade 1) in seven and moderate (grade 2) in four. Irradiation in combination with 5-FU was generally well tolerated. Due to several reasons, only ten patients could be treated with all six cycles of FAP. We conclude that in future combined modality studies, irradiation should be given after three cycles of chemotherapy, and that combined modality treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is feasible and warrants further testing.